Welcome

edit

Hello, Rigleybr, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Thanks, ZI Jony (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

February 2018

edit

Please avoid synthesis of content and adding content to BLP not supported by source directly like you did here. See WP:INTEGRITY also. This is not minor changes like you claimed in edit summary. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thabang Makwetla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your page creations

edit

I see you've created a significant number of articles in the past few days. That's great, but ideally the referencing on those articles would be better. Having Google Maps as the only reference for an article on a town like Springbokpan is less than ideal. And for biographies such as Sindisiwe Chikunga, while I have no doubt the person is notable, there's almost no information in the article as is. Including information such as when they were elected as an MP would be ideal. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hallo, When you create an article like John Jeffery (politician), please remember to provide navigation from the basic name John Jeffery. In this case a WP:hatnote needed expanding - I've done so. Sometimes it's a case of adding to a disambiguation page. Either way, you ought to help readers to find the article you've just created. There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it's an interesting journey! Happy Editing. PamD 08:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Categories and stub tags

edit

I do hate to pile on, but I wanted to ask you also to consider adding a few categories to new articles as you create them. They'll help organize the articles as they're written, and group them with other similar ones. Adding a stub tag will also help to notify other people that the article can be expanded.

Have a look at what I've added to Constance Bapela, for starters. I see you've also edited Thabang Makwetla - that's a great example of an article with categories you can consider.

Sorry to be a bother - you really are doing great work. Just wanted to offer a couple of tips on how to make it even better. :-)

Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions. I won't be available tonight, but I'll try to get back to you as soon as I can.

Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

African towns - need inline citations

edit

Hi Rigleybr, Greetings. You have created a batch of pages of South Africa towns with only of Google map reference doesnt not reflect a proper reliable and independent citation. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information to avoid the deletion of the pages. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

  1. reliable source - see WP:RS
  2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
  3. verification - see WP:V
  4. notability - see WP:N
  5. webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations as you have done with the South Africa's politicians, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

From Rigleybr

edit

Thank you all for the help. I'm new to editing Wikipedia (obviously), and this is definitely good advice. I love broadening the "information catalogue" of the world, so doing it right makes me very happy.

Ways to improve Kleinpoort

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Rigleybr, thanks for creating Kleinpoort!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Bokwidi

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Rigleybr, thanks for creating Bokwidi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thomas Walls

edit

Hello, Rigleybr. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Thomas Walls, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Jbh Talk 20:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Thomas Walls

edit

Hello, Rigleybr,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Thomas Walls should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Walls .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Jbh Talk 21:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Boguslaw Wozniak

edit

Hello, Rigleybr,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Boguslaw Wozniak should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boguslaw Wozniak .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Jbh Talk 21:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Pierre-Louis Boitel

edit

Hello, Rigleybr,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pierre-Louis Boitel should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Louis Boitel .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Jbh Talk 21:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Editing talk pages

edit

Hi. I noticed from your edit at AfD that you appear to be unfamiliar with editing talk pages. You may want to take a look at \this brief tutorial on editing talk pages. Also Please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~. This will insert your user name and a time stamp when you save the page. Thank you. Jbh Talk 21:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Makhubung

edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Rigleybr, thanks for creating Makhubung!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Africa

edit

Hi Rigleybr,

I saw your work on articles related to Africa and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch the WikiProject Africa talk page, which is a noticeboard for Wikipedia's Africa coverage. It's a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about Africa-related content. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider adopting a cleanup category or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thabang Makwetla

edit

Hello, I can understand your point, however, we use phonemic transcriptions / /, and allophonics should only be used for phonetic transcriptions (i.e. [ ]). Like I said in my edits, check Help:IPA/English as the glottal stop should only be used for words like uh-oh. — they call me AWESOMEmeeos ... [ˈɔɪ̯]! 04:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ban Long Mao (March 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 08:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Rigleybr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 08:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: B. Home Phanh has been accepted

edit
 
B. Home Phanh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join Women in Red

edit
 
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.55% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for April:

April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 08:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rigleybr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gratitude Magwanishe

edit
 

The article Gratitude Magwanishe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ntime Skhosana

edit
 

The article Ntime Skhosana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet the GNG. Skhosana is occasionally quoted in the press, but my search found none of the in-depth coverage of him needed to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply