Rob ten Berge
|
License tagging for Image:Rob ten Berge.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Rob ten Berge.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:ROB TEN BERGE copy.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:ROB TEN BERGE copy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of [[:{{{1}}}]]
editHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on [[:{{{1}}}]], by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:{{{1}}}]] is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate [[:{{{1}}}]] itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
20:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
editPlease do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Pjacobi 20:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for {{{1}}}
editThanks for uploading [[:{{{1}}}]]. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Second vandalism warning
editPlease stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vitruvian man, you will be blocked from editing. 128.62.94.105 03:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:VITRUVIAN_MAN_=Rob_ten_Berge.jpg listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:VITRUVIAN_MAN_=Rob_ten_Berge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- = Vitruvian man (2) by Rob ten Berge 1984 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.72.150.84 (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
--82.72.150.84 (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Best regards, Rob ten Berge --82.72.150.84 (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Your edits
editIf you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia.
Please stop with your self promotional and disruptive edits. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- I have also deleted your userpage for the same reasons. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image talk:Vitruvian Man (2) Rob ten Berge.jpg
editThank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image talk:Vitruvian Man (2) Rob ten Berge.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 18:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
The image "Vitruvian Man 2", I made as a contribution to the article about Leonardo da Vinci's version is accepted by Wikemedia Commons. It took a long time to learn a lot of copyright-rules. Rob ten Berge (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vitruvian_Man Rob ten Berge (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)