October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Avanti West Coast, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Monarch Airlines. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Monarch Airlines) for a period of 1 week for repeatedly adding a website for a defunct company without engaging in discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at South Western Railway (train operating company), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, stop edit warring! And hoaxing! Jalen Folf (talk) 19:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

BUT IT NEEDS TO BE UPDATED! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
No, it doesn't. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and does not need to be accurate up to the minute. We only publish information that has been published somewhere else first, so we wait for sources. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at South Western Railway (train operating company), you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

THE PAGE SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY (TRAIN OPERATING COMPANY) HAS TO BE UPDATED! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
See @HJ Mitchell‘s reply above. Danners430 (talk) 15:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Danners430. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Danners430 (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

STOP THAT IT IS SO IMPORTANT TO FIX IT! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please stop shouting, it's not making anyone take you more seriously. If you have genuine reasons why you believe this should be changed, suggest them - but edit warring will not help your cause. Danners430 (talk) 16:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because i need to fix the redirects that are something wrong! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
And also do not block me for doing disruptive edits! i was just fixing the edits! now you are going to be blocked for 8 months for blocking me! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Let's get one thing clear: you are not an administrator, and do not have the ability to impose blocks upon anybody. I, however, am an administrator, and if Drmies (also an admin) had not already blocked you, I would have done so for your behaviour at Tehran Imam Khomeini International Airport (see page history). You have given no good reason for the removal of either {{Redirect category shell}} or {{R from move}}, both of which are supposed to be there. Nor have you given any adequate explanation for dozens of similar removals on other redirect pages. Is it because you don't understand what they are for? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, it needs to be replaced with {{Template:R from long name}} instead! Robbie Kirillov (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
One, simple question - why. Danners430 (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because I need it to fix some redirects Robbie Kirillov (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
What exactly do you mean by "fix some redirects"? The redirects that you have been editing were working perfectly well before you touched them. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wait. You're going to edit war and yell at people in edit summaries, and tell everyone that this or that technical thing is incorrect (without explaining why), but you can't properly place an unblock request or use a template to call an admin in for help? Read the instructions. Drmies (talk) 16:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

nope. Robbie Kirillov (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 22:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
can you please unblock me? Robbie Kirillov (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No. And if you start with the demands and abuse like you did after your previous block, I will remove talkpage access entirely. Acroterion (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply