Rogcraigvogel

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Rogcraigvogel/sandbox (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rogcraigvogel/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Rogcraigvogel/sandbox (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rogcraigvogel/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 02:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Domingo Marcos Durán

Hello, there. I've accepted your draft and moved to article space at Domingo Marcos Durán where you can continue to work on it if you wish. Frankly, I can't understand why this was rejected. This was a very needed article and very well-referenced. The reviewers at Articles for Creation work very hard, but often lack the expertise to review subjects like this. I've fixed the Wiki-markup and formatting for you. Wikipedia's "little ways" are often baffling to beginners. I know they were to me when I started here back in 2006. If you ever need any help with future articles or anything else on Wikipedia, just post a message on my talk page. You can also drop by WikiProject Classical Music. On the project's talk page editors working in the area can exchange ideas and ask questions. Visitors and new members are always welcome! Thank you once again for your article. Your expertise and effort are very much appreciated. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 07:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Roger C. Vogel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roger C. Vogel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Roger Vogel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roger Vogel.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

I have replaced the photo with one that I took myself.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogercraigvogel (talk • contribs) 20:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

However, the new photo still has the "This file has an invalid fair use claim and may be deleted after Sunday, 25 June 2017." statement. Rogercraigvogel (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2017

Hi Rogercraigvogel. The {{deletable image-caption}} I added was hidden when the file it applied to was deleted. This template would have been eventually removed by a WP:BOT or another editor doing clean up. However, you re-added the new image before that either of those things happened so the template was re-activated so to speak. I have gone in and removed it so it should no longer be an issue. In addition, the Template:Talkback you tried to add is typically added to the talk page of the editor you are trying to reach, so in this case you should've added that to my user talk page instead. You also need to make sure that the double curly brackets are at the beginning and the end of the template for it to work properly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)