Welcome!
Hello, Roidroid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! — Omegatron 05:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Table of biofuel crop yields
editI'm sorry but I still am not sure about the source/s of all this info: which published source has it come from? More specifically, consider the line of Soybean data (as an example): "soybean 375 446 335 48". Exactly where do I go to verify this data? Johnfos (talk) 03:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- this info is in the referenced page [1]
Soybean Glycine max 46
- the other figures you quoted were simple unit conversions from that. I see what you mean now though - the figures all seem to be inflated by 2 gallons per acre. It seems it was like this when Ddelpercio first added the info, so she either inflated the figures herself or they were like that when she sourced them from the Petroleum club. Either way - while that Petroleum club source remains unverifiable, the data should probably be manually updated to the ACTUAL verifiable data in the references that we DID find. (ie: all should be reduced 2 gallons per acre). I'd still like to know why the Petroleum Club's data is inflated by 2 gallons per acre though, assuming goodwill. Roidroid (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
"Kill A Watt" AfD
editThe article Kill A Watt to which you have contributed in the past has recently been nominated for deletion by someone. You may wish to provide your valuable comments. --AB (talk) 04:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Gay for Bridget
edit- If you have a reliable source (ie. not Urbandictionary or other user-contributed content) I have no issues. JuJube (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- It is difficult to find such sources for Internet Memes so it may take some time. How are other Internet Meme articles sourced? ps: are you getting this message if i post it on my own talkpage? (and likewise, will i get notified if you reply to something i type on your talkpage?) i do not understand the wikipedia notification system for such things Roidroid (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
See also
editI've just changed See Also to See also in a couple of places where you added that as a section heading. Under WP:MOS, it is incorrect to capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
suggestion for deleted section
editYour section "Linguistic relativity and bilingualism" was deleted without much discussion, but I still feel that it had sufficient substance to go somewhere. Hpvpp (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have much invested in the section, i was merely concerned about an in-line link to a commercial website. Roidroid (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Nell's Eugenic Wedding
editHi Roidroid: Im glad you liked it. too bad the film isn't in existence. Cheers!Koplimek (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Roidroid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
editAs an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Roidroid. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Roidroid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editTyffs
editKhhejdhd 83.191.127.103 (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- 🇸🇪🤷🏼♂️ Roidroid (talk) 02:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)