Rovers Forever
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trevor Croly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovan Bratislava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Will update this. Thanks
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rovers Forever. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter (talk) 03:15, 11 November 2012 (UTC) |
Rovers Forever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Guilty until proven innocent here??
Decline reason:
Well, actually you're proven to have used a drawer full of socks. Max Semenik (talk) 21:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proven? That does say suspected. If it helps I live in an apartment complex where presumably there are other IPs. Also look at my contributions in creating pages.
- Regardless of the semantics of the tag, Checkuser has confirmed that you have used multiple accounts to disrupt the project. Any unblock requests will need to address your use of multiple accounts to be considered. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Why would I have multiple accounts when I am registered?
Any of you Lords of the Universe care to answer the question above? And again I point to the contributions I have made some of whom shamefully have been deleted.
- Your question has gone unanswered because only you can tell us why you would use multiple accounts when you are registered. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
You have answered. And I have told you I only use this account. The "evidence" is dubious at best. What about the pages I have created?
Well? Grateful if this ban could be lifted as I have more pages to add. Which is the only reason I am here.
- A block for sockpuppetry with Checkuser confirmation of same is generally not undone, and certainly not with the behaviour you're displaying. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
The article John Cervi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Alan Dodd (Irish footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, has not played for a club in a fully professional league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Alan Dodd (Irish footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Dodd (Irish footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Dodd (Irish footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Matt Britton
The article Matt Britton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article has no references
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Matt Britton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Britton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Britton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Graham O'Keeffe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham O'Keeffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham O'Keeffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article David Tyrrell (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The latter as per this and the former because the coverage of him is entirely routine; mentions in match reports but nothing to show that he meets notability criteria for biographies.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 16:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Paul Stokes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as per GSA and World Football. In terms of WP:GNG, if we exclude match reports and transfer announcements, we have this and this, which is not enough.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 19:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gerry Clarke for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.