The Signpost: 4 September 2024

edit

You've got e-mail!

edit
 
Hello, TarnishedPath. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Headline correction

edit

Hi there. Just FYI that I've checked the headline on Newspapers.com and ProQuest, and it appears to have been correct before you changed it here. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK I'll revert that one. It looked like two different headlines in the newspaper archive TarnishedPathtalk 11:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see - where it continues on p. 4, it has a slightly different headline to what's on the front page, where the article starts. But I think it's best to use the first headline. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

edit
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Basem Al-Shayeb on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Teamwork Barnstar
I appreciated your comment about how to organize the sections in an RFC to promote discussion. I thought your approach is both realistic and helpful, and your explanation might encourage others to do the same. Thanks! WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of SDSS J0849+1114

edit

  Hello! Your submission of SDSS J0849+1114 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chaiten1 (talk) 08:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

edit
 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for SDSS J0849+1114

edit

On 25 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SDSS J0849+1114, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that light travelled 1.06 billion light-years from a trio of galaxies in the constellation of Cancer, where three supermassive black holes were colliding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SDSS J0849+1114. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SDSS J0849+1114), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

edit

Re: Fifth five-year plan (China) moved to draftspace

edit

Thank you for your comments. I have now added a few books as references, please review them again. HelenAtkinson2002 (talk) 03:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @HelenAtkinson2002, I see that @SafariScribe has reviewed the article when you submitted it through WP:AFC. I suggest that you take onboard any feedback that they've provided and further improve the article. TarnishedPathtalk 04:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI archiving

edit

On 26 September you used Archiver to archive some threads from ANI. It looks like Archiver may not understand ANI archive names. The threads should have gone into the current archive Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1167 but instead Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Archive 1 was created and they were put there. I'll try to fix it. NebY (talk) 10:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@NebY, thanks for the advice. I didn't realise that the archiver wouldn't work there and won't use it on that page again. TarnishedPathtalk 11:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@NebY thanks for cleaning up after me. I think the error might have been mine for not specifying a non-standard archiving name and presuming the script would automatically know. I will use more care in the future. TarnishedPathtalk 11:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Aha; Archiver might be great in other ways (I've not used it) but it does seem a curious design choice not to look at the page's |archive= and |counter=. I've seen OneClickArchiver used on ANI without apparent problems, and of course Lowercase sigmabot III just keeps going. NebY (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was just reading the documentation for both Archiver and OneClickArchiver. It seems that OneClickArchiver does look at the archiving templates on a page to determine the archiving location. Archiver automatically looks for the highest number to archive to, e.g. Foo/Archive x or Foo/Month Year. Anything else outside of that isn't suported for Archiver. I just asked the maintainer and they advised that they have no intention to add the functionality. TarnishedPathtalk 11:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply