Rtyjhnghfn

April 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

How did I engage in disruptive editing? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bibites (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bibites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

What did I do wrong? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Rtyjhnghfn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bibites (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bibites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bibites (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bibites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Why was my submission declined? Plus,how can I make it so that my submission can be accepted? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

It says in the grey box above, it lacks reliable, independent sourcing. Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

How can I add reliable,independent sourcing to my WIkipedia page? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bibites (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bibites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

How can I add reliable, independent sourcing to my Wikipedia page? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Bibites

Hello, Rtyjhnghfn

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nagol0929, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, The Bibites, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nagol0929}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nagol0929 (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

{{Re|Nagol0929}} How did my Wikipedia page meet one or more of Wikipedia's deletion criteria?Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 18:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to The Bibites. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - 11:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Bibites for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bibites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bibites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bibites (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Bibites and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

The reason that both the draft and the article do not have independent secondary sources is because I cannot find any. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

If there are no reliable secondary sources, the topic does not qualify for an article. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Well, there are no reliable,secondary sources for my article, how can I make my article suitable for Wikipedia? Also,I made the The Bibites Wikipedia article because before my article was made,there were no mentions of the Bibites around, and I was just trying to create a Wikipedia page about a artificial life simulation that before, Wikipedia just did not mention. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 04:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't just mean the page is unsuitable for an article. I mean the game itself does not qualify to have an article about it. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

I wrote this page because Wikipedia did not mention The Bibites before my page was written. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 04:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Bibites and Talk:The Bibites. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dawnbails (talk) 18:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

The reason that I oppose the deletion of the "The Bibites" Wikipedia article is because if deleted, Wikipedia will have no mentions of The Bibites. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 23:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your opposition to the page being deleted does not allow you to remove deletion templates. You may participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bibites. If the consensus is to delete the article (which seems to be the way it's leaning), it will be deleted. This process will not be stopped just because the article's author wants to keep it. Wikipedia policy is to only have articles on notable subjects. The Bibites is, by all appearances, not notable. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:The Bibites, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your AfD hasn't been closed, nor has consensus on it been reached. Don't remove the AfD template and then add one on the talk page describing consensus to keep the article. Dawnbails (talk) 18:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. ^Tools: (talk, contribs) 19:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Well,this article is about Bright Eyes,Ceasars mother.That is why this page is important.You cant have a page about a fictional character unless you also have a page about that fictional characters mother. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

A wikipedia page does not need sources. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 00:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello, I'm Mellk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Untermensch without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes)

The article Bright Eyes (Planet of The Apes) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello, Rtyjhnghfn,

Do not do random article page moves that are not explained. If you believe an article should be at a different title, please start a discussion on the article talk page.

If you have questions about moving pages, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Neurax Worm shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Then,how can I have my Neurax WOrm page a full article page and not just a redirect? Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Moriori genocide

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Moriori genocide, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.-gadfium 18:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Edward the Black Prince, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gulf War, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 22:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, the Soviet Union did side with the coalition during the Gulf War. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gulf War. Additionally, reverting again on this page will put you in violation of 3RR. Loafiewa (talk) 22:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gulf War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 08:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Discussing changes

Hi Rtyjhnghfn, I noticed your edits to the article on the Middle Ages. There is a general consensus to have generalised start and end points for the period. In short the medieval period in one place may start and end at different points compared to another location, not to mention that picking a single start or end point isn't straightforward when there are debates about transition and continuity with certain points. You are welcome to raise the issue on the article's talk page. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Then, why are people picking the single end point of 500-1500 for the Middle Ages? The dates 500-1500 are so arbitrary, and it does not reflect people's lives at that time. Meanwhile, something special did happen in 476, and something special did happen in 1517. You say that the start and end dates of the Middle Ages are blurry and therefore, my dates are wrong, but, are you and people doing the same thing by saying that the Middle Ages lasted from 500 to 1500? You are just doing double standards. Meanwhile, I am reverting your edits, because the dates 500-1500 are so arbitrary. People were just living normal lives at that time. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Plus, the dates of the source of that said that the Middle Ages lasted from 500 to 150 are arbitrary. Rtyjhnghfn (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOR and WP:NPOV: we are not here to share our thoughts with our readers, but to present all significant scholarly views in a neutral way based on reliable sources. Borsoka (talk) 05:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Middle Ages

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Borsoka (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)