Rua2006
Speedy deletion of "Dante and Galante"
edit
A page you created, Dante and Galante, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thanks. SoWhy Talk 20:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
edit
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Omega World Travel, Inc. v. Mummagraphics, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Omega World Travel, Inc. v. Mummagraphics, Inc.
edit Hello! Your submission of Omega World Travel, Inc. v. Mummagraphics, Inc. at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Martin v Hearst Corporation
edit Hello! Your submission of Martin v Hearst Corporation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Martin v. Hearst Corporation
edit | On 16 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martin v. Hearst Corporation, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to Martin v. Hearst Corp., expungement of your criminal record does not entitle you to make old news disappear? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |