Your submission at Articles for creation: Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology (May 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. joe deckertalk 15:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rubyhuynh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 15:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://cala.asia/introduction/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The CALA - The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology

edit

  Hello, Rubyhuynh. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The CALA - The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The CALA - The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology

edit
 

Hello, Rubyhuynh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The CALA - The Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June/July 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubyhuynh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I myself have not spammed, not acted to advertise anything, and certainly no more than any other entity contributing to academia on wiki. I am simply posting information that expands awareness of the field, and the great academics within the field, both alive and dead. I am an academic, who is not employed at all, and I simply contribute to global societies in Linguistics and Anthropology.

Decline reason:

It's very clear you have been trying to promote CALA. Please see what 331dot has already said below.   Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 16:00, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubyhuynh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Should you deny my entry, then that is your prerogative. But the truth is that I have not acted against Wiki policy, have no monetary intention, have not acted unlike thousands of other associations on wiki, and have only attempted to expand the field, and its very relevant nature. There is no autobiographical content here. The CALA stretches across networks with major universities globally, and hence is not a small independent cause. These organizations are SOAS, Temple university, University of Hawaii, University of Illinois, and over 150 others.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry but this request really adds nothing to the previous one which was declined. We want to hear that you are here to edit the encyclopedia at large and not a page on which you have a potential conflict of interest, and that you understand and agree to abide by our policies and guidelines. I am hearing none of this. kingboyk (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rubyhuynh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry but you have blocked me from editing the article for weeks. Therefore, until now, I cannot make any changes to the draft I made.

Decline reason:

Your request clearly states that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. Consequently, I have withdrawn your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 12:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Note for next to admin to review: My feeling is that the new unblock request offers nothing new, and that it should be declined and the user reblocked without talk page access. If you feel differently please go ahead as you see fit. --kingboyk (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

protracted discussion before I declined

edit

What is your association with the conference you have tried three times to write about, without independent reliable sources? 331dot (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have attempted to write three times on this, as each time, my efforts have been thwarted. The second upload was submitted as a draft, and was to be revised. By independent reliable sources, if you mean references, and people who are not involved in Asian Linguistic Anthropology, then there is an immeasurable number of these sources, but I am not given an opportunity to revise this, and to more importantly show this to these independent sources to offer their endorsement and input. We should be given a several day opportunity to do this, but we have not been given this. Also, pages such as JSEALS have very similar intentions and frameworks, and they are now up. The CALA network and its scholarly intentions covers a network of hundreds of universities globally, and has a journal publication, as does JSEALS. There is no difference in intention, but the two differ in field. However, there are countless other examples, and we do question why a page on the field of Asian Linguistic Anthropology has been brought down, very unfairly, despite the benevolent and very non-profit aims, of a global network of people. This page differs in no way to the multitude of other pages on Language and Social Science. The page addresses the very significant issue of localization of Linguistic Anthropology, and its relevance to Asia. Much significant work has been conducted on Asian language and society, and this page opens doors for this. The page addresses a broader framework of Linguistic Anthropology that includes relevant people, and disenfranchised communities throughout Asia, who all need this page and its information to receive Social, Linguistic, and Anthropological, as well as educative opportunities, to alleviate their difficult circumstances. This information does absolutely not serve any monetary purpose at all. The Global network on Asian Linguistic Anthropology is supported by hundreds of scholars, who publish on and contribute to work in the field, work which has a history of over a century in its scholarship.

You have not answered my question. In addition, who is "we"? Any article about this conference would need to only consist of what independent sources state, not what the conference or its representatives want to say about it. Please read WP:OSE on why other similar articles existing does not automatically mean yours can too. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


My association with the conference is that I am an academic who is contributing to the field, and as an academic, I have dedicated much of my life to the field, over the past ten years, as I have with thousands of others who contribute to the conference and the related associations. I am one of a large group of people who tirelessly work to expand the field to assist Asian academics and societies who are oppressed to receive voice. I do this by giving to the society and assisting the society to expand its visibility. I am absolutely not employed by the CALA, and all contributions are voluntary and academic. I am an Asian Linguistic Anthropologist who works toward awareness of the field, and this is central to the Conference. Incidentally, despite that the name is Conference, it spans and covers much more than a conference. There are two 'we's. The first is generic, for all wiki contributors, and the second symbolizes the collective mindset of Asian Linguistic Anthropology, all of whom have desperately wanted to have representation on wiki, and to funnel the information on Asian Language and Society through Wikipedia. There is no money in this, and we (linguistics, Anthropologists, and any associated society or journal) certainly do not benefit monetarily. Yes, correct, the fact that other organizations or the like have wiki pages does not warrant our inclusion, but, these can be used as benchmarks, which I am certain a great number of contributors do. However, other people and groups not abiding by wiki rules should warrant their exclusion, which was my point. Many bodies enter their own pages, on wiki, yet they are published.

I am prepared to immediately revise the content, given the opportunity.

We can only address inappropriate pages if and when they are detected by volunteer editors. It is possible for articles that are inappropriate to exist for years. If unblocked, you are welcome to point out any inappropriate pages you are aware of. 331dot (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is your prerogative, as to whether this page is allowed to be edited. But, no one involved has attempted anything but to help Asian Language and Society, and with no reward to themselves.
I fixed the formatting of your request. You don't have to get a reward from it to be promoting it. 331dot (talk) 16:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi. According to the definition of 'promote', every single Wikipedia page promotes its theme. Every single page raises its status through visibility. That is the central notion of 'promote'. I have acted very justly at every stage, and have needed time to revise the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubyhuynh (talkcontribs) 16:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply