Welcome!

Hello, Ruchidamania! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Stikkyy (talk) (contributions) 05:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marina Kuwar (March 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TimothyJosephWood 13:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Ruchidamania, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 13:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marina Kuwar (March 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 13:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:DJ Rink, from its old location at User:Ruchidamania/Dj Rink. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Marina Kuwar, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Rink (January 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry and undisclosed paid editing..
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GABgab 21:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruchidamania (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here I have been blocked unnecessaryly, as the edits which I had made were right and gad requested to a article from non deletion because it is agenuice bollywood actress, model. Her facebook is also verified and she is to been to seen on google as well.

Decline reason:

Yeah, your edits may be "right", but it doesn't address the reason as to why your account is blocked. Please review the instructions if you need help. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruchidamania (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The edits are non paid had edited because she is a very good friend plus I was her social media manager on a prject based.

Decline reason:

Whether you were paid actual money or not, that very firmly places you in violation of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Please reread those policies. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

edit

This user has engaged in block evasion and vote stacking, as 86.20.193.222 (talk · contribs), in violation of WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

{unblock|reason=Please help me unblock my account I will follow all the rules and I assure you I do not have multiple accounts, please guide me through this process. ruchidamania 16:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)}}