User talk:Rugbyfan22/Archive 4
Nomination of Harry Lewis (footballer, born 1997) for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Lewis (footballer, born 1997) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Lewis (footballer, born 1997) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kő Cloch (talk) 22:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Lewis (footballer, born 1997)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Harry Lewis (footballer, born 1997), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kő Cloch (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 15 January
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Durham County Cricket Club page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Sterling work
editOn the county championship page. I know that kinda thing is a pain in the arse to do, so hats off! LeverageSerious (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
editPlease do not add or change content, as you did at Southampton F.C., without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It is discouraging that you're continuing to ignore the messages on this issue. If you don't WP:INLINECITE Semisi Tupou, it risks being nominated for deletion. It can also never become a Good Article or Featured Article, and people can't use it easily for research, because it's unclear where each piece of info comes from, becoming more tangled as the article (hopefully) grows - although because of this, editors are put off editing it at all. Please rectify this. Boleyn (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Southampton Academy / Reserves / U23
editDue to recent updates you have have made, please see the discussion hatnote regarding these articles. There should be really only be one article for all sub-departments of each club. This has been agreed to in principle at WP:FOOTY. In the spirit of fairness, ideally the existing Academy article should be the one to stay as it is older, although the U23 article follows the display format better. Hopefully you can see the logic of this and can assist to move all relevant info onto one article and have the other downgraded to a redirect. Please leave any comments etc on the discussion which can be accessed via either article. Thanks.Crowsus (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Ospreys
editHi @Harriesss:, I've reverted your edits on Ospreys (rugby union) because you added unverified information, introducing a section called "Development Squad", but no citation stating a reliable source that that information comes from. I had a look at the official website, and they don't have such a section. I think that having a Development Squad section is a good thing, but it definitely needs to be verifiable. If you can find a reliable source listing the members of the Ospreys' development squad, feel free to revert my reversion and adding in a reference to the reliable source. Thanks, TheMightyPeanut (talk) 00:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Harri Millard
editHi, I'm Lineslarge. Harriesss, thanks for creating Harri Millard!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. More sources are needed for this article. Also, the link to the one cited appears broken.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Sexton (rugby player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randwick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of Hampshire County Cricket Club first-class players (2018–present)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of Hampshire County Cricket Club first-class players (2018–present) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jack | talk page 18:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
editHello, I'm Ansh666. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. To nominate articles for deletion, please follow WP:AFDHOWTO. ansh666 18:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
You blanked four articles that were merged into this article without actually nominating them for deletion. Since they have already been merged to the main article, I went ahead and redirected them there. A bot will come around and fix any double redirects that result. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melbourne Rebels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Australia national rugby team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Bare URLs
editHi there, Harriesss. You are continuously adding Bare URLs (i.e. references in the format <ref>url</ref>) to articles. Links like those are very susceptible to link rot; basically, if a website undergoes a redesign which results in article URL changes, the links you're adding will be broken therefore worthless. Can you please have a look at this section for information usually required for web page sources. Also, in this update, you added in the same reference multiple times, meaning it is listed several times in the References / Footnotes section. If you want to use the same source more than once, you should use reference names. Please have a look at this article for more information. Thanks, TheMightyPeanut (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Sources
editHi there Harriesss, when adding additional information that are not verifiable by existing sources, please ensure you add additional sources so that everything is verifiable. For example, in this edit and this edit, you added additional info not supported by existing references. I've fixed that up now, but please ensure you add additional sources in future. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 06:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Date range format
editHi Harriess, thanks for your good work on sports biography pages. I reverted one of your good faith edits here. Even though "2017–pres." only encompasses 2017 currently, the format is preferable to an open-ended date range as per MOS:DATERANGE. -- Ham105 (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Harriesss. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Rowan Jenkins
editHi, I'm Abishe. Harriesss, thanks for creating Rowan Jenkins!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.