Welcome!

edit

Hello Rund717, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SatuSuro 12:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your great edits so far! I copied your new article on Keralup over to article space. Feel welcome to join us over at WikiProject Western Australia - we're a pretty friendly bunch. I'm an admin as well, so if you run into grief with bots or whatever, let me know at my talk page. Orderinchaos 16:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back!

edit
 
We've kept the cookies warm!  

Welcome back to Wikipedia, Rund717. I see that you've returned after a period away and wanted to thank you for your contributions. If you haven't seen them before, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here again and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, ask it at the help desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome back! Evad37 [talk] 14:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belmont Spur Railway has been accepted

edit
 
Belmont Spur Railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

g'day

edit

Major edit to improve the structure and overall readability, add much more historucal and contextual background to timber railways in WA, and to delete the list of timber companies which is not relevant to the article topic

substantial changes to articles like this require some discussion, your opinion might not be shared by others editors as to what fits what, and it would help to understand how changes can occur - so as to ascertain what other editors might think. you have either the article talk page or that wa talk page as good starting points. I would strongly suggest that a WP:AGF understanding of how others might think as a way of negotiating changes really helps over time. JarrahTree 13:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kwinana freight railway has been accepted

edit
 
Kwinana freight railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 17:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Perth
added a link pointing to Garden Island
Perth Metropolitan Region
added a link pointing to Garden Island

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greater Bunbury has been accepted

edit
 
Greater Bunbury, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Greater Bunbury a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

City of Perth

edit

You are quite correct that the population figures for the City of Perth are clearly incorrect. They are also uncited, and seem to be the result of an assumption that the original figures in the article were an error, the person amending them not realising that the city was substantially reduced in size (and population) in the 1990s. I have reverted that change, which was made in June 2014, though we still need a citation to back up the original figures. Skinsmoke (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have also changed the tag you added to an unreferenced section tag, which seems to fit more appropriately now. Skinsmoke (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bunbury, Western Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No religion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Division of Curtin
added a link pointing to Swan River
Division of Swan
added a link pointing to Swan River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Burt

edit

Hi. Although Burt has been gazetted it cannot formally exist until the election is called (it has no representative while the seat it will replace, Charlton, still does). It could possibly go in the navbox as some sort of addendum or extra piece of information, in a lower list like "forthcoming" or some better name than that! :) Frickeg (talk) 20:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Rund717. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rund717. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rund717. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply