This is an archive of past discussions with User:Saber girl08. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

dont

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, just because an article is short doesnt mean its stands in criteria for speedy deletion. Miss Universe i an ongoing event and more information about the contestants will be produced during the time to the pageant.And a contestant in Miss Universe is notable. --Matrix17 17:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. Yes i removed it, thats totally fine;). Have a nice evening.--Matrix17 18:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Hopeful Adoptee

Hello, it'd be great if you could adopt me. I've been using wikipedia for more than a year now, and I feel its time to put something back! Thanks. --Dataspinner 14:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Source?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Since you were responsible for undoing the revision that removed the statement about Alexi Laiho's marriage, I thought I'd draw to your attention my question on the talk page. FalseLobster 05:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:LAME

Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

POV? How? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

That's a terrible reason to revert me. If someone feels that some of those entries are actually funny, they can either put them back or discuss on the talkpage. You can't just revert me willy-nilly for the mere act of being BOLD. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't say you were being bold. I said I was. And the fact is, you shouldn't revert people simply for being bold. If other people do not wish the information to be deleted, then they can undelete - that's what we have article histories for. If I dispute that, then we take it to talk, that's how Wikipedia works. Please don't revert people simply because you think others MIGHT object. Let them actually object. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 15:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Your concern that I might get into trouble is very considerate of you. You will do well on Wikipedia in the coming months, methinks. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Celebutante

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Meh, I'm not at all attached to the article, I just thought the speedy tag didn't really apply, so I'd try to rewrite it a bit. After I did some work on it, I saw it had already gone through one Afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebutante a long time ago. So it probably should be prodded. To be honest, I just really like portmanteau words even silly ones...;) If you prod it, I certainly won't remove the tag. Cheers. Dina 16:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Take a look and tell me what you think...my usual genre is a little less fluffy, but the etymology of the word proved a bit more interesting than I had suspected. Dina 18:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Adam ?Schutler

I just needed information.

Thanks