Sahmejil

2009 Lions tour

Excellent work on pulling that article into better shape --Bcp67 (talk) 06:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry if it looks like I'm taking exception to everything you do! There's nothing personal about it and its great to see someone getting involved who clearly wants to make the article as good as possible and who also wants to a make real contribution to WP:RU. --Bcp67 (talk) 19:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Naming convention.

I'm not sure where it was discussed, but I'm sure it's in the archives somewhere. I think the upshot was that we fell in line with other sporting projects adopting the same schemes. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Francois Pienaar image

I would suggest having a look at the images on Flickr. Provided that an image is marked there as being free or Creative Commons, it can be uploaded here. – PeeJay 10:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Francois Steyn Springbok.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Francois Steyn Springbok.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bryan Habana in Springbok change kit.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bryan Habana in Springbok change kit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Bismarck du Plessis.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bismarck du Plessis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Rugby Pics

Firstly let me say, thank you for adding those pics but please next time remember to add the licence too all the images and I have seen that you added a few images in commons as well. I'd like to ask you upload these images to commons as well as it allows those images to be used across wikimedia in all language wikis which may have an article on that certain player and ww2censor, please don't just tag images for deletion before checking out all the users uploads as they may have forgotten to add the licences as that section of wikimedia is definitely hard for most new users to understand...--Warpath (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

uhm yes, I added those licenses because admins on this wiki are quite trigger happy. they'll just delete blindly. make sure to add those licences next time you upload a pic and yes Great job, hope u may get more pics during the Europe tour..haha :) .. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warpath (talk • contribs) 09:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

List of rugby union players banned for eye gouging

Hi. I'm proposing a change in article name here:- Talk:List of rugby union players banned for eye gouging if you would like to input. GainLine ♠ _♥ 13:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Rugby union player categories

Since we discussed this at User_talk:BrownHairedGirl#CFD-Rugby_players.2Ffootballers, I thought I'd point you towards my nomination of lots of sub-categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 27#Rugby_union_players. I have also notified WT:RU. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Springboks list

Ok that would explain it. Thanks for letting me know : ) Jevansen (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

St. George's Park, Port Elizabeth

Quick question, which I'm hoping you'll know the answer to. Is St. George's Park, PE, the same ground as the "Crusader (or Crusaders) Ground", used in the past for rugby union tests? Cheers. --Bcp67 (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry... I only know it for its current cricket usage. The "Boet Erasmus" ground was the traditional home of Eastern Cape Rugby, at least in the last few decades. Have never heard of the Crusader/s in SA, only in the modern NZ Superrugby franchise sense. Hope you manage otherwise!Sahmejil (talk) 16:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I should have actually checked the article before I asked you 0 St George's Oval actually says it also known as the Crusaders Ground! According to a cricket book I've got here it was used as a venue for test rugby until 1955. Thanks for getting back to me anyway, and all the best.--Bcp67 (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

super rugby

Hello, i would like to inform of a discussion on in the WikiProject Rugby Union discussion page about the format to be used through the season articles of the super 12, super 14 and super rugby seasons. Please click the link below and have your opinion, thank you. JaFa 01 (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Link: Discussion

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC))

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sahmejil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sahmejil. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)