Saint Soren

Welcome

Hello, Saint Soren, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Darkwind (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Saint Soren! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 03:52, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mummy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evisceration and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

I'm really excited to see you working to improve Mummy--here's some coffee to keep you going. If you ever get this promoted to GA or FA, be sure to ping me so I can give you the Half Million or Million Award if nobody beats me to it. Thanks for all you're doing! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Mmm, coffee. I appreciate it, thanks! I will definitely let you know if I get the article promoted. My main goal when I started the improvements was to get the article reinstated to GA status. -- Saint Soren (talk) 01:27, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I just finished up the major elements of the overhaul for Mummy and submitted it to be reviewed for GA status! Here's hoping I did well enough! -- Saint Soren (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		For your contributions to the article Mummy! gidonb (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much!!! -- Saint Soren (talk) 23:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar. I am glad to see someone who is interested in and willing to clean up and improve articles. Wikipedia has many good articles but there are a surprising number of articles that are incomplete or need cleanup. Keep up the good work. Donner60 (talk) 15:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DooroftheDeadatStPeters.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DooroftheDeadatStPeters.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.flickr.com/photos/rich_gibson/98549581/ (licence at source is CC BY-NC-SA). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Nice work on the article Xin Zhui! I nominated it for DYK. You might wish to keep an eye on the nomination page: Template:Did you know nominations/Xin Zhui. Thanks for the awesome article. Zanhe (talk) 07:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Xin Zhui

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Guanche mummies

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Guanche mummies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Glad to hear it! Thanks! Saint Soren (talk) 04:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Great work on mummies!!

Hi, Saint Soren! I am impressed of your overhaul on Mummy. At Disembowelment, I made a note from James Cook, who mentioned that some Pacific Islanders used mummification, and then by the technique of transanal evisceration. Quote and link are found under Embalming section on Disembowelment, if you have interest.Arildnordby (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The text, from a 1784 text, on pages 361-362 can be found here http://books.google.no/books?id=SkwbAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:wtDeWWFNCcUC&hl=no&sa=X&ei=sWKfUqzqBsqG4ASXmoDICw&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=putrefaction&f=false Arildnordby (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mummy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mummy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SlimVirgin -- SlimVirgin (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Glad to hear it, thanks! Saint Soren (talk) 04:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mummy

The article Mummy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mummy for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SlimVirgin -- SlimVirgin (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Guanche mummies

The article Guanche mummies you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Guanche mummies for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mummy

The article Mummy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mummy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SlimVirgin -- SlimVirgin (talk) 20:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Guanche mummies

The article Guanche mummies you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Guanche mummies for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Mummy-related

Hi, I have noticed that you are supporting a possible page creation for Mummy (undead) to be split from Mummy. Besides having to put a template for the Mummy franchise on the main page, I have left a message on the talk page about having the possible split reserved for the Mummies of different media appearances (though Imhotep and Kharis already have their pages) like the Mummies that appeared in Mad Monster Party?, Mad Mad Mad Monsters, Gravedale High, Warcraft, AdventureQuest (and it's related games), The Cabin in the Woods (it was seen in some behind the scene photos), and Hotel Transylvania to name a few. Someone had already created a page for Skeletons which is said to be in need of references in external links. What do you think of this idead? --Rtkat3 (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Saint Soren! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)