Sakkosekk
Talkback: you've got messages!
editMessage added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome!
editHello, Sakkosekk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Dismas|(talk) 23:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey and thanks for the quick response.
Yes i have read through all of those but still i cannot figure out why my edit is regarded as information from a primary source? It is only this specific issue i am struggling on.
BR
Sakkosekk
- See the responses you've had thus far at the Help Desk. Dismas|(talk) 00:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Sakkosekk, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Sakkosekk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Reference Errors on 10 February
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Cologne Business School page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
editHello, Sakkosekk. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Cologne Business School, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Spike Wilbury (talk) 04:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Che ranking.pdf listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Che ranking.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 07:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)