Salarsikandar.81

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Would you care to communicate with me? You've been warned so many times, yet you persist. Please explain. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Salarsikandar.81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well hello, yes i was warned but i didn't understand why is that so, because so many time i remove all the copyrighted material previously, and i fully respect wikipedia rules, i undo the previous deletion as i remove all the material which meets the wikipedia copyrights violation rules, i rewrite all the material, but i don't know from where without reading they put violate tag, you can go to history and check i fully rewrite the related article material in my own words, and just provided source of that material. I myself intentionally or unintentionally never violates any rule, being first a newcomer i did mistakes but later i overcome as i continue to know about wiki rules, last time i undo the change as other material is purely written in my style just source of information is provided. I think i should not be blocked because i did not add any copyright material because all the copyrighted material is removed by me a while ago. But you guys juts put me on blocked, why is that so i really don't know. I fully follow the rules and didn't put any copyrighted material after first warning, thats why i ignore second warning because i review my work and i dint find any violation, seriously i am not lying. Please i am appealing for 'UNBLOCK' and in future i will take care of that. The undo material for my related page is fully written in my style you can review it and compare it. Please do not block me i have wiki project to do so and the page i have to update it daily. what proof you want? how can i provide you? let me know.

Decline reason:

It's clear to me from this edit made shortly before the block that you still, your protestation above to the contrary, have no idea what you're doing wrong. And I further believe, from your request, that perhaps your English isn't adequate enough for what you're attempting to do. Maybe you would be more comfortable editing the Wikipedia in your native language, whatever that is? — Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Myra Sajid

The article Myra Sajid has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Hum Awards pre-show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hum Awards pre-show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Awards pre-show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished, or remove comments from the discussion.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)