July 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Khyber Girls Medical College—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 18:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, Salman1911k!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

August 2022

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Punjab, Pakistan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization Talk 05:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bagh-e-Naran (November 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Salman1911k! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 18:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pak International Medical College (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pak International Medical College (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pak International Medical College (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 05:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Hayatabad did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 09:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bagh-e-Naran (April 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:08, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pak International Medical College

edit

  Hello, Salman1911k. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pak International Medical College, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bagh-e-Naran (July 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Losipov (talk) 04:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Antony Blinken, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 10:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

tell [BLP violation] to stop, not me Salman1911k (talk) 10:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you to advance your agenda. If you don't have reliable sources for what you're trying to put in the article, it may not go in. —C.Fred (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Antony Blinken. —C.Fred (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

this can't be true Salman1911k (talk) 12:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 11:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
no :'( Salman1911k (talk) 12:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
How did you think you would be able to repeatedly add unsourced information that violated WP:BLP and not get blocked? —C.Fred (talk) 17:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply