Sanillin1
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Caste warning
editYour edits to Talk:Billava have so far consisted of demanding deletion without a policy based rationale, recommending we violate copyright by copying major chunks of a source (most of which wasn't even about the Billava), and the recommending we replace the contents of the Wikipedia article with that found in another wiki. Please read the above warning. Similarly, please read our guideline on reliable sources, our rule requiring information to be verifiable, and our policy forbidding original research. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Billava, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Arctic Kangaroo 08:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Billava, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Arctic Kangaroo 08:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
ANI
editHello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sanillin1. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
It makes no sense for an editor to post to start a thread on the dispute resolution noticeboard on a topic from which he or she is banned from editing. Doing so amounts to an attempt to get round the restriction on editing the article and its talk page. I am therefore rephrasing the ban, to make it a more general topic ban, and to avoid the need to deal with all sorts of edits that skirt round the edges of the exact wording of the ban. Note that the words "broadly construed" mean that any editing at all that can reasonably be regarded as related to the subject may be taken as being a violation of the ban. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.