User talk:SarekOfVulcan/Archive 26

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Svampesky in topic AfD wikietiquette query
Archive 20Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26

Happy New Year, SarekOfVulcan!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

  Administrator changes

 
  Stephen
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Nihiltres

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
  • Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
  • The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.

Thanks for keeping me blocked

As I told User:CityOfSilver at User talk:CityOfSilver#I don't want to be unblocked, I am dropping my appeal. I have no desire to deal with User:Feoffer's behavior.

I will also be off Wikipedia for a month or so, likely followed by the process of having my account removed.

Before I request vanishing from a bureaucrat, I would like to say --as a matter of constructive criticism-- the tone of Wikipedia bureaucrats has been insulting and snide and is not a small part of why I want out.

Evackost (talk) 03:08, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Books & Bytes – Issue 56

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

  Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

  Miscellaneous


AlisonW case request accepted

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 30, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your revert

Re this revert, I didn't notice until after I edited another section for over-capitalization. Can you say which chnages you think were sub-optimal, and which were OK (at least roughly)? Dicklyon (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Titles of offices would always be capitalized. "faith, hope, charity" is Just Wrong. You could make a case for lowercasing "Assembly", if you had to, but "grand assembly" would be just as wrong as "house of representatives". SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
And per WP:CAPS, Standard or commonly used names of an office are treated as proper names. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:14, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
OK, I'll start over and follow MOS:OFFICE carefully. Dicklyon (talk) 01:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Take a look at my latest and let me know if I'm on a better track now. Dicklyon (talk) 01:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Better, but Master Mason, Worthy Advisor, Mother Advisor, Supreme Inspector, and Supreme Deputy should always be capitalized. (If you disagree on Master Mason, try changing it in Freemasonry first and see if you can make it stick.) SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
I think "always" ignores the advice at MOS:OFFICE, which says "is not plural, is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article), and is not a reworded description". Are you disagreeing with that, or is there something more special about these Freemasonry terms, or did I just get it wrong? Dicklyon (talk) 04:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

I opened a more general discussion at WT:WikiProject Freemasonry#Capitalization. Dicklyon (talk) 04:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Novem Linguae
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  MBisanz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

Freemasonry

FYI - We need to review the Freemasonry article. Fringe material has crept back in. Blueboar (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted for the AlisonW case

The proposed decision for the AlisonW case has been posted. Statements regarding the proposed decision are welcome at the talk page. Please note that comments must be made in your own section. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Jeff Immelt

Would you consider the latest edit under WP Voice. I'm trying to state an important fact without it sounding too critical, as a fact that just happens to be negative. Immelt presided over the most dramatic period in GE's history, something not reflected currently in the article's lead section. Knightoften (talk) 02:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Better, but I don't see where that citation references 2/3rd of its assets, which is pretty specific. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
@SarekOfVulcan: Found a better source and added the specific annual reports for coverage. In the original article I posted you had to piece the divestments together; it's the same in the new one but it's more specific, should be clearer. The annual GE reports list the asset shrink/subsidiaries during that period 2007-2017 Knightoften (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW closed

The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:

  • For failure to meet the conduct standards expected of an administrator, AlisonW's administrative user rights are removed. She may regain them at any time via a successful request for adminship.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW closed

Question (I don't know how to react and if this is against wp:policy)

Hello @SarekOfVulcan, I don't want to make it too long, but I have been personnally attacked multiple times on the same controversial article Juan Branco by an SPA (100%), and also an almost SPA (editing mostly this article or schools of the subject like Sciences Po) who both arrived after 2-6 months of inactivity in the sole purpose (it seems) to rollback my contributions (which consisted mainly of wp:translated content from the French B-class rated article). Also, I noticed that two contributors on the same page have an account name beginning and ending with the same letter (D......d) and both containing 8 characters. All that makes a bit much for me and, as I feel like I lost hours of work for nothing, and as I am still quite new here, I am wondering what I can do in this situation ? Can all that already be sanctionned if I report it ? Thanks, Imagritte (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

  • Suggestion improvements
  • Favorite collections tips
  • Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Bar Harbor, Maine

Hi SarekofVulcan,

Besides the "resort" in the very first line of the entry (which I wrote to you about separately), I'm baffled by why you would revert to the older census data when I provided the 2022 census number with the proper footnote. Can you explain what's motivating these reversions?

Thank you,

TEulenspiegel Eulenspiegel23 (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

There is no such thing as the 2022 Census. Wikipedia standard practice is to use the actual census numbers as far as possible. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
I see, you're right. It's only an estimate. Thank you for the clarification. Eulenspiegel23 (talk) 22:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
And the "resort" issue? Eulenspiegel23 (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Third sentence of the lead says, in effect, "or it's just a town that gets a lot of tourists". You're welcome to start a discussion on the article talk page and see if there's consensus for your change. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

When does a town have to accept the label of "resort town"?

I'm trying to remove "resort" from the opening line describing the town of Bar Harbor, Maine. I think this label does a disservice to the town in multiple ways. Both economically & culturally, Bar Harbor is defined more by its significant research institutions (one of which employs 1,400 locals), its college, fishing community, hospital and schools, than it is by tourism. But, it's also, like many desirable destinations, struggling with a severe housing crisis and overwhelming seasonable tourism. These threaten its year-round community, who can no longer find housing or afford to live here. What I'm trying to say is Bar Harbor is and is struggling to remain More Than a Resort/Tourist Town. Wikipedia choosing to label it a "resort town" when many equally inundated, over-"loved" towns/cities are not so designated seems arbitrary & unfortunate. Eulenspiegel23 (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

You'd probably get better results posting this on Talk:Bar Harbor, Maine, as I suggested above. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, still finding my way around. Eulenspiegel23 (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Firefangledfeathers
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Novem Linguae

  Technical news

  Arbitration



ANI close

Noting that you misspelled my name in your close of the ANI discussion. Also, just wondering, how did you figure out the consensus to be for one year? Not complaining, but just wondering as I don't remember seeing anyone state that they supported it only for a specific amount of time. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

My apologies - I looked at the spelling in Jayron's suggestion, and didn't refer back to make sure it was correct. As far as the length of time goes, since it wasn't discussed one way or the other in the survey that I noticed, I felt it was better to have a defined length of time, and that 1 year was the best duration to attempt. If it doesn't work, I would expect that more stringent sanctions would be placed quickly. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

  Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

SCB topic ban

FYI, Squared.Circle.Boxing reverted your notice of his GENSEX topic ban with the edit summary Won't affect my editing; won't prevent anything; notches on pitchforks lol.

I asked him if he could clarify whether this was him signaling that he intends to continue editing in the same disruptive manner with no regard for the topic ban, which he reverted with the edit summary Nope, I can not.

Just wanted to note this here, since I have no clue whether noting it at the closed ANI discussion would be appropriate or not. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:EC8D:3C81:53D4:D796 (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

You should really find something better to do. Embarrassing. – 2.O.Boxing 23:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I wouldn't phrase it quite the same way, but in any case, drop it. The ban is in place. If there are problematic edits later, that's the time to bring it up. Squared. Circle.Boxing is under no obligation to clarify future edits before they're made. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Gotcha, thanks! 2600:1700:87D3:3460:EC8D:3C81:53D4:D796 (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Block

Hey, seems like 2601:C7:4202:6720:D981:6102:6FF8:C06A is an alternate IP of 2601:C7:4202:6720:99B9:43D5:CE62:2BF6, someone you blocked recently. Seems like a range block is required. Vonkelonkel (talk) 14:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

  • New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
  • Tech tip: Filters
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

  Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Proposed deletion of File:SarekOfVulcan RFA 4 Trends.png

 

The file File:SarekOfVulcan RFA 4 Trends.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that has no foreseeable educational and encyclopedic purpose - out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page (@ commons) - talk} 14:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Always precious

 

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your help SarekofVulkan.

Thanks for your help and revision on Operative Masons, It took me a while to write all of that and I can see that the sources were not properly written, I will attempt to rewrite everything and resource it. HyperSite (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Note

Hello, I recently received a notice from your account, that I my recent article creation in Freemasonry might be a problem.

I recently joined the freemasonry project group and decided to work hard to add more quality and more content to Freemasonry.

I have been spending hundreds of hours writing articles and sourcing them to be able to flesh out the English version of our encyclopedia.

I do not mean to cause any confusion or be out of line in my edits. Let me know what you would like me to change. I am only aming to improve our encyclopedia. Do not hesitate to reach out and let me know.

All the best. HyperSite (talk) 22:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  0xDeadbeef
  Tamzin
  Dennis Brown

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery
 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

  Miscellaneous


Leonkoro Quartet

Thanks for your support on Draft: Leonkoro Quartet. Hyperman 42 (talk) 22:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

  • Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
  • Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

Nomination for deletion of Template:AbortionGSEN

 Template:AbortionGSEN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


ConFusion edits

I may have accidentally overwritten your recents edits to ConFusion. Please check and re-do them if needed. Gbeeker (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

  • Three new partners
  • Google Scholar integration
  • How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #83467

Footwiks Ok to unblock? Restore TPA? Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Can't see how either would help right now, but up to you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

 

  CheckUser changes

  Wugapodes

  Interface administrator changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

  Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

  Miscellaneous


Nomination of The FuMP for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The FuMP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The FuMP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

  Miscellaneous


Books & Bytes – Issue 61

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

  • Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
  • 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback on potentially biased block

You have protected the Autism Speaks article because you say it will always be a target for what you term 'vandalism'. However, I feel this does not take the source of the "vandalism", and what I feel is the consequential enshrining of one side in a controversy without allowing the other side an opportunity to be heard. The reason I looked up the article in the first place was to find out why the administrator of the r:/autism reddit requested that no posts linking to that organization be posted because so many autistic Reddit members found them objectionable or questionable. And all I was thinking of doing, when I found there wasn't even an acknowledgement in the Wikipedia article that there even WAS any such controversy, was to add a perspective note worded something like, "To be fair, it should be noted that some people feel / believe / have a different opinion " ... whatever language it takes to be sure both sides have been fairly presented. If removing the block is a non-starter ... and I can understand how that might not be as simple as it seems ... please, in the interests of justice and fairness, at least add such a note yourself Dan O Shanter (talk) 06:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Full protection on Changi Airport

Hello, can you revert back to the last stable version on Changi Airport prior to the dispute? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 13:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

No, I protected it at the version that stood when I got to it. Discuss on the article talk page. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
That's why I filed a report at WP:ANI/3RR. They did not bother to address the points I made on their talk page(s), and instead continued to edit war in the matter of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. Reverting to the previous stable version will give them the incentive to continue the discussion on the talk page like they should have, instead of persistently reverting. Also, they never bothered to address their COI editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 13:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
So by that logic, you now have incentive to discuss on the article talkpage, and I again suggest you do so. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Per this diff I explained the reasons why their edit was not an improvement on their talk page, and received no response. They instead kept edit warring in the edit summaries sticking to their own viewpoint. So who has the incentive to continue the discussion on the talk page exactly? Frankly speaking, protecting the page will not do anything as the other user showed no interest in continuing the discussion as long as their preferred logo is on the article. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 14:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
The IP has not edited since you left that message, and also, THAT IS NOT THE ARTICLE TALK PAGE. You want your change to stick, get consensus ON THE ARTICLE TALK PAGE. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure that you understand that the IP and Caskin3 are clearly the same person (or a meatpuppet), as the latter was registered right after the IPs last edit and continued to edit war with the same viewpoint right afterwards. Regardless of the venue, they showed no interest in continuing the discussion on their talk pages atter I left them multiple messages and warnings. Also, there is absolutely no need to WP:SHOUT here. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 14:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to join the Twenty Year Society

 

Dear SarekOfVulcan/Archive 26,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

  • IEEE and Haaretz now available
  • Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
  • Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Nyttend
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  Nihonjoe
 

  CheckUser changes

  Joe Roe

  Oversight changes

  GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Your recent RfA !vote

... has messed up the numbering of the !votes. I could easily fix it myself; but tampering with another editor's !vote seems a bad idea. Maproom (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but someone else already fixed it, and I'm fine with that. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards
 

  Bureaucrat changes

 
 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

  • One new partner
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

AfD wikietiquette query

I haven't participated much in AfDs yet, but does 'per above' usually mean the comment directly above mine, or all the comments above? Probably a stupid question, but your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Jenna Wilson was the polar opposite of mine and I didn't want it to seem like I was supporting the redirect with your opposing rationale, so I changed the wording. Svampesky (talk) 22:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

It means what you want it to mean. :) I think it would have been clear enough, but "per others" is clearer. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Svampesky (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)