Saskaboom

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to User:Saskaboom/sandbox while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Harold Orr

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Harold Orr, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

NPOV on Harold Orr

Hi Saskaboom,

Thanks for making the Harold Orr page and for adding lots of useful information to it. Your latest edit is a good example of where you're not always meeting Neutral point of view requirements. Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is important to follow this policy as best as possible. Moreover, it's important to make sure that information is well-referenced with reliable sources. Let me know if you'd like to discuss. Other justin (talk) 17:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

thanks Justin .. what is incorrect in my edit .. I am removing the changes I did .. but would like to understand what the problem is ... can you explain where the neutral point of view is crossed? Saskaboom (talk) 04:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Clarifications and Proposed Inclusions for Harold Orr Article

Dear Justin,

Thank you for your diligent review of the Harold Orr Wikipedia page. I appreciate the importance of adhering to a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) and ensuring that all information is well-referenced. I have gone through the feedback and I am willing to make necessary amendments to align with Wikipedia’s guidelines. if there are areas that you think should have more references I will attempt to find them ; However, I would like to discuss a few points that might merit reconsideration or inclusion to provide a well-rounded portrayal of Harold Orr’s life and contributions. Here are the areas of discussion:

1. Family Background and Early Life:
   • Harold Orr’s upbringing, rooted in community service and religious values, played a significant role in shaping his professional and personal endeavors. There are several reliable references detailing his family background and early life which contribute to understanding the motivations behind his community service initiatives.
2. Community Service and Religious Involvement:
   • Harold Orr’s contributions extend beyond his professional achievements in energy efficiency. His involvement with the Western Christian College; Oklahoma Christian University starting Greystone Singers and his community service are notable aspects of his life that had a significant impact on others. This facet of his life presents a holistic view of Harold Orr as an individual deeply ingrained in community betterment, which is well-documented.
3. Ancestry:
   • While the importance of ancestry might vary among individuals, it is historically notable and could have been a driving force behind Harold Orr’s community service and loyalty to causes. A discussion, backed by reliable references, could shed light on how historical and familial ties influenced Harold Orr’s lifelong commitments.
4. Ability to Convey Technical Information:
   • The 2017 Rob Dumont Energy Management Award https://www.emtfsask.ca/awards_winners_2017.htmlacknowledges Harold Orr’s ability to make technical issues easily understandable, which helped spread knowledge to a wider audience. This ability is a notable aspect of his legacy that contributed to the promotion of energy conservation both in Canada and abroad.

I am keen on collaborating to ensure that the article adheres to Wikipedia’s standards while also providing a comprehensive understanding of Harold Orr’s multifaceted life and contributions. I am open to further discussion on the talk page to reach a consensus on the inclusion of these aspects, with appropriate referencing to ensure verifiability and neutrality.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your feedback and working together to enhance the quality and completeness of the Harold Orr Wikipedia page.

Warm regards,

Saskaboom Saskaboom (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Heya, thanks for engaging in good faith on this. I'll reply here with some thoughts on the broader guidelines, and perhaps we can move discussion about specific points to the Harold Orr talk page. I'm very happy to help work on this, and we might also ultimately want to seek out some additional perspectives because we might disagree on certain points.

In general, I don't mean to question that much of what has been included in the article is significant in and of itself—to Orr and perhaps to different communities—but really just to what extent, and in what way, it merits inclusion in an encyclopedia entry about the subject. I am familiar with Orr's professional work, and I don't think there's any question that it had significant influence; from what I know, it's a stretch to say that, beyond particular communities, he is known for these other aspects. That doesn't mean that it can't be included, but perhaps that it needs to be dealt with a bit more delicately.

On that note, I think the main issue so far has been the way you phrased certain things. Wikipedia emphasizes neutral language. So, while it may be true that much of Orr's work exemplifies a commitment to community service, unless you are directly quoting a reliable/neutral source stating so, it is best to let the facts speak for themselves (i.e. readers will pick up on that by reading about the things he has done). Does that make sense? You might find it helpful to have a read through the guidelines on Biographies of living persons. Also, on sources, it is important to ensure that they speak to the subject. For instance, you previously included one from Oklahoma Christian University on its accreditation, but the reference didn't actually mention Orr anywhere. This is the kind of thing that can raise questions about just how relevant it is (again, for the purpose of inclusion in an encyclopedia).

If you don't mind, why don't you throw the four points you listed for consideration in to the Harold Orr talk discussion, and we can discuss those there? Thanks again! Other justin (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Saskaboom. Thank you for your work on Harold Orr. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)