User talk:Scorpion0422/Archive 10

Burns

edit

Well I haven't been able to find anything directly about Burns' voice, so you'll have to use the Reiss source for now. There is alot of sources which quote Shearer as saying Burns is his favourite character [1] and this talks about the effects of the voice on his throat [2]. I recall reading an interview with him a while back, in which he said the only voice he based on anyone was Skinner, but I can't remember for sure. I'll keep looking, but this is all I've got for now. Gran2 15:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just read The Simpsons Ride, great job on that. Anyway, someone added Christopher Lloyd's cameo to the guest stars list, so I was thinking of keeping it but expanding to a "guest stars in other media" section or something. I don't remember any of the adverts having guest stars, but I think a few of the video games did. Thoughts? Gran2 08:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for Review

edit

You're extremely active on the FLC page, and I was wondering if you'd be willing to leave a few comments about List of Atlantic Coast Conference football champions, which is currently a featured list candidate. I'm always glad to get as many opinions as possible, especially from people who aren't as familiar with college football. Thanks for your time. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Overhaul of FL criteria

edit

I've re-started the process here and am notifying the four candidates for director as well as advertising at FLC talk and FAC talk. Your input would be valued. Tony (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re your scrubbed-out comment at the overhaul page: yes, I find overlinking a significant problem in the lists I've reviewed. And because lists need to be strategically nested in relation to other articles, it's particularly important not to dilute the high-value links. Simple years, the names of anglophone countries, common words and repeated links are particular problems. That's why I'm just a little concerned at the new new Criterion 2, which is explicitly about links. It does say "appropriate"; but what do you think? Tony (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Springfield's state's flag.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Springfield's state's flag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

edit
Delivered: 14:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

1896 Summer Olympics medal count

edit

No problem, there's plenty of other stuff to work on. I just thought we were trying to get a number of them done before the 2008 games began, which puts it on kind of a cramped timeline. - Marrio (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Marrio (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLRC

edit

Hi. I'm certainally interested in running it. You caught me at a good time; I'm just here checking my messages at the momeent. I won't be back until the 14th when I move into my new apartment, and I doubt I'll be back on until then, but please keep me informed about whether either of us is selected. Cheers! αŁʰƏЩ @ 03:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLRC

edit

Hi. I'm interested (I'd like the volunteers to offer their services there too) but think some kind of opportunity for community consensus should be opened up. Perhaps a !vote of confidence in the idea/candidate/s? --Dweller (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK. Either way, I suggest once the vote closes you propose it at an appropriate Project talk page. --Dweller (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Success

edit

"Harry Shearer's Montgomery Burns is based on Lionel Barrymore and Ronald Reagan" - Keith Marder (1994-04-28). "Real People are Models for 'Simpsons' Voices". The Times Union. p. C4. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help) Gran2 06:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done it for you mate. Alientraveller (talk) 13:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
My interpretation was that it was his voice which was based on Barrymore and Reagan, and it had quotes from Harry and Hank. But meh. Gran2 19:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Congratulations! (Raul never warned me about the god help you part. :-) Let me know if you ever need an ear, when the "god help you" part kicks in :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! Cirt (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

And now on to Wikipedia:FCDW/May 12, 2008, May 12 Dispatch, to cover new director, general FL issues, etc. They never publish on time; it should be ready by the 13th, and if you all throw some text in there, Tony1 and Jbmurray usually copyedit. Gotta get moving :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi,

I edited the dates because most of them were broken. Others were camouflaged as simple year links that nobody ever clicks on. The broken date thing is complicated to explain but it is all at wp:mosnum. I am sure others will explain. Hope that helps. Lightmouse (talk) 01:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria

edit

Scorpion,

Congratulations on your appointment. I wonder if you'd like to comment on the latest two proposed drafts of the criteria by Tony and myself. You've got to be happy with them. Please suggest any changes you'd like and what aspects you prefer. Colin°Talk 08:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, Mr Director, Sir

edit

Well done. I offer you my support. Starting with helping out with the debate over the criteria. --Dweller (talk) 09:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May I asked why you closed it as "not promoted"? I had taken care of every single comment on that page... « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 21:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you suggest just re-nominating it? « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 22:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLD

edit

Congratulations! I hope everything works out. Have you set any new policies? I hope you keep taxes low and keep us out of too many wars. It looks like User:Sephiroth BCR will not be catching you at WP:WBFLN any time soon. I hope I your new role does not impose on my experiment because I know you have expressed preferences for other methods. I will of course be running WP:LOTM and WP:LOTD as usual and voting just commenced for this month. My talk page is always open.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I apologize about the notices. I still think you should keep an open mind on the experiment I am running. It has its advantages for you as an FLD. If you took part by analyzing and voting, it would help you to monitor lists needing review and it would help you guage preferences if you monitored the voting of others.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Springfield (The Simpsons) GA

edit

Do you think this artice is ready for GA yet? I am thinking of nominating it pretty soon. I haven't done as much to this article as you have, but I feel I helped out. Lemme know and I will see that it gets through. <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 05:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Legitimising your role at FLC

edit

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_candidates#Director.3F. Tony (talk) 11:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Miinnesota canoe

edit

In Seven Wonders of Canada, the the yellow wood-and-canvas canoe is mine, and it was in fact made in and photographed in Ely, Minnsota. Why do you want to hide that fact? If you do, why not show a Canadian-made canoe? Motorrad-67 (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You should delete all the locations of canoes because none of them are specific. Right? Or, find a Canadian canoe if you don't want just this single canoe's location identified. Be consistent. Or, are you just anti-American? Motorrad-67 (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey

edit

Hi! Thanks for your note. I'm afraid I've been rather out of it (not to mention off wiki) in the last few days so I'm going to need a few days to catch up with the copious discussions that have been on-going. There are a number of FLCs on which I've commented extensively which are heading for a decision, I guess since I've been involved then I ought not take a leading role in closing those particular ones. In the meantime I'll spend some time on the criteria discussion and get back to you. I'll follow your lead in the mechanics of closure for a bit, if you don't mind, and try to provide a "overseer" role to those FLCs which I have yet to comment on and which could use some assistance. Feel 100% free to smack me down if I foul up and by all means email me or use my talk page to call me a fool... All the best, and well done on the FLD result, good to see your hard work hasn't gone un-noticed. Best, The Rambling Man (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cool. Sounds like a good division of labour to me. I'll also be nom'ing FLs so we can do each other's dirty work. So, to the criteria....! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I couldn't think of two better candidates than Matthew and Dweller to deal with FLRC's. I assume either of us would still remain responsible for the ultimate promotion...? I'll do my best to do a few promotions where applicable so I get to grips with what I'm doing! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't really see why. They'd be "responsible" without any necessary requirement for said responsbility to be publicly affirmed. Since we would promote, they would be guardians, like Sandy for example, of the process. I think just making sure they're happy with the processes and to-be agreed criteria would be sufficient. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Matthew's off for at least another week, Dweller seems keen to help, let's wait until we get 2/2 and then announce it. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Please see my new post under the Logo section of the talk page for my reasons.--Snowman Guy (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dispatch copy-edit etc

edit

Thanks for your note; please check here. Tony (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You may want to take a look at the above FLC. I have a feeling this may be in need of a premature archiving. Oh and if you ever need any help over at FL, just let me know. Congrats on making what you already did official. « Gonzo fan2007 (talkcontribs) @ 06:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comments, I have enacted your requests on the said list. Hello32020 (talk) 01:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Principal and the Pauper

edit

Sure, I'll post a to-do list. Zagalejo^^^ 23:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of Pittsburgh Steelers head coaches

edit

May I ask why "Not Promoted" for this? There were 2 supports, and I'm pretty sure TRM's concerns were all addressed. « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 00:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I had the same question. The album had two supports and a "mild oppose" from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), of which I fixed all of the suggestions. I left two reminders on Rambling Man's talk page, but he failed to respond. I guess I went over the limit of days on the Canidate list, but it would have been promoted with his support, right? So should I just re-nominate it? Thanks! Blackngold29 05:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AC/DC discography

edit

Why was the list archived? I was getting to work on indopug's oppose, even though some of the things he listed were already discussed and all the previous concerns were addressed. No-Bullet (TalkContribs) 02:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for your comments, I have addressed them. Would you care to take another look and see if there is anything else ? Have a nice day. Rosenknospe (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFA Thanks - oh yes, and about those Simpsons articles...

edit

Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations.

On a side note, apologies for the delays in copy-editing; my whole family’s been sick the last two days so even getting as far as logging in has been a challenge. I saw that the one on FAC was archived the same day of your request, and that others are working on sorting it out a bit, so I will leave that one aside for now but keep it on my watchlist. Meanwhile, Sideshow Bob and Krusty are still at the top of my list. Best, Risker (talk) 15:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Asking people to support FLCs

edit

He had already supported the list once, I was just pointing it out that it had been re-nominated, since he may not have realized that it was the original nomination. If I do that again I will be sure to be more neutral. Thanks! Blackngold29 23:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Green Wing (series 2)

edit

As I said before in the nomination, if the list fails to be promoted, then I will merge the lists. If it does get promoted, there won't be a merger. ISD (talk) 07:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would consider. I probably wouldn't, but I would consider it. ISD (talk) 06:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

When/if you close this, TRM's concerns were taken care of, and his reply is here. Thanks, « Milk's Favorite Cookie ( talk / contribs) 20:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! and stuff

edit

Congratulations on becoming the director of FLs, I know you'll continue to do a fine job. Also, I'm back online now, later than planned due to move-in stress, and I'm still interested and willing to be involved in the FLRC process in whatever way you and TRM are thinking, assuming that the offer is still on the table. Regards, -- αŁʰƏЩ @ 21:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

5/17 DYK

edit
  On 17 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of IIHF World Championship tournaments, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 22:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of best selling albums FL

edit

I have left a question regarding your oppose at the FL review, nothing major. Cheers. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 08:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of German World War II jet aces

edit

I believe every comment has been addressed. Could you please revisit the article and give last suggestions. MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

edit
Delivered: 19:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Guidlines!

edit

Guidlines make everything fun.. How would you like to impose these guidlines on the list of recurring characters?

1. 99% of all celebrity appearances are non-canon and should not be inlcuded in the recurring character article.

2. Characters should be referred to as what other characters call them, or what the writers/producers have said.

3. All characters appearing in cutaway jokes should not be included in the recurring articles. Any character who makes three appearances or more can be safely counted as a character.

4. All characters who are central characters in the storyline of a single episode but do not make anymore appearances should not be inlcuded in the recurring character article. (Examples: Jack Crowley, Dwight Diddlehopper, Julia)

5. All characters who are central characters in the storyline of two or more episodes should be included in the recurring character article.

6. Abandoned characters should be dropped. That is to say, characters from more than ten years/seasons ago shouldn't be included as recurring.- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 22:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survivor Series (2005)

edit

Thank you for reviewing this article, I really appreciate it. Anyway, I believe I have addressed all of your concerns for the article; however, I could not find a source to back up the claim the the Long vs. Bischoff match was voted WON's worst match of the year. Although I don't believe it's necessary for it to be mentioned, it wouldn't hurt if it was. Regards, –LAX 23:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I might have a look at it tomorrow. If it's no trouble to you, could you please review Judgment Day (2007)? –LAX 23:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! It's fairly short and shouldn't be much of problem. –LAX 23:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have fixed your two concerns. –LAX 00:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

FL Review

edit

Hi there. I'm unsure of how this is going at the moment. Is the plan to hold another !vote, or is a simple announcement going to be made about me and Dweller? I noticed that Tony has a thread about it, and that Dweller said he'd prefer to go through a consensus-type thing, which is fine by me. Regards, -- Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 00:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Presidents' Trophy

edit

Which official website are you talking about when you say that they've led the league 17 times? You didn't provide a link. MrArticleOne (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm a little confused. My initial question was what official website you were talking about that you got the 18 figure from. You sent me a page at the team's website. However, the page from the team's website says they did finish 1st in 1933-34, but I assume this is talking about their finish within the Division, not the League (in 1934, they did finish 1st in the American Division). I can't make out what the left-most banner in that image says on it, and I have never been to their arena, so I am not sure what makes you think it says 1933-34. So, in short, I'm confused on two things: (1) why you think that left-most banner is from 1933-34, and (2) where you saw or derived that 18 figure. After doing a little research, I think what it probably says is actually 1932-33; that season, Detroit finished tied with Boston atop the league standings but Boston won the tiebreaker. Perhaps the league didn't recognize the tiebreaker for banner purposes? MrArticleOne (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can't make out anything on the left-most banner in that image; it just gets all garbled. I'm hesitant to just write it off like that without more proof. It just seems really odd that an NHL team would make such a blatant error and that nobody would correct it, don't you think? MrArticleOne (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for your kind welcome. I read the pages and there is a lot of participants. (I also love the barnstar with the doughnut, like my name). I just did a re-write, extension and more detailed plot to Pray Anything, which I think is a large contributions. I also added some refs to Secrets of a Successful Marriage. Once again, Thanks. Doughnuts...Mmm! (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Backlog

edit

Yeah, sorry about not being there lately, bad timing with other 'issues'. Presumably you're referring to old FLCs which, by now, have lapsed and need to be closed as unsuccessful? I'll get on to it asap (probably first thing tomorrow morning), and you ought to be aware that I'm away for two weeks as of this weekend. Hope all is good. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

While we were out...

edit

...perhaps Dweller and Matthew (either or both) can step in while either (or both) of us are away? I'll be back, all things being well, by 7 June 2008 and won't be away for the rest of the summer... The Rambling Man (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Yep, that's fine. We just need to wait for OTRS to confirm you e-mail and then we should be able to use them. Gran2 15:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just keeping you updated

edit

Over the weekend I promoted List of San Diego Chargers head coaches List of Vancouver Canucks players, List of German World War II jet aces and Highlander: The Series (season 1). They'd been FLCs for close to a month, with no opposes, and enough supports. TRM hadn't given any further feedback since his first comments, but I checked the articles closely and I think he'd consider that they were all addressed satisfactorily. Keeping them there for another 2 weeks until he returns I felt wasn't really a good idea. There's still 50 candidates! I also closed List of Marmalade Boy chapters at the nominee's request. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 08:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Einstein's publications: No. There's still a few MOS issues regarding quote marks around chapters and titles, and I noticed that all the "blah blah of publication #142 above" in the notes column not being correct when sorted in any order than its natural state (they often end up being below). The nominator went away for the week on the 23rd though so they might not be addressed for a few more days, so it's up to you. I'm the only opposer so far. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 20:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Remember how pages used to be, back in September, with season nineteen pages? 12- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 15:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kang and Kodos

edit

Reviewing this article, and the article needs a lot of work before being promoted to GA. miranda 02:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Troy McClure

edit

Hi. Could you explain exactly what I did wrong here [3]? Awbizkomeydownstar (talk) 03:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

What part of that page does it violate? The Modern Language Association requires that one use brackets to indicate that a quotation has been altered. See this site. Just because you haven't seen something on Wikipedia doesn't mean it's wrong. (Granted, not every style guide requires brackets around a single letter, but I thought I should cover all my bases.)
In any case, your version was definitely wrong. That quote was being introduced as an independent statement, which was operating outside the flow of the rest of the sentence. It had to begin with a capital letter, unless you were to alter the rest of the sentence to make it fit. (I ended up doing the latter.)
I'm not trying to start a fight over this. I've just noticed that many Wikipedia editors have trouble integrating quotations into their prose. It wouldn't hurt to brush up on some of the basics. Awbizkomeydownstar (talk) 03:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adminship

edit

Hey. You've probably been asked this before, but you are clearly a great article writer and a huge contributor to FLC. As a result, I would like to nominate you for adminship at WP:RFA if you're interested. So long as you know what you would use the tools for, it shouldn't be a problem. LEt me know of your decision. Wizardman 00:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

earth quake

edit

Hello, I believe the earth quake has something to do with Olympic as it is a reverse point of international influence and chinese feelings upon the world. From this point there is no boycott thing on both sides and the tibetan issue is no longer a focus. if you believe earthquake has nothing to do with the games, then tibetan issue has nothing to do with the games either. Synyan (talk)

k, but we could refine the article and let it meet the encyclopedia standard, cant we. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synyan (talkcontribs) 00:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
k, i'll do it later. thanks for your advice. Synyan (talk) 00:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
rv. Still no reason why it belongs in controversy, (and while I admit the section is obviously anti-Chinese, we should also avoid becoming too pro-Chinese) -- I give up. Whatever... Synyan (talk) 02:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

URGENT: article on FSC for the WP Signpost

edit

Hi, Suddenly we're filling a gap in the weekly Signpost Dispatch section with an article on Featured Sounds, and I'll have to do it within a day. I'm contacting several people on the history page, you among them, who might be able to review the draft (I hope it will be written in about 12 hours' time). Can you suggest anyone else? Do you know anyone who's been around from the start, who might know more about the history of the page? I guess I can find it via the edit histories. TONY (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Simpsons Ride Entrance Photos

edit

"Simpsonsride2"shows the entrance from across the othe side of the park, and during the construction period, While my own photo shows it close up. "Simpsonsride1" can be used as a substitute for the klogo, since it's of the main sign (not of the entramce) and the logo is seen in it, though it was also taken during the construction period.--Snowman Guy (talk) 22:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

My freind took the Image and gave me a copy of it, and that's not the reason I'd like to see it in the article. As I said before, It shows the Krusty head entrance close-up, and "Simpsonsride2" shows it far away, with walls in front of it. But, I'm not in any mood for accomplishment. Do what you think best fits the article then. Or, I could crop the Image and get rid of the two people in it.--Snowman Guy (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'll agree to the image you have currently added, Though it would also be nice if we could fuind a photo of the Hollywood building which shows the whole thing.--Snowman Guy (talk) 23:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Is there a free or flickr image we could use that shows the whole Hollywood building?--Snowman Guy (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

TMcC

edit

So how'd the TFA go? My internet router broke and I've only just been able to replace it. Anything else happen over the last three days? Gran2 13:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks like permission has been ratified for the images. Would you like me to crop the best infobox shots avaliable? Gran2 18:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah that's fine. I think the only individuals (going by the basis of who has an article, who doesn't) that we'll need, and are possible to get, are Okaley, Weinstein (and we could ask Bill for a more up to date one of each of them) and Jeff Martin from Simpsons writers1.jpg. And from Simpsons writers2.jpg: David Stern, Lona Williams, John Swartzwelder and a (small) George Meyer. Gran2 19:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, still uploading (this new Commons form is moronic). Do we need the Conan image from Simpsons writers2.jpg? The one on his own is better. Gran2 20:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Abraham Simpson

edit

You both need to chill out and discuss it on Abe's talk page! Ctjf83Talk 16:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I started a post here Ctjf83Talk 16:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
dunno if you are going to respond to that or not...but actually, did they actually say he got a divorce from Mona? They were obviously separated while she was in hiding, but never officially said a divorce. Ctjf83Talk 17:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Always some jerk trying to screw something up. I'm not familiar with marriage laws, since I can't in 96% of the country...but when your spouse dies, are you automatically divorced from them? Would it just be a widow/widower? I'm not sure Ctjf83Talk 17:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Why don't you talk to .:Alex:. and smooth over any drama you two have!! Ctjf83Talk 17:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
We need way in here about what family members should be included in info boxes Ctjf83Talk 17:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLC closings and junk

edit

First off good job so far as FLC director and stuff. I was wondering if you could do something to help everyone out. Lately when you've closed FLCs, you've done a bunch at a time (the one you just did was 12 I believe). That's great, but do you think you could split them up into more then one edit, so that you're not forced to say "2 more" in the edit summaries? I imagine there's others such as myself that watch the edits on the FLC pages to see which ones passed and failed, mainly by yours or Rambling Man's edit summaries, so "2 more" isn't really helpful. Anyways, just wanted to bring that up. Great job so far. Drewcifer (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

My suggestion is to close the ones you promote in one edit and the ones you archive in another edit. It was easier for me to split them up. By the way, I just closed 2006 Winter Olympics medal count per your message at my talk page.--Crzycheetah 05:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

New FLRC instructions?

edit

Hi Scorpion. I've taken the bull by the horns. Please criticise. Wikipedia talk:Featured list removal candidates. PS why no ToC on that talk page? TONY (talk) 06:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scorpion, would you please mind reinstating the Detroit Red Wings FLC? I was in the middle of revaming the table – and incase you didn’t notice, there was an {{inuse}} template. I was almost done, just receiving Matthew’s comments 2 days ago. Furthermore, the FLC instructions clearly state:


Thanks, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 14:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not complaining - I apologize if I do sound that way. I had the {{inuse}} on the article, was actively editing it, and assumed you would know this and would not close the FLC. Would you mind simply reinstating the FLC? It's not that I mind your decision, its just that I didn't have enough time to address the remaining concerns. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 15:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Swartzwelder.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Swartzwelder.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

edit
Delivered: 21:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

FLC

edit

Hey, did you forget to remove Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in the West Midlands from FLC in this edit [4]? Was going to remove it myself but wanted to check. Thanks Suicidalhamster (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

done FYI Gary King (talk) 15:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, since you are a director, your thoughts on Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_candidates#Editintro_for_FLC_nominations.3F please Gary King (talk) 15:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

s18 Titles

edit

Check this source, and you'll see various listings. Click on an episode, and you'll discover how the titles are correctly spelled according to the official FOX releases, and not a ridiculous parody of Stop, or My Mom Will Shoot!, but simply Stop or My Dog Will Shoot.- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 18:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the SoMDWS move. Regardless, I've never ever deleted a page, so I've manually moved KGV1&2.- Yours truly, Sυρєrıor reply 14:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLC idea

edit

Hey Scorpion. Thanks for your note. Yeah, no reason why not. I did a Good Article drive a while ago and in a month they reduced their 150-odd review backlog to next-to-nothing, all with the temptation of the odd barnstar etc. Got to remember we're still striving for the "best of Wikipedia" mind you so sprinting for featured success may be a little inappropriate, but as long as the finished products meet the criteria and either of us are happy then I guess it's a win-win scenario. So... how do you promote it and how do you bound the contest? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

As long as I somehow end up a winner then it's fine by me. Gary King (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well we're guaranteed one with Gary! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, sounds good. I particularly like being weak and unremarkable. Makes a big change from me saving the universe on a minute-by-minute basis... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well don't rely on Tony, he's a very busy guy when he gets a chance to spend time on Wikipedia. But yeah, worth an ask... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm an IRC noob. I've got no idea, really. I should do. But for the moment, no I'm not. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
IRC yay. WP:IRCT. Gary King (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm on the Wikipedia channel now (I think!) but it's all a very new and confusing experience for such a technofool (despite being an engineer..) The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure if you're using the same text to let everyone know, but you spelled "Greetings", "Grettings". BTW, I put my name down for it :) Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 18:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the contest, I've been thinking that if the reasoning behind it is to garner some extra attention to WP:FL, then perhaps you should hold off for a couple of week or so. If you notified the WP:Village Pump, the WP:Signpost, and a few other places, there'd be more people who haven't put forward a FL before who may be willing to enter. Right now the only entrants are the regular FL nominators, and that I think, won't draw much attention to the project. Just a thought. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 01:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Works for me! Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 01:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry at FLC

edit

Hello Scorpion, I just wanted to notify you that User:Alive Would? Sun, who nominated a-ha discography and List of a-ha awards for FLC, is indefinitely blocked on suspicion of being a sock-puppet. indopug (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Contest

edit

Nuts, fine. :P --Golbez (talk) 19:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

FL contest

edit

Thanks for the invite, but my life is going to be a hectic for the next week or so. If you run a similar a competition again, let me know. Tompw (talk) (review) 20:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

To be sure, with Thursday you mean today (my time)? If so, that is fast. I will try to find a topic then today.Garion96 (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Contest

edit

This seems more sports-like, but does List of Major League Baseball ERA champions, fall under the "awards" category? What about World Series MVP Award? Thanks, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 23:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would List of films 5 or More Competitive Awards (still to create) be approved? « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 00:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
The info from here, I think I can handle a new list creation. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 00:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looked around, couldn't find anything. What exactly should I rename it to? « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 01:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

FLC withdrawals

edit

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of a-ha awards and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/a-ha discography should be withdrawn since there is no one left to resolve any issues. Gary King (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TNDLHMarvin Monroe.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:TNDLHMarvin Monroe.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

I removed myself from the contest because I'm not sure if I have time to dedicate to it. Gary King (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Onlyinclude

edit

Why is it there? I can't see what it is accomplishing. Srnec (talk) 23:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Incident at The Simpsons Ride

edit

According to this article, guests riding the ride were sprayed with vegetable oil. Should this be cited in the article?--Snowman Guy (talk) 00:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Lists

edit

Hey dude. Hope you're ok. Just wanted to quickly chat out what our roles seem to be evolving into at FLC... Not really surprisingly, you're doing the majority of the closures and promotions etc. I think what would be best for me to do is to focus on the "backlog" lists and try to get them tidy, MOS-compliant etc. Obviously when either of us is "away" we need to cover the tasks completely but otherwise, is this a fair appraisal and are you okay with it? On another note, competition seems to be taking off nicely! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok cool well let's carry on as we are. I like the look of some of the contest lists too, very interesting topics... The Rambling Man (talk) 15:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Denver

edit

Hi. Just curious, why did you close Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Denver before my comment could be addressed? Zagalejo^^^ 05:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I left a message with the nominator. I think it's an easily fixable problem, so I don't think we'll have to worry about FLRC. Thanks for the reply. Zagalejo^^^ 06:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Flc#Kill_Bill

edit

I suggest withdrawing the nomination, per the reasons cited in the nomination. Gary King (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of members of the Hockey Hall of Fame

edit

Heh, by time I got back to List of members of the Hockey Hall of Fame to fix my <ref>...</ref> typos, I got caught in your Edit conflict. Ok, now I see the info on the 18 member committee info on Hockey Hall of Fame. But, it is buried in the text and listed in an "As of..." format, which will eventually be edited off as new members are added. It makes sense to me to have the actual electors for a given year right handy by that years inductees. Not sure if it belongs on the HHOF article or the List of members article or in some other spot. Ideas? — MrDolomite • Talk 21:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: your reply on my talk page. Gotcha, thx for the info. While I don't forsee the need for each inductee class to have its own article, I'll ruminate about other options for how to incorporate that info. — MrDolomite • Talk 21:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apologies

edit

Sorry for the debris on your page, I'm not sure if you knew, but ChrisP2K5 has a bit of a stalker in banned user User talk:Hdayejr. He's been banned for quite a while, but still comes back to make attacks on ChrisP2K5 and other editors. His most recent bouts of sockpuppetry have been detailed here (2nd). Since as a banned user he's not allowed to edit wikipedia, I've undone his edits to your page. I just wanted to let you know. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of heads of state of Gabon/archive1

edit

Why did you fail Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of heads of state of Gabon/archive1? I adressed all the concerns that could be humanly adressed. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 13:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Moonlight episodes

edit

Hey there. I have two supports for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Moonlight episodes. Can you promote the article to FL? Corn.u.co.pia Disc.us.sion 08:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copy edit requests for Simpsons articles

edit

Hi Scorpion - I must apologise for being extremely delinquent in getting your requested copy edits finished off. I've rejuggled my backlog, and your three articles should be all done by the time you get back from holiday (I should get them done this weekend, but then I've said that before). I see that there's a bit of a team feeling to the pages, so with a little luck others on the team will be able to respond to any questions I have. Hope you have a good time away. Risker (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

edit
Delivered: 17:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Principal and the Pauper

edit

I'll keep an eye on it. Zagalejo^^^ 17:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, will do. Gran2 19:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

new quote

edit

is that something from Starship Troopers? or similar?! Either way I like it enormously. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cool well luckily I should be around for most of that period. I'll do the business...! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Simpsons, right? Great quote. Dayewalker (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show

edit

Hi. I took a look and pages 143 to 149 are used to analyse that specific episode. I don't know how useful it is though, but I could take a look later if you choose to write the stuff from Planet Simpson. --Maitch (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

An analysis would be great. I'll see if I can find anything else, I mean, there's got to be something out there to source a cultural references section. Gran2 06:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have added a "Themes" and a "Cultural References" section as well as I found some ratings information. The article needs to be looked over, so it flows better. So if either of you could do it. I could perhaps do some more work on it later.
The lead needs to be expanded. --Maitch (talk) 15:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
We'll need to listen to the commentary again to make sure I didn't miss anything vital when I first wrote the page (which was over a year ago), and the prose needs improving throughout, but it's a lot better now. On a side note, looks like people are now going after the infobox images [5]. Apparently, illustrating the main plot of an episode isn't "fair use" anymore. The times they are a changing... Gran2 19:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

some editor copy-paseted the content from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/U2 discography to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/U2 discography/archive 1, but aren't they supposed to move the article, since you're an admin could you move the history too. --Gman124 talk 13:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have completed the requests made in your comments. For the list source, I found a very helpful book that had also helped me with the rest of the list earlier. RedThunder 13:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Eric Cartman

edit

You forgot to make the proper subpage for the GA review. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 23:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of players from Puerto Rico in Major League Baseball

edit

Sure, I'm just trying to make my replies noticeable from the reviewer comments, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 21:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re:FLC contest

edit

Thanks. I'm looking forward to the next one :p Maybe make that one collaborative (randomly assign editors to work with one another) or some other format? In any case, it was nice to expand my horizons in article writing thanks to this contest. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Imperial Napoleonic triple crown

edit
 
It gives me great joy to award this Imperial Napoleonic triple crown for exceptional mainspace contributions to articles Simpsons-related and otherwise. Thank you very much for your generous time and diligence on behalf of the project. You are a Napoleon among editors. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your Imperial Napoleonic Majesty, outstanding work! Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply