Image tagging for Image:Odonovan.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Odonovan.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Walker

edit

A tag has been placed on Patrick Walker (football manager), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 15:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Wayne Mullins

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Wayne Mullins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AvruchTalk 00:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Notability of Steve Lyne

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Steve Lyne, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Steve Lyne seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Steve Lyne, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of OFF Rangers FC

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, OFF Rangers FC, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OFF Rangers FC. Thank you. Ref (chew)(do) 20:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

OFF Rangers FC

edit

Hello, Scottyccfc. This isn't a "power trip". It was nominated for deletion by User:Dennisthe2, as it fails to meet notability requirements. See Wikipedia:Notability for more information. The article was about an amateur sports team, therefore, it did "not satisfy notability criteria for football (soccer) in Ireland," according to another Wikipedian at the AfD for this article. Have a great day, and let me know if you have any further questions. Also, always remember to assume good faith, remain civil, and stay cool.

Some more tips: Sign all of your comments with ~~~~, always post at the bottom of a talk page, and created new heading for new conversations, using ==, like ==OFF Rangers FC==. нмŵוτнτ 16:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2008

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Former Cork City FC players, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. -- Blake01 09:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of FIFA Two

edit
 

The article FIFA Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor news story not meeting guidelines for notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HighKing (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


Proposed deletion of FIFA Two

edit
 

The article FIFA Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails notability. A minor news story blown out of proportion by this article. Fails as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NTEMP as it did not have significant ongoing coverage. Also title choice (which is not NPOV and suggests an injustice as per Birmingham Six or Guilford Four) suggests this article was really to call attention to the case. Only search returned from Google is an online petition to support the players.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HighKing (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Scottyccfc! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 222 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Robert Walker (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Kevin Walker (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of FIFA Two for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FIFA Two is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA Two until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply