User talk:Sddarealone
Add topic| This is Sddarealone's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.At most, I will be in prep for my upcoming competitive exams that will wrap up by Feb. Other than a FA, stub-class, and few GAN reviews, my edits will be limited here. Fingers crossed. |
Good article nominations RfC
[edit]Hi Sddarealone,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the invite @JacobTheRox. The proposal list is good and I concur with most of the voting by the participants in each proposal. I added my comments where my views differ. Sddarealone (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you are a user who has a number of open Good Article nominations and thought you might be interested in Good Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return. Check out the project page for more details! — 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 03:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Organized Labour September Editing Event
[edit]
You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!
The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!
This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!
Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Sddarealone. Thank you for your work on Leo Blitz. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NPROF. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 08:10, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Mariamnei. You can safely remove the notability tag as Dr. Blitz was a professor emeritus at UC Berkeley, has been cited in multiple research papers, and was a member of notable organisations such as IAU and AAS. He was also a recipient of Sloan Research Fellowship, and had published in many journals (see here). Sddarealone (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- I was updating the article with many secondary sources I'm reading right now so by today it will easily be an article on a notable academic subject. Sddarealone (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Sddarealone - Thank you for writing to me. I have removed the template on the basis of the Sloan Fellowship. In general, my recommendation is to start writing articles like this in draft space and moving them to main space once it clear that they make notability. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 08:29, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
WP:GARC: Invitation to review Asemonea murphyae
[edit]
Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Asemonea murphyae . At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.
To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#121.