Sean Gallen 88

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leaps by Bayer (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Sean Gallen 88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leaps by Bayer (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leaps by Bayer (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leaps by Bayer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Sean Gallen 88. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Leaps by Bayer, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sean Gallen 88. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sean Gallen 88|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Answer

Apologies for the misunderstanding. I stated clearly in my first interaction the nature of my connection with the subject and the person who responded thanked me for making that clear. I misunderstood that to mean my affiliation was transparent and missed the official tag. I am writing for Leaps by Bayer on behalf of TLGG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean Gallen 88 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for clarifying. I have added the {{connected contributor (paid)}} tag to the talk page of the draft article as well. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Answer

Thank you for your support. Should I resubmit the draft or is it being processed? Thanks again, Seán — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean Gallen 88 (talk • contribs)

The last comment on your draft was from July 30. The reviewer said: "Notable investments" is the prime example of advertisement. Please take a few minutes to read What Wikipedia is NOT. It is likely to be rejected if resubmitted with zero or minor changes. You will need to edit the draft again to address these concerns before resubmitting it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I removed the "Leaps by Bayer" section you posted below because it serves no purpose here. Your paid editing disclosure has already been made on your userpage, and doesn't need to be repeated on your talk page.

I will tell you right away that both the WSJ Partners and Bloomberg sources won't be considered reliable; the WSJ content appears to be paid content produced by your company, and the Bloomberg profiles are generally considered to be based on company press releases. Please understand that we have no interest in what your company wishes to say about itself. We care about what other reliable sources with no vested interest in your company have chosen on their own to publish about it.

Also, please sign your posts on talk pages, so that your signature and the date and time of your comment will be automatically inserted. It is important to identify who said what, and when. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leaps by Bayer

Hello, Sean Gallen 88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leaps by Bayer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)