Seanbrasher
|
Micah Sanders, Technopathy
editYour recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --Madchester 22:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Warning removal
editPlease do not remove warning templates from other editors. If you wish to remove another editor's comment, you should contact them directly before proceeding. (See Help:Talk_page#Etiquette) You are free to archive data on your talk page if becomes too long. --Madchester 02:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Micah Sanders Mediation
editHey there.
I saw your mediation case and decided to add myself as a mediator.
I skimmed over the discussion and it seems that everyone is still acting civilly so I think that I don't need to get involved in the discussion yet.
Based on your comments, I think that a better approach for you would be to create a request for comment. This is basically a standard method many editors use when they wish to gain a greater consensus regarding material in an article. You might also check out WikiProject TV and contact other interested editors there. You might also search other articles about the Heroes show to see how other editors might be handling similar issues. If you can't build consensus through any of those approaches, and the discussions break down, then we can discuss further mediation.
If I don't hear back from you on my talk page or the mediation case page in a week, I'll assume we can safely close the case.
Happy editing.
Fair use rationale for File:D20 Apocalypse Book Cover.jpg
editThanks for uploading or contributing to File:D20 Apocalypse Book Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)