User talk:Septrillion/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Septrillion! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Apology

My apology on that. I undid my edit. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I totally understand! Septrillion (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hi I saw you templated 27.99.54.194 - this is fine but please don't issue a final warning as the second warning, a final warning is the 4th warning for purposed of WP:AIV Seraphim System ^(talk) 06:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Seraphim System ^(talk) 06:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

It actually wasn't removed but I just placed a third warning after it. Seraphim System ^(talk) 06:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Escalating the warning levels too fast can also make it difficult for wp:Huggle users. Huggle would see the level 4 and want to report to AIV. Some Huggle users don't bother with selecting diffs and just report automatically. If there is insufficient warnings, the admin would likely reject the report. The rejection would confuse Huggle further and no further reports would be made. If the editor is really a vandal, they would likely go over the line quickly enough. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Careful use of "vandalism"

Hey, Septrillion. In regards to User talk:ChrisTheWhaleKing#December 2017, I'd just like to clarify that Wikipedia has a very strict definition of vandalism, elaborated on at Wikipedia:Vandalism. Twinkle easily allows the use of various other user warning templates (besides {{uw-vandalism1}}) for edits that may be in good faith, such as {{uw-test1}} (test edits), {{uw-error1}} (introducing deliberate factual errors), and {{uw-unsourced1}} (addition of unsourced or improperly cited material), and all user warning templates are listed at WP:WARN. Assuming good faith is important because labeling new users as vandals who may be able to learn Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to contribute constructively may prevent them from participating in the project. If you come across an edit when patrolling that isn't obvious vandalism (like random cursing or inserting gibberish characters), you may need to do some digging to see if it's a test edit, incorrect, correct but unsourced, etc. Rhinopias (talk) 21:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Bardown Ravioli

Hi I noticed that you warned the user but didn't revert their vandalism. Please remember to do both next time. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 01:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

I intended to, but kept getting into edit conflicts. Septrillion (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Backyardigans— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Wrong edit. Septrillion (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Yes you're a Barnstar Zx24 (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Fighting Vandalism

You are so fast at fighting vandalism! Every time I got to revert some vandalism you are always on click ahead of me! Thank you for your help on fighting vandalism! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

I noticed your comment on Hickory's talk page and have granted you rollback access. Please read Wikipedia:Rollback#When to use rollback carefully and start off slowly. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Thought I had reverted a different edit. Septrillion (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Getoneswhosouldbegot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. People can do what they want with their own talk pages. CLCStudent (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Reverted wrong edit. Septrillion (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC) No. It was not a mistake. People are allowed blank their own talk pages, so please refrain from warring with him when he deletes content. CLCStudent (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC) My mistake. Septrillion (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Sorry, I thought I was reverting the removal of the speedy tag on the page he created. Septrillion (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation (audio) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disambiguation (audio). Since you had some involvement with the Disambiguation (audio) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

About Belle's Tales of Friendship...

Don't you see that I'm TRYING TO REMOVE THE VANDALISM THAT 14.231.177.129 MADE A MONTH AGO!!!! HE JUST TOOK INFORMATION FROM THE 1991 BATB AND BELLE'S MAGICAL WORLD PAGES AND EDITED THEM AND PUT EM ON THE BTOF PAGE!!!

--2601:202:4001:21A0:C8BB:4265:5530:CE76 (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I have realized my mistake and finished the job for you! Septrillion (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! (National Retail Systems)

Multiple people who appear to be affiliated with the company concerned in this page National Retail Systems are removing sections of the article repeatedly. They have a history going back a few years of editing the article to promote the company. It may be a candidate for a lock if they continue to do so, as it constitutes a clear violation of the conflict of interest policy. Thanks for your help in keeping the entry accurate! Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 19:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Finneas

Hi why did you undo what I did?96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Because it is unsourced. Septrillion (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Here is the reference two of them

here is the clip on him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyO635BBySM

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3906552/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

Quote Finneas O'Connell is an American actor and musician who plays Alistaire in the Fox TV series Glee and stars as Shane in the award winning independent feature Life Inside Out. He is also known for his portrayal of the character Spencer (Twilight) in Columbia Pictures' Bad Teacher, has a recurring role on ABC's Modern Family and appears in the premiere episode of "Aquarius".

Finneas began writing songs at the age of 12. He is the front man and lead singer/songwriter of the band, The Slightlys, whose song, "Is There Anybody There" appeared in an episode of ABC Family's Switched At Birth. The band has won numerous awards and competitions in the Los Angeles area. - IMDb Mini Biography By: TBD Public Relations

Thanks:96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

I don't know how to add source's I am still new to this editing stuff.96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Are you still there?96.36.68.29 (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. User:Beeblebrox (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

You just did this again, please stop. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Please explain how User:Bbb23 is worse than Kim Jong Un and User:Oshw^nker request DEMOTION to SPI Cleric could possibly be good faith editors. Septrillion (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Massages were not in reference to those specific names but rather to more run-of-the-mill violations that were not attacks on specific users. For example [1]. In addition to having no edits, I don’t even see how this is a username violation. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I see. Septrillion (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

@Beeblebrox: Other admins had no trouble blocking User:FuckMan91 with no edits. Septrillion (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I suppose that falls with the realm of administrative discretion, I wouldn’t have bothered as it makes no difference whether they are blocked or not. You’ll note my initial message is a template, not just my opinion. I looked at a bunch of your reports, and by and large they are fine and I am not trying to discourage you from reporting, just be a tiny bit more thoughtful about what you are reporting. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your countervandalism, especially reverting AstaDev's mess. Please consider getting formal training at WP:CVUA to improve your ability to clean this place up. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

How to Change Username

Please guide me how can I change username? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techybot (talk • contribs) 05:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Techybot: instructions can be found at WP:CHU Septrillion (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Sir

I understood and already requested name change from Techybot to Techypedian Techybot (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Blank Banshee 0

Your best bet is to walk away and take it to the talk page rather than contributing to the edit war. If need be, you can request a third opinion or file a request for comment. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 14:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

I would also like to thank Septrillion for leaving my edit alone. Thank you Septrillion! Thank you, as well, PCHS-NJROTC, for talking about it! --Macaroniking (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Football records in Spain

Hi, regarding your message as per the above, how is it possible that you didn't see the (reliable) sources I have provided ??? You said "unsourced" while I provided sources from "The Guardian", newspaper "Sport" and FC Barcelona's official site and you tell me that I didn't provide sources ??? This is ridiculous and Wikipedia cannot improve with comments and actions like the ones of yours... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dim. Nor. 86 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

restored changes Septrillion (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 01:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

"Sectarianism"

Hi. Please be aware that in this case the topic was indeed communalism: the Faction viewed the country as a federation of self-regulated communes. This is referenced in the article, and you can use Ctrl+F and "communalism" or such to see the exact context before deciding what is and isn't wrong use, what is and isn't a fix. Regards, Dahn (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Dimple ghosh

Hey,

I didn't realize you nominated this for Speedy Deletion before I did. The editor removed it and I just came across this page while patrolling recent changes. Should I remove my tag? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

No. The removal was unauthorized! Septrillion (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

And the page has now been deleted. It looks like there was a discussion on the 15th about deleting this page so it might need to be salted if it pops up again. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Edits to Decred

You recently reverted edits to the article for Decred that were made to adhere to the policies provided by Wikipedia in the following document:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_self-published_works

The contents provided in the article appear to be self-published from the "Decred" company and appear as advertorial content. As they do not meet the standards of Wikipedia, they should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strongbad899 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

I already undid my revert before you posted. Please check the page again. Septrillion (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

I see now, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strongbad899 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

What is the matter with you?

Do you even check the edits you're reverting, or you just assume all IP users are vandals? Read the edit summary: the template is broken, you can tell by the obvious error message at the bottom of the page. I've been trying to fix that and you reverted my edits. Twice. Maybe it's time to find a new hobby.--93.42.65.170 (talk) 23:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

I clicked the wrong button! Septrillion (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Which page/edit are you referring to? Septrillion (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Paul Nehlen. See User_talk:NeilN#Re:_editing_articles_about_politics/politicians --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

I see. Septrillion (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

What are you doing?

Why did you revert my edits? I just fixed a category and you reverted again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1315:44A2:0:E8AD:EEB2:9AB2 (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Oops! Wrong button again! Septrillion (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Weinstein Effect "Vandalism"

About the recent edits on that page regarding Channel Awesome. Holly Christine Brown was already mentioned in one of the sources listed on that section (the article on Dailydot mentions her being sexually harassed by former Chief operating officer, Mike Ellis) and I thought it would be appropriate to list her as one of the notable victims (because she is). Also the source I added was a source related to the recent allegations regardingJustin Carmical (the source (a tweet) was also written by Holly Brown), as there was no source on the section related to Carmical (it was not in any of the articles already sourced), and this source was also on the Channel Awesome article (on the controversy section) which is where I got the source from. I'm sorry if it looks like I am "vandalizing", but I'm actually trying to add some sources related to these allegations (also I'm sorry if my wording and grammar is off). --73.240.105.138 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Accidentally pressed "Q" instead of "SPACE" when using Huggle. I reverted my revert. Septrillion (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Mark Wright - Wikipedia Page

Hi there,

I have just published content for Mark Wright (entrepreneur), winner of the 2014 Apprentice (UK Series).

You recently removed the page I published for Mark Wright (entrepreneur) (4th April 2018). Your feedback indicated that you thought the page to be "promotional". I have removed any content that I thought you may have seen as promotional, and published the page again. However, you have made another request for speedy deletion.

It would be great if you could let us know how this content is "promotional". We have tried to ensure it is in keeping with other Apprentice winners (see Leah Totton and Susie Ma).

You have also deemed the content is inappropriate. I'm not sure how this can be considering Mark is already mentioned on a Wikipedia page for The Apprentice (Series 10) and his fellow winners also have Wikipedia pages (as mentioned above). Please can you explain why you believe the content to be inappropriate?

My colleague will be making some edits to the page shortly [improving content and formatting], so I'd be grateful if you could refrain from deleting the page for the time being.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

--Helenareid (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Helena Reid

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beraen Hunter, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Septrillion (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Message intended for User:Septrilion. Septrillion (talk) 15:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Perkasie station

I added references and a 1910 photo to Perkasie station and removed the prod. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Notability of railway stations

Multiple references almost always exist for any railway station, even if they are not included in the article, which is why railway stations are usually not deleted at AfD. Please see Wikipedia:RAILOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (Railway lines and stations). When I see an article about a railway station that lacks references, I generally try to find references to add to it. Sometimes an image on an old postcard can serve both as a reference and as a public-domain image to add to the article's infobox. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Perkasie station

Hello Septrillion. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Perkasie station, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G6 doesn't apply to redirects as a result of routine pagemoves, and consensus is to keep draft->mainspace redirects. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I've undone a few more (pinging 331dot and Anthony Appleyard), but please note that WP:CSD#G6 explicitly does not apply to redirects from page moves unless they are unambiguously made in error, and in the case of Draft->Mainspace redirects, the community consensus is against deleting such redirects. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Good to know. Septrillion (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion tag removed: Sakae Esuno

Hello, just a courtesy note to say I've removed the CSD A1 tag you added to the new article on Sakae Esuno. The criterion is not met here because there is definitely enough context to identify the subject and any potential notability. You may confirm this with a quick Google search. Whether other criteria apply is not under dispute. Normally, I prefer to WP:AGF and give these article creators a bit more time before putting their contributions to the axe. That way we don't put off new editors who genuinely wish to contribute positively. Regards,Nick Moyes (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained reversions

What is the rationale for the unexplained reversions at Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 22:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Accidental reversions. Septrillion (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Multiple times? After you were expressly asked for a rationale more than once? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 23:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Pressed "Q" instead of space. It is restored now. Septrillion (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

You have done this several more times now. What's with that? 142.161.81.20 (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

My cat walked over my keyboard, causing the "Q" key to be pressed in the process! I sincerely apologize for my accidental reversions and will try to keep the cat away in the future! :) Septrillion (talk) 03:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

You just did it again at Ernst von Dobschütz. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

I have self reverted again. Might I suggest an account? Septrillion (talk) 04:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

(edit conflict) How would getting an account solve the problem of your cat repeatedly reverting contributions to the encyclopedia over the course of multiple days? That would just mean your cat would be reverting someone else's contributions, perhaps someone less likely to notice than I am. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 04:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

I have also archived the warnings because they were causing Huggle to get confused. Septrillion (talk) 04:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion declined: User:MakesTheWikiBetter

Just a note that the user in question did not put enough information that falls outside of the rules, therefore it is not a case for CSD:U5.-- Alexf^(talk) 00:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Climate Change

Is climate change real? I mean people say global warming, but its -34 degrees here in Canada right now! Coolkid526 (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

YES ITS VERY REAL!!!!!! :) 00:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Tagging of Perkasie station

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Perkasie station. I do not think that Perkasie station fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because A train station is a physical location, and so is not in scope for A7. I request that you consider not re-tagging Perkasie station for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I never planned on replacing a declined speedy. Septrillion (talk) 01:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I am glad to hear it -- the above is standard language, because i never know who might consider doing so. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

That's a template? Septrillion (talk) 01:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, {{Speedy-Warn}}. I use it fairly often when i decline speed deletion tags. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I think the larger issue is that you moved a Draft to Namespace just to speedy delete it. It's not what Drafts are for, and moving something to a different namespace just to get around the speedy deletion criteria is inappropriate. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Oh Dear, i had missed that. That is not acceptable. Please do not do it again. If none of the criteria which apply in draft space fits (mostly the G criteria) then the draft should not be speedy deleted. It is fine for people to start incomplete, unsourced drafts, with the intent of improving them until they are ready for the main article space. To tag theses for speedy deletion is to violate WP:BITE and to "promote" them to mainspace so that the A-criteria seem to apply is to game the system. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

@DESiegel and Amorymeltzer: The page had initially been created in mainspace but had been draftified by another editor. Had the article been speediable under WP:CSD#A7, would that not be gaming the system in the other direction? Septrillion (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

See this diff. Septrillion (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

No it would not be gaming the system, nor does it make the later move acceptable. It is common to move an article that is not ready for mainspace, but that might become a valid article with additional work, to draft space or user space to allow that work to proceed. I have done this myself many times. Look at my move log if you like. But once such a move has been made, the page is then a draft, no matter how it started. It may be moved to mainspace (or back to main space) by any confirmed editor who believes in good faith that it is ready for mainspace. It may not be moved with the intent of making it eligible for an A-series speedy deletion, or for AfD. If you really think it must be deleted, take it to MfD, but recall that as per WP:NMFD lack of notability is not relevant there, nor is lack of sources cited. I suppose your actions were undertaken in good faith, but please do not make such a move again. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 19:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism on scopes trial page

Before you revert, do you actually examine the changes? Because I removed vandalism that referred to John Scopes as a "Dookie butt", and don't understand why you would consider that worthy of reverting. Someone else has rectified the vandalism, but that was uncalled for. Pdinc (talk) 02:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

I misread the diff. I thought that vandalism was being inserted, not removed. I think I'll call it quits for tonight and resume patrolling when I'm more alert/attentive. Septrillion (talk) 02:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Vandal warned. Reverter de-warned and welcomed. Septrillion (talk) 02:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Septrillion. You have new messages at Mdriscoll03's talk page.
Message added 23:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Absolutely, I will do next time. Once I recognized my mistake someone else actually requested the page for speedy deletion. Thank you for bringing this to my attention though, greatly appreciated. Mdriscoll03 (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Septrillion (talk) 23:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Rollback revoked

I've revoked your ability to use rollback after this revert and subsequent automated report to AIV. Looking through your talk page, you've received a lot of complaints about this, and your answer seems to always be that it was a mistake. While I accept that everyone makes mistakes, you are responsible for all of your semi-automated edits, and the error rate here is too high. Pinging Mz7 as a courtesy since he granted the flag. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

It appears that my mistake was multi-tasking while using Huggle. I'm sure the error rate would have been much lower had I not done that. I will not make that mistake again, should I ever regain the flag. Septrillion (talk) 01:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Pinging NeilN as the actual granter of the flag. Septrillion (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for that. I saw Mz7 as the last log entry and misread it, that was for pending changes. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Welcome and congratulations from WP:STiki!

Hello, Septrillion, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Septrillion! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

why did you revert my constructive edit?

I made a good edit my very first edit. and I was happy. then a message popped up-septrillion reverted your edit. bUT IT WAS A GOOD EDIT. so please, tell me why.

Explained at User talk:Fredthefishlord. Septrillion (talk) 01:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you so much your your help very much appreciated. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 02:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 02:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

User talk:~S.Brendan.S~

I would strongly suggest WP:DENY here. You're not helping. If the user is telling the truth, then all that can be said has already been said; if the user is trolling, then we are giving them exactly what they want by responding to them. Mz7 (talk) 07:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Wrong editor

Too long. Please start a new thread. Septrillion (talk)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I did not re-create the page. But I think I know the real name of the person who re-created the page. I can't say. That could be outing. I do not want to get indeffed. QuackGuru (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC) I know you didn't recreate the page, but you were among one of the greatest contributors to it. Therefore I felt it was more appropriate to notify you instead of the indeffed account who created the page but contributed very little. I think the best advice I can give you on WP:OUTING is to use common sense. Septrillion (talk) 02:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC) The article has since changed since the obvious COI editing. I can't say who it was. I didn't know until today. QuackGuru (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Are you going to !vote at the AfD? Septrillion (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC) There are over 50 independent sources. I am still trying to understand the reason you nominated it for deletion. Are you going to not restore this? That was not a minor edit. QuackGuru (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC) I still would like a more specific reason for the AFD for Everipedia. The article I did create was Tedd Koren. It appears that article is not notable. How come you did not nominate that for deletion? QuackGuru (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC) I am considering withdrawing my nomination of Everipedia. I have WP:PRODed Tedd Koren. I am not going to restore the {{ow}} template on your talk page as you have removed it. While you are allowed to do this per WP:OWNTALK, archiving is preferred. The removed discussions remain publicly accessible via the page history, whether you like it or not. Septrillion (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Please AFD Tedd Koren for more views. I would like to hear what others think. I am neutral at the moment. QuackGuru (talk) 18:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Done. Septrillion (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Never mind the socks. It is far more complicated. There are COI editors and others. I also have not figured out how to get past those we don't speak of. Those we don't speak of also want me bonked. QuackGuru (talk) 00:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC) What for? Septrillion (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC) There are too many of them doing different things to different articles. Those we don't speak of want to take care of me for sport. QuackGuru (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC) Why are they out to get you? Septrillion (talk) 01:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC) I know one of them enjoys it. The other one didn't like it after I deleted a comment they made. Then there is another one who noticed this and thinks I must be the problem. QuackGuru (talk) 01:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC) Can you be more specific, which block are you protesting? There are so many! Septrillion (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2018 (UTC) It is better to avoid going into detail. There is too many things to explain for anyone to understand. You can read a little about the topic. QuackGuru (talk) 01:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC) All evidence appears to be valid. What am I missing? Septrillion (talk) 01:51, 28 April 2018 (UTC) If all evidence appears to be valid then how come no action was taken based on the evidence I submitted? QuackGuru (talk) 04:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC) Because you're a "bad editor"! Only cabal-approved "good editors" can submit evidence and expect to have anything done. Septrillion (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC) You claim the evidence I submitted was ignored because I'm a "bad editor"? No admin should ignore evidence because of who submitted it. If the evidence was ignoring then something is wrong with system. People have been complaining on the talk page of different articles that the page is outdated. I am the only editor who was updating all the articles. Since 2016 none of the main articles have been updated. A few of the subpages I have managed to update in mainspace. I think you may understand my interest in editing the Everipedia page. QuackGuru (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2018 (UTC) You're right! I can't see any other reason why the evidence would be rejected? Septrillion (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC) E-mailing a CheckUser is not the answer. Things are not what you think they are. They way to fix it is from the outside. QuackGuru (talk) 02:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC) You could email me. I have some very creative methods for dealing with socks! Septrillion (talk) 02:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC) I have a better idea. QuackGuru (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Your "better idea" has already been rejected by the Wikipedia community. If you want the "reforms" you suggested you can start your own wiki or join an existing one. If you want the socks taken care of, that can be done if you email me the info. I have a few anti-sock tricks up my sleeve, which can only be discussed via email. Septrillion (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC) The "better idea" will be done from the outside in. After it is implemented admins will go bang bang bang at anything that moves in the topic area. I know how things are done around here. The "better idea" is a new idea. QuackGuru (talk) 03:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC) For the last time, there is a strong consensus against the implementation of your idea. The Wikipedia community believes that it runs counter to the purpose of Wikipedia itself! I think it's time to drop that idea and come up with something else. Understood? Septrillion (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC) I already came up with a new idea. I am the only one that knows that idea. QuackGuru (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC) What's your "new idea"? How is it different from the old one? Septrillion (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC) The socks are listening. QuackGuru (talk) 18:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Email me. Septrillion (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Bad idea. My e-mail was blocked before. Admins are also listening. They will read it. This place is bugged. QuackGuru (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Not true. Emails sent using Wikimedia's mail facility are private. Their contents cannot be read by administrators or anyone else, even to check for appropriateness, so only limited help is possible if the feature is being abused. It is possible for users able to access the CheckUser tool to confirm if and when a user sent any emails, but not the content of the emails. In the event of abuse, threats, or harassment through this facility, users may contact any administrator for advice and assistance (by email or any other way, if they wish, in order to keep it private). In more serious cases they should email the Volunteer Response Team for help. Septrillion (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC) When clicking to edit an article it says, Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Not true. Editors replace well written content with failed verification content. After failed verification content is discussed on the talk page they argue it is still sourced. QuackGuru (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Irrelevant to the issue of email. If you want to discuss another topic, please start a new thread. Septrillion (talk) 00:43, 1 May 2018 (UTC) It is related. The WMF did not keep their promise when they stated Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. across numerous articles. They did not enforce that. QuackGuru (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The edit notice is a message to editors reminding them that the content that they submit should be verifiable. The Wikimedia Foundation makes no promise. See their disclaimer. You have given no evidence that they are violating their promise about email. If you're that paranoid, why don't you send me an empty email, so I can see your email address for off-wiki contact? Septrillion (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The edit notice states the content must be verifiable. They must honor that notice or change it. Their disclaimer contradicts the edit notice. I have my own ways for dealing with socks. QuackGuru (talk) 10:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The edit notice wasn't created by the WMF it was created by Ironholds back in 2012 Septrillion (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC) The WMF did not disagree with these notices across Wikipedia. The edit notice still contradicts the WMF's edit notice. QuackGuru (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC) There is no contradiction. No promises whatsoever are made in the edit notice. Septrillion (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Rochester Kings

I have contested it. But it won't do any good. WAY too many guidelines. NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Try reading Wikipedia:Your first article. Septrillion (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rich Mountain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

False positive. Previous link was already a redirect. Septrillion (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

ok thanks sorry

ok thank you i'm really sorry about that still kinda new to wiki.i'm a christian conservative vaporwave loving human being and if you are triggered then i'm sorry lol not. 00:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaporwaveman34 (talk • contribs)

It's ok. I'm not triggered. I'm just stating the policy. Septrillion (talk) 01:03, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
4		Dominique Roman (talk)	Add sources
138		Shannon Beveridge (talk)	Add sources
248		Deliberative democracy (talk)	Add sources
23		ANT1 Group (talk)	Add sources
720		Chișinău (talk)	Add sources
468		Public broadcasting (talk)	Add sources
68		Inclusive Democracy (talk)	Cleanup
10		Federation of Green Parties of Africa (talk)	Cleanup
92		Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property (talk)	Cleanup
376		Zone to Defend (talk)	Expand
20		Media of Romania (talk)	Expand
76		Afrin Region (talk)	Expand
72		Dual power (Russian Revolution) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
96		Ultra-leftism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,348		Sacco and Vanzetti (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
254		Rojava conflict (talk)	Merge
133		Appropriation bill (talk)	Merge
130		Syrian Kurdish–Islamist conflict (2013–present) (talk)	Merge
105		Criticism of libertarianism (talk)	Wikify
75		Anarchism in Russia (talk)	Wikify
84		Market fundamentalism (talk)	Wikify
6		ULMA Architectural Solutions (talk)	Orphan
4		Agroterra (talk)	Orphan
3		People's Council of West Kurdistan (talk)	Orphan
9		BBC Romanian (talk)	Stub
277		SNAC (talk)	Stub
51		Financial Revolution (talk)	Stub
33		Kurdish Supreme Committee (talk)	Stub
5		Bahar, Iran (talk)	Stub
50		Makhnovism (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse

Thanks! for answering my question. Kpgjhpjm (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Septrillion (talk) 16:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Question

I have left a question on the teahouse in 'draft' , please anwser it.Kpgjhpjm (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Sure. But please be patient. Septrillion (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

DarkSpartan (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you! Septrillion (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I think you're a good person.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding the SB Real Madrid stadium update.

Hi, just wanted to let you know there were some glaring inconsistencies in that page.

1. There was a lot of information without citation and and I added a few citation needed where I felt it would be necessary.

1. There were some inconsistencies in the links , meaning the article linked did not contain any of the information mentioned in the paragraph it was linked too.

1. In many instances, the article did not seem to convey facts, but rather hopes and aspirations, while wikipedia clearly states facts only.

You seem like a veteran, and I concede I am fairly new (heck i'm not even sure how to use the numbered list item in the page script, but I try). I suspect the article has been highjacked and crafted to provide a favourable representation to the team associated rather than the stadia, which is the main focus of the article itself.

Thanks for the headsup regarding details in full I will keep that in mind.

Have a nice day. Regards.

M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkf89 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I have a new signature!

10^Eleventeen 16:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi

I have accepted your adoption offer so what now☣LearnLurker☣|☣Chat☣ 22:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Answered here. 10^Eleventeen 22:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

So what can I/We do now that I am adopted☣LearnLurker☣|☣Chat☣ 22:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Is there anything you'd like me to help you with? 10^Eleventeen 22:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Well not help yet I would say tutor me since I have know on the basics I would like to know direct from you on how to apply references, footnotes, notes, sources, and how to know if a source is reliable. ☣LearnLurker☣|☣Chat☣ 22:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

See WP:CITE and WP:RS. Ask me if you have any specific questions. 10^Eleventeen 23:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Please...

Do NOT edit my talk page. I was aware of the barnstar and left it even though the user was a vandal. Please, please, please only use my talk page for questions. Best regards, TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 00:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok. I just thought it would be best to deny recognition. 10^Eleventeen 00:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adopting me!!! TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Stub

I just made a huge edit to Middle Creek (Opequon Creek tributary), and was wondering if it would still be considered a "Stub". Best Regards, TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 15:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Not a stub anymore, but I'd add a few references to the content you just added. 10^Eleventeen 16:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Adoption Offer

Will you please explain what exactly adopting is? It sounds intriguing, but I do not know what it is. Best regards, TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 01:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

See WP:ADOPT. 10^Eleventeen 01:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

After thinking it over, I will accept the adoption offer, and look forward to being guided on the ways of Wikipedia! TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 01:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Is there anything you'd like help with? 10^Eleventeen 01:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

I just discovered Twinkle in the past couple of days, and I would like to know how to properly use it. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 01:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

See WP:TWINKLE for instructions. Do you have any specific questions? 10^Eleventeen 01:44, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Of course Septrillion, I would gladly accept your offer. I'm still looking to improve my wikipedia skills. Lightningboltz03 (talk) 12:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Lightningboltz03 5/12/18

@Lightningboltz03: You have already accepted! :) 10^Eleventeen 16:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

How to do prevent an article from being deleted

How to do prevent an article from being deleted What does it require to make a great article that will blow the roof off wikipedia☣LearnLurker☣|☣Chat☣ 14:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC) One signature, please! 10^Eleventeen 16:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

See WP:DUDE and WP:FA respectively. 10^Eleventeen 16:18, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

How is your day

How is your day

Here is a joke what is smarter than a talking dog☣LearnLurker☣|☣Chat☣ 18:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, but no thanks. 10^Eleventeen 18:35, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Armisenia

This is the official website of Armisenia https://armisenia.blogspot.com/

Wow! Short! 10^Eleventeen 01:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

PROD tag

Sorry about the Proposed deletion! I thought I was creating a maintenance tag. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 01:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

It's ok. If you still think the page should be deleted, take it to AfD. 10^Eleventeen 01:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Signature

How do I customize my signature? The Wikipedia article was a bit confusing... TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

What, specifically, do you need help with? What part of the article was confusing? 10^Eleventeen 02:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Adoption offer

Yes adopt me be my mentor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcisawesomeguy (talk • contribs) 03:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok. 10^Eleventeen 03:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Armisenia page

Can you create a wiki for Armisenia and their president John Clarence Gomez. Armisenia is a micronation located in Navotas, Philippines founded by wikipedian user John Clarence Gomez.

John Clarence Gomez (born 2002) is a Filipino micronational leader and conspiracy theories he was a user of Wikipedia since 2016. he founded Armisenia a micronation in 2015.

File:Armisenian Flag.png

Armisenian Flag

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcisawesomeguy (talk • contribs) 01:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

If you can provide any evidence of notability, I will gladly write the article for you. 10^Eleventeen 02:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Jcisawesomeguy: Also, you copied the Viet Cong flag.

Viet Cong Flag

10^Eleventeen 05:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Firebird75 - Name of page

Hi I hope you're well.

the page i'm referring to is Steve Hughes (Radio Presenter) in Firebird75/sandbox. The individual is a radio presenter, actor and writer as well as an entrepreneur, etc. Does this comply with Wiki's criteria? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firebird75 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

I have moved your page to draft space. When you're ready, click "Submit your draft for review!" 10^Eleventeen 15:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Adoption

Thank you for the adoption offer, Septrillion, which I gratefully accept. Thanks also for the useful links to wiki pages - there are a few I hadn't found so I'll check them out and let you know if (or more likely, when!) I have any questions. Many thanks --EOu-ajb (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

No problem. 10^Eleventeen 15:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Adopt

who adopted whom? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I've adopted you. Do you have any questions? 10^Eleventeen 02:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

What is your task?can i ask you questions? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 03:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Any question you'd like! 10^Eleventeen 16:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

how would you help me? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 12:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

How to make my own userbox? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse

Hello Septrillion,

Please do not advise a new editor to submit a highly promotional and completely unreferenced draft to AFC. The draft in question is Draft:Inspire Group, and it is nowhere near ready for review. I appreciate your attempt to help out at the Teahouse, but an overly simple answer often creates more problems. Please take the time to look a little bit deeper. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

ok 10^Eleventeen 23:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Eleventeen zeroes for you!

00000000000 -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 23:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kewlgrapes: Thank you! 10^Eleventeen 22:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Just saw your new signature. Love it! --kewlgrapes (talk/contribs) 03:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! 10^Eleventeen 04:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

G13

In the userspace, G13 only applies to any rejected or unsubmitted Articles for creation pages with the {{AFC submission}} template present. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning it up! 10^Eleventeen 17:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

ZenCash

Do you mind explaining your reasoning for this? Thanks, JustBerry (talk) 01:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Sure. Shortly after translating and moving this article to mainspace, I stumbled across this discussion. I added the template temporarily because I had yet to complete a source check. 10^Eleventeen 01:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Sounds good! Thanks for keeping an eye out for that. --JustBerry (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello Septrillion,

You have been active here for six months and I have been active here for nine years. The community had chosen me to be an administrator and you have not yet achieved that status. Perhaps you don't want it.

When I read your talk page, I see many messages from far more experienced editors than you, pointing out errors or advising you to be more careful. And still, your problematic editing continues. I advise you to take a lengthy break from editing in any areas that can be considered even remotely contentious. Instead, I recommend that you focus on improving non-controversial articles about clearly notable topics. This is, after all, a project to improve an encyclopedia, rather than a venue to get into various battles. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Taking a full WikiBreak. 10^Eleventeen 06:22, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

A good opportunity to relax and recharge. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Hopefully things will be back to normal when I return! Thank you and happy editing! 10^Eleventeen 06:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Now officially on break, goodbye. 10^Eleventeen 06:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

break

I hope you enjoy your break! I think that taking breaks freshens the mind and body. Best regards, TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! 10^Eleventeen 02:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, enjoy your break, when you return please notify me.Regards, Kpgjhpjm (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
130		Peercoin (talk)	Add sources
137		Namiseom (talk)	Add sources
212		Bitcoin Gold (talk)	Add sources
25		Republic of Jamtland (talk)	Add sources
563		Steemit (talk)	Add sources
2,374		Iroquois (talk)	Add sources
157		Proof-of-authority (talk)	Cleanup
738		Proof-of-work system (talk)	Cleanup
15		Legality of psychoactive cactus by country (talk)	Cleanup
573		Asgardia (nation) (talk)	Expand
1,270		Legality of bitcoin by country or territory (talk)	Expand
211		Agriculture in Brazil (talk)	Expand
1,053		Bitcoin Cash (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
150		Zerocoin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
69		Jotter (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
409		Khamoshiyan (talk)	Merge
308		Aksar (talk)	Merge
540		The Sydney Morning Herald (talk)	Merge
55		Syscoin (talk)	Wikify
369		Authenticated encryption (talk)	Wikify
12		Volkswagen Foundation (talk)	Wikify
46		Amit K. Bhardwaj (talk)	Orphan
20		Simon Oxley (talk)	Orphan
44		Æternity (talk)	Orphan
28		Principality of Trinidad (talk)	Stub
39		Feathercoin (talk)	Stub
23		Grand Duchy of the Lagoan Isles (talk)	Stub
20		Kingdom of Wallachia (talk)	Stub
93		Filecoin (talk)	Stub
30		Sovereign State of Aeterna Lucina (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Finally

I am now on break for real! 10^Eleventeen 02:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

We hope to see you when you come off of your wiki-break! Have fun!TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Cake

Hi , enjoy your break

Kpgjhpjm (talk) has given you a WikiCake! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of cakes by adding {{subst:GiveCake}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

After you return we (I ', TheRealWeatherMan and you will share the cake . Kpgjhpjm (talk) 08:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! 10^Eleventeen 13:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

• From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline

• Op-ed: Has the wind gone out of the AdminShip's sails?

• Opinion: Integrating my many lives on Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals

• Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals

• Featured content: Featured content selected by the community

• Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics

• News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia

• In the media: Wikipedia in Turkish politics; COI politics in Wikipedia; most cited work

• Traffic report: We love our superheroes

• Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies

• Blog: Why I write about women on Wikipedia

• Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues

• Humour: Play with your food

• Gallery: Wine not?

• From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   23:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

@The Transhumanist: no prob. 10^Eleventeen 23:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

You clicked the wrong button

Pointless conversation. Editor is now blocked as a sock. 10Eleventeen 01:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I'm not that dude, I'm the other dude. Edward Mordake (talk) 06:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Nope. That was an attack! 10Eleventeen 06:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC) I don't even know how to respond to that. Please do not use those templates again; you clearly don't understand when to use them. Edward Mordake (talk) 06:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Yes I do. 10Eleventeen 06:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Nope, you do not. I know what you are doing. I already made the mistake of giving someone the benefit of the doubt once today, I won't do it again. Edward Mordake (talk) 06:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Do! I've been on here WAY longer than you! 10Eleventeen 06:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC) You should say Doh! again, like Homer. Again you used an incorrect template. I went to ANI and received an apology. From now on, you are officially disinvited from my talkpage. Have a nice day! Edward Mordake (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC) p.s. You need to stop using templates that start with "uw", because you are unable to use them correctly. That did not happen! There is no need to lie! 10Eleventeen 03:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Then why do you? *confused stare* Edward Mordake (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC) And... hatted! 10Eleventeen 03:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikibreak

So , have you thought a date when you will return . If so , please tell me . Kpgjhpjm (talk) 12:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I have shortened my wikibreak. It will now end at the end of this month. It has also been downgraded to a semi-wikibreak, which means I will fix minor errors when I see them. 10^Eleventeen 12:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Is your break over ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 11:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes! 10^Eleventeen 18:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

A dove for you !

Kpgjhpjm (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Kpgjhpjm (talk) 07:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
104		Telugu Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
24		Crimean Tatar Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
307		Bitcoin Core (talk)	Add sources
22		Occitan Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
23		Slovak Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
95		Sanskrit Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
16		High Throughput File System (talk)	Cleanup
190		Clustered file system (talk)	Cleanup
70		YAFFS (talk)	Cleanup
23		Belarusian Wikipedia (talk)	Expand
37		Malay Wikipedia (talk)	Expand
24		Mongolian Wikipedia (talk)	Expand
16,065		Blockchain (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Intercity bus driver (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
106		Multi-stop truck (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
53		Express bus service (talk)	Merge
802		Graph database (talk)	Merge
281		Public transport bus service (talk)	Merge
16		Twelve-wheel drive (talk)	Wikify
12		Soup (Apple) (talk)	Wikify
42		MINIX file system (talk)	Wikify
7		LuxCore (talk)	Orphan
16		Nuco (talk)	Orphan
15		Accione (talk)	Orphan
18		Extremaduran Wikipedia (talk)	Stub
24		Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia (talk)	Stub
48		RootStock (talk)	Stub
28		Irish Wikipedia (talk)	Stub
22		Zulu Wikipedia (talk)	Stub
22		Bosnian Wikipedia (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Question ???

Hi , 10 Eleventeen I have a question . I want to change my colour of my signature to sky blue ? Can you help? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: Any thoughts ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

@Kpgjhpjm: Go to Preferences scroll down to the "signature" section check "Treat the above as wiki markup" and paste the following code into the box:

[[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: #77B5FE">Kpgjhpjm</span>]] ([[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: #77B5FE;">talk</span>]]).

~~~~10^Eleventeen 02:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: you might want to read the next category as well. Thanks! Kpgjhpjm (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Signature

Thanks !! Kpgjhpjm (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

No prob. ~~~~10^Eleventeen 14:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: Why don't you use ping ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Didn't feel like it. ~~~~10^Eleventeen 15:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Note

I thought you should let you know that one of your adoptees TheRealWeatherMan has declared that he is semi-retired .

Also can you answer my question in the section 'Question ??? ' ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Semi not full retired. Remains adopted for now. ~~~~10^Eleventeen 02:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for semi retiring. Life has just gotten too hectic to be on Wikipedia all the time. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@TheRealWeatherMan: Not a problem. Editors have the right to leave or reduce activity at any time. ~~~~10^Eleventeen 19:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Kingdom of North Sudan

Hi, Septrillion. With this edit at List of micronations you removed sourced content without a valid explanation. In your edit summary you wrote WP:WTAF as a reason -- however, WTAF is merely an essay, neither a guideline nor policy, and it is also deals with redlinks. It does not apply and should not be used for blanket removals of sourced information. If you desire the removal of the text, then you will need to open a new discussion and achieve consensus. Regards. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 21:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@CactusWriter: my concern, which I should have made clear in the edit summary, was that the link was a redirect to the list itself and therefore would have been of no use. Now that the redirect has been retargeted, this concern has been resolved. ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 00:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Apparently not the case. ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 00:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Now retargeted to Micronation. ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 00:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I understand your intention now. However, a circular redirect can be resolved simply by unlinking the term without any removal nor retargeting the redirect page. And, as I mentioned in my edit summary, there is a discussion at Talk:Bir Tawil about this. The conclusion of that was to merge the relevant text to List of Micronations and then to redirect "Kingdom of North Sudan" to the list. The term Kingdom of North Sudan no longer appears at Bir Tawil so there is no good reason to redirect the page there anymore. I have reverted your retargeting and restored the redirect according to the consensus. If any of this is unclear, please let me know. Thanks. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@CactusWriter: I would de-link it in the list as well so it is not circular. ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 00:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I've unlinked and anchored it so the redirect finds it target. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 00:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikibreak (Kpgjhpjm)

I am on a wikibreak for today only , My break starts at 5 am (UTC) . If you need me , please leave a message on my talk page . Regards , Kpgjhpjm (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 01:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: Changed your signature , again ?

yes ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 14:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

I am BACK !!

Hi Septrillion , I am back from my wikibreak Kpgjhpjm (talk) 08:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

ok ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 15:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Brand new signature!

Check it out! ~~~~10^Eleventeen 16:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: I like it ! Kpgjhpjm (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! ~~~~10^Eleventeen 02:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: When we are talking about signatures . CAN you answer my question in the category Question ??? ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 02:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

I have! :) ~~~~10^Eleventeen 02:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

The obfuscating signature you're using now is not particularly compliant with WP:SIG guideline/policy page, could you kindly alter it so 'Septrillion' is clearly legible when you're signing your username. Thanks. Nick (talk) 20:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please link the relevant section. ~~~~10^Eleventeen (this is Septrillion) 20:17, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

You'll want Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing_how_everyone_sees_your_signature and particularly these three statements

• A customised signature should make it easy to identify the username, to visit the user's talk-page, and preferably user page.
• A distracting, confusing, or otherwise unsuitable signature may adversely affect other users. For example, some editors find that long formatting disrupts discourse on talk pages, or makes working in the edit window more difficult.
• Complicated signatures contain a lot of code ("markup") that is revealed in the edit window, and can take up unnecessary amounts of narrative space, which can make both reading and editing harder.

Thanks for your co-operation in this matter. Nick (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This has been resolved. ~~‭~~10^{Eleventeen 53PTR1||10N} 20:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick: What do you think? ~~‭~~10^{Eleventeen (SePtRiLlIoN)} 20:36, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

On third thought, this is better. ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 20:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Much better, be nice if you could cut down on some code to achieve the same effect, but a vast improvement nonetheless. Nick (talk) 20:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do! ~~‭~~Septrillion10^Eleventeen 20:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

What happened to your signature ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 01:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

It is better now. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 09:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Reply

Why do you always use ok as a reply ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 06:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 08:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: Again ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes. Again! \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 19:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

An OK for you

I spent half an hour searching for your favourite reply :) Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

error \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 04:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

What error ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 04:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

\\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you say in words ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes.[2] \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

What can be done ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Reboot system. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Who will reboot ? You or I ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

kernel panic \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 05:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I am leaving the discussion because I getting confused by your kernel . Will come back soon , Kpgjhpjm (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

@Septrillion: Fixed your kernel ? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Ya \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 16:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Helpme

Hey, I just spotted your response to this newbie - don't bite the newcomers please. If you want to help out with the {{helpme}} requests, please at least put a bit of effort into it. stwalkerster (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)