User talk:Sesshomaru/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18 >

I hope so.

Because I am NOT about to be blocked for vandalism any day soon. Elm-39 - T/C 19:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Request

Can you do a category cleanup on Shade (comics)? You really don't have to reply on my talk page, I'd prefer it if you would just leave a comment on the article's discussion page concerning your edit. Regards, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I started to remove "teleport", due to magic use, but honestly, it's more due to "darkness manipulation" which has been listified.

So on one hand it should be removed but on the other it should be kept.

Probably not worth the debate : )

Probably be better off dealing with the "fictional characters by in-universe characteristic" categories en-masse.

See if a consensus can be determined at the comics WikiProject? Almost all of the cats are mostly populated by comics-related characters.

I hope this helps. - jc37 23:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Blackfire disambig

Ok, How about this alternative for the Blackfire (disambiguation) page? "Blackfire (magazine), an erotic magazine for black gay men published by the BLK organization." Homeboy (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

My bad: I referred you to the wrong article. Correctly: "Blackfire (magazine), an erotic magazine for black gay men published by the BLK organization." Homeboy (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for the help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Homeboy (talk • contribs) 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Vegeta

I did give reason for the removal. Look on the discussion page where the Vegeta and Bulma married section is. I would retype it but I'm kinda lazy right now. see ya. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.87.6.102 (talk) 07:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Vampire State

Sorry for not adding a source, but its the upcoming 6 issue storyline in Captain Britain and MI: 13. --- Paulley (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Kinniku

Oh - for a moment I thought someone already did that - I just went ahead and did it. :) WhisperToMe (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know

I've created the articles on the new game Saiyan Invasion and the soundtrack for Evolution you may want to keep tabs on. Also, In case you haven't been watching, I updated Yo! Son Goku and His Friends Return!! with information it desperately needed. Sarujo (talk) 01:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I actually did put Saiyan Invasion and its redirect on my watchlist earlier today. I can take care of those for a while. Considering that I have more than 3,090 links watchlisted, I'll do my best to remember looking at the other ones every now and then. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

As you may have already seen the changes to the already changed Final Bout article. More spesifically, the playable characters I really want the the section all DB gamming article to flow as such without the use of list. Any thoughts? Sarujo (talk) 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

You're sure listing isn't a good idea? I don't know how it would be better off any other way. Have you noticed that Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi (series) doesn't even reference the playable characters? A list is prolly the best way of going at it. Either that or nothing at all. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

As I recall some time ago that editors were removing character list from gamming article citing that it was game guide content. The paragraphing was my way of compromising. Chrono Trigger, an RPG, features its character information as a sub-section in paragraph form with a main link to the character list page. If we remove the section all together we get all kinds anonymous IP's coming in and re-adding it in even worse shape. My personal reasoning was the Infinite World article and the shape it's in. People adding every character's transformations and listing GT incarnations as separate charaters when more than likely there just alternate skins the likes of Budokai 3.

As for that series article, it was my impression that all the characters in that column were playable (Shoulder shrug). Sarujo (talk) 22:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Consensus Discussion over Jim Steranko photo

Hi. Could you offer your opinion on the consensus discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Lee Hasdell and User:ClaudioProductions, latest round

You may wish to comment. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Batman (film)

I fail to see the point in adding this to Batman (disambiguation). If people land on Batman (disambiguation) while looking for either of the Batman films, surely they will find it right there, won't they? There seems to me to be no navigational advantage to pointing people to another page that repeats information already found on the page they are reading. Rhindle The Red (talk) 06:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Request

Since you have the administrative features, can you move Jamie Fox (New Jersey) to Jamie Fox? You may leave the hatnoting to me if you wish. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Move done. Hatnote away : ) - jc37 09:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Ball

Hi there! Since you seem to be a Dragon Ball fan, do you know where I might find this: Dragon Ball Z - 'The History of Trunks' Soundtrack Thank you in advance! Also, since you recently warned User:RedRose333, you might be interested in this discussion at AN/I. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 05:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

problematic user

Hi, I see from User:Jienum's talk page that you had some problems with them in the past that I am now experiencing on Gaston (Beauty and the Beast) and I was wondering how you got them to stop adding nonsourced, irrelevant, non-NPOV material to articles. Thanks, Hazelorb (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've replied on my talk page. Let me know if you want to move the discussion here otherwise let's keep it there. I'm watching this page so you can reply here or there. Hazelorb (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

-download | sign! 01:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Why thank you ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Mitsube's issue...

Please kindly check User_talk:Mitsube#Very_bad_editing_style.... Thanks. NazarK (talk) 09:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Oob

Just for the record, and I'm sure you should know this better than anyone, most of the Dragon Ball characters don't have a definite romanization to their names. Most of the time, Japanese publishers can't decide whether it's Kulilin vs. Krilyn, or Freeza vs. Frieza, or even Gokou vs. Goku. Although, Oob is what is used in the Super Battle Collection figure. I'm not sure if that's the ONLY romanization used in Japan, but Majin Boo is used more commonly there than Buu, which makes sense they used Oob over Ubu or Uub. Just wanted to let you know. :p Jonny2x4 (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Madara

Both Madara Rider and Madara Peak are both regularly called just "Madara", so I don't know where you are getting your information. I can see your point about the fictional character, though I disagree with the "incorrect" example they give. On the others, though, you are incorrect. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't know where you're getting your information. The guidelines are pretty clear though. What am I incorrect on? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Did you read what I wrote? Both Madara Rider and Madara Peak are both regularly called just "Madara", so listing them as I did is perfectly acceptable. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I obviously know you're saying to me. However, the fact is that both those pages do not explicitly convey something like "also known as Madara" or "simply known as Madara". That's what WP:PIPING#Exceptions pretty much tells us. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

These have nothing to do with piping at all. This is the same thing as a train station with the same name as a city, for example. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Then Nihonjoe, you're better off asking for clarification at WT:MOSDAB or WT:WPDIS. I have nothing more to reveal to you at this time. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

DB Names

I totally don't remember that conversation anymore. What was the reason we said Funi dubs/subs over the manga, when all others use the manga? Re the redirects, if nothing else is called "Oob" and "Ubu" why are their pages for them? I see no reason to clutter the character list with those redirect templates or to presume someone typing in "Oob" means a minor character in a niche media over one of the others. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Dunno, the majority of editors just opted for that, probably because of WP:COMMONNAMES or something. If you dig hard enough through the archives, you'll find it. Look for the discussion that User:A Link to the Past initiated. And about the hatnoting, how is it clutter? If that's the only topic that goes by that spelling of the name, then there should not be anything wrong with it. Believe me, when it comes to dabbing, this kind of stuff goes into play. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Its cluttering because there are two stacked in a very short section on what appears to be a really minor character. I wonder if that decision came before the changes at the MoS to go with primary over secondary if both are in English? Hmmm....-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Hang on, I'll combine it into one hat. Oh, did you find the archive? I seem to remember that it took place during last summer. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Tupac.

Hello.

I believe that this discussion might interest you.

Thanks. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 23:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Heh, I actually just saw it, but it doesn't really interest me at the time being. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Chi

Pray tell, what's the meaning of this reversion: [1] ? Chi (尺) was a standard unit of length in China until the early 20th century, and is frequently mentioned in historical literature in English - certainly in a lot more books than arpent or arshin. (Incidentally, it's shaku in Japanese). Vmenkov (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

There was no reference in those links to "chi" or similar, the entire edit was redundant. If you don't like the guidelines WP:DAB and MoS:DP, please initiate a discussion on WT:WPDIS. Regards, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Handphone

"Says who?" isn't a valid reason to undo my changes in the cell phone article. I already put my reasons in the discussion page. You want further proof it's not standard English?Go here: [2] . You see it says Malaysia? Do a search on the internet for handphone and you'll see only Southeast Asian countries, as well as Korea companies being the ones who call it that.

Also quoting an international newspaper where the native language isn't English shouldn't be used as a source. Living in Korea now, I know there's plenty of Konglish words as well that are wrong from standard English that appear in newspapers written by non native speakers. They call a convertible "open car" in Korea. Does that mean I should go to the convertible article and put "also known as a open car" and list it first as well?

Furthermore all the other cell phone names are more commonly used in native English speaking countries, so they should be listed before handphone. Again "says who" doesn't warrant an "undo." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluesoju (talk • contribs) 01:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't really undo the edit, it was more of a partial revert actually. Look at what was modified [3]. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Shine

Hello.

I'm sorry that I didn't discuss this first. I was unaware of this rule. I just wanted to add this info, because it was missing in the list of songs with the title "Shine".

Again I apologize for my behavior.

Vuurvosje74 (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

MOS:DABRL & Milk (disambiguation)

Re. Milk (disambiguation) when I mistakenly added a non-existent category (before I new about MOS:DABRL), you wrote: "Again, familiarize yourself with MOS:DABRL" I have no record (at least, I cannot find one) of anyone previously referring me to MOS:DABRL, so I'm not sure why you wrote "Again".--Tyranny Sue (talk) 11:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

They're not categories, and you apparently didn't view that link (or bother to read everything) in my earlier edit summary. Why else would I say "again"? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Tupac Shakur

You are both guilty of edit warring over a content dispute. Article edit protected for 3 days; I'm not blocking either of you for your WP:3RR violations, but be aware next time it might be different, depending on circumstances and which admin takes a look. You two need to discuss this on the article talk page and work things out. KillerChihuahua^?!? 05:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback and 3RR

Hello, Sesshomaru, I am here to let you know that I feel that you have misused the rollback tools on the edits here and here. Rollback is strictly for reverting vandalism only. Edits such as these would have been better suited with an undo, a descriptive reason as to why the action was done, and proper discussion on the talk page. As such, I am warning you that any further misuse of the rollback function will result in you having the feature taken away. Also, be warned that you and Gamer112 are quickly approaching an edit war. If you both continue to revert over and over you both may eventually be blocked for a 3RR violation. Please engage in constructive discussion on the talk page before making such edits. Regards, Icestorm815 • Talk 00:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

My main concern is that the edits were reverted and that there was no discussion with the user on your talk page, his/her talk page, or the article's talk page for the edits that were made yesterday. The user may have not made edits that conform to policy, but it wasn't any form of vandalism. The user was trying to make an honest effort to contribute and much frustration has been building up due to the lack of communication. Also, I don't want you to think that I singled you out in any way. I did talk to Gamer112 about the same thing as I did with you and SemBubenny was not involved in the recent reverts. I want you to know that I greatly appricate that you did talk to Gamer112 and have tried to initiate conversation. Hopefully that will sort things out. Cheers, Icestorm815 • Talk 19:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment on Tupac Shakur

I have made a comment on the discussion you are having on the talk page of Tupac Shakur.--Iner22 (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Watchmen

Sorry about the hatnote. For some reason, I got the impression that Watchmen used to be Watchmen (disambiguation), and that it was moved (in my fantasy world, because the film attracted attention to create topics of the same name). I understand why now, though. :P Thanks for fixing my error. —Erik (talk • contrib) 22:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

No problemo ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

On Poetic Justice (1993 film)

Hi, I answered here Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages).-DePiep (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Your reaction sounds strange to me. Could you explain the irony or whatever it is? -DePiep (talk) 21:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for sounding like an idiot, but where exactly is the discussion again? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:51, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Aidoflight

Hi there,

I think this user doesn't understand some of the key fiction-related policies and guidelines. The sort of thing you see on Doctor Druid is common from this user. I think they are contributing in good faith, but just see what a mess Doctor Strange has become, for example. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 23:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Only reason why I didn't revert Aidoflight at Doctor Strange is because of the sourcing (s)he's done there. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Bane (comics)

Hi, would you care to be specific - on the GA review page about what is copyrighted material in the article. I may well have missed it. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I removed {{Non-free}}. At first, there seemed to be too many fair use images, though now that I think about it this isn't my area of interest anymore. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

How to phrase "Jim" carrey

Your question of why the phrasing "James Eugene Carrey (born January 17, 1962), best known as Jim Carrey," is better or worse is a valid question. It hinges on the fact that "Jim" is not a nickname in the classic sense but rather a diminutive, or sortening, of "James". As opposed to a "true" nickname that is derived from circumstance, like "Sting" or "Shoeless Joe". So "Jim Carrey" isn't a replacement for his name, it really is his name, just the short form. Whereas no one would be expected to believe "Bono" is short for anything. Hope that clears it up. If not, pop by my talkpage and let me know how I can help. Padillah (talk) 12:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello!

You seem to always have pretty good judgment, so I'm wonding if you'd mind taking a look here. I've proposed merging List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System emulators into List of video game console emulators, and maybe merging List of Nintendo Entertainment System emulators after it's been trimmed down a bit. I just kinda don't see why they should exist apart from that one list. Any input would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!  :) Lychosis ^T/C 00:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to help, but unfortunately I'm way too exhausted from work today to get involved in a discussion. Appreciate the invite though ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

'Kay! Thanks anyway! Feel free to pop in and look some other time, if you like. I hope you don't mind that I'll probably wind up bothering you with something like this again, I'm trying to get more involved on Wikipedia after a ridiculously long period of inactivity.  :) Lychosis ^T/C 00:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Carole Boston Weatherford

Thanks for fixing what needed fixing--I hadn't gotten that far, out of sheer negligence. ;) Drmies (talk) 05:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Good to see you are still working on the Wikipedia project :) Wikizeta (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Readjustment help

Hey Sess, I know It's been a while. I have just returned from my extended Wiki break, I would like to ask you of any significant events that happened pertaining to the Dragon Ball articles while I took my leave of absence. Thanks again and if you have the time, please look over my proposed changes at the Dragon Ball workforce talk page. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 20:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I am really glad to see that consensus has finally been reached on the names. I personally prefer the manga names, but really, thats not whats important. I do however, want to push for more cleaning up of the Dragon Ball articles (the character list in particular needs major cutting), and more merges (I did sucessfully finish up one for a video game, see Dragon Ball Z: Supersonic Warriors (series)). The reason I quit was, well, a combination of a lot of things. It was mostly wikistress though, as the Saga articles and the complaints I recieved from them, plus all the edit conflicts and wars and ludicriously long disscussions. Hopefully, my wikibreak has let me recover from all this, and I should be around for quite a while. Also, check out my propositions for the Dragon Ball articles at the Talk page for the Dragon Ball work group. Anyway, its great to be back, DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 22:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Galactus Article problems

Hi, I'd very much appreciate if you could help to mediate in the seemingly neverending Galactus problem? Dave (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Galactus? Sorry but I'm no expert on him, and I almost hate to get involved in edit wars. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Yukishiro

I have nominated Yukishiro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukishiro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andrewjlockley (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

In your opinion...

Does this person strike you as incredibly similar to our old acquaintance Jupiter Optimus Maximus (aka Illustrious One, aka YourLord)? The contribution history seems very similar to me, with similar patterns (unreferenced psychoanalysis of fictional characters, adding categories related to such, concern over List of fictional narcissists, etc.). Also he identifies as being from Chester, England, and all of JOM's previous IPs trace to the same general area (Manchester, Liverpool, & Chester, which are adjacent to each other). There's enough of a similarity here for me to consider opening up a SPI, but I thought I'd ask for second opinions first. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Wow. That's definitely him. Can the guy be any more obvious? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Case opened at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/YourLord. Comments are welcome. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Pokemon Lists

What was with you reverting them back to before I did stuff to them and then undid them? lol. Did you realize I was actualy doing a good job or something? --Blake (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Just forget it. That was a mere misunderstanding. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 11:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

disambiguation question

Hello, I noticed your edit at AL article, can you please indicate me the guide that indicates that? I will do it that way too, just want to make sure i know exactly why. Thanks Ark25 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC).

Sure. Familiarize yourself with WP:MoS:DP#Individual entries and WP:PIPING. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 11:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Another disambiguation query

Re this revert - I thought WP:PIPING#Exceptions wouldn't apply to Eugene (wrestler) because of how it's disambiguated, ie it fails the "...and could serve as an alternative name for the target article" requirement? eg Paris, France could serve as an alternative name, but Paris (France) couldn't (because in practice, bracketed disambiguations always get piped)...? 58.8.7.75 (talk) 23:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, it doesn't really matter if we put the redirect into practice or not. Feel free to revert, I was just trying to make a point across. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. As currently only a single article links to Eugene (wrestler) but there are over 650 links to Nick Dinsmore, if you've no objection then I will revert it. 58.8.7.75 (talk) 11:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Go for it ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

TV.com

According to this previous discussion: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_34#TV.com

The biographies on TV.com are user-editable and should not be used. The stories on TV.com written by staff and indexed by Google news are reliable. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Lupin III Good Article Reassessment

As a major contributor to Lupin III, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Lupin III/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring

I hate to see any edit warring, so I have opened up a discussion here to try and prevent it from escalating. Please comment or state your concerns there instead of in the edit summaries of reversions so that further edit-warring can be averted. Thanks. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Saw it. However, I decided not to get involved in this trivial matter. If some editor wants to de-italicize every instance of "Pokémon" on Wikipedia, then, I could care less ... Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

TLC?

Hi Sesshomaru... I am just wondering exactly what the problem is with the TLC entry I added. I am puzzled :) Westerreich (talk) 13:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

goku vs. vegeta png file

have any idea who might have deleted tat image i posted in the article Vegeta? the big thing with the kamehameha and garlic gun from saiyan saga. it wasn't you, was it? Krishvanth (talk) 20:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

No clue. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Dont bother. Found who deleted it from the article. Dont really blame the person 100% (hey, i'm human so i'll blame him a few %'s) but i've no idea why the image itself was deleted (i dint get any second orphaned notification either) when a replacement is not available for it. Oh well... life.... free..... Krishvanth (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Sailor Moon delisted

As a major contributor to Sailor Moon, this notice is to let you know that the article recently underwent a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article was delisted as a Good Article for failing the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Sailor Moon/GA1. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

DBZ character talk page

Hey mate. I'm asking if you'd be interested to check out the section I opened on the DBZ character talk page in regards to merging. It deals with moving many of the characters listed in the secondary section to the other (tertiary) section, as many more influential and important characters have now been merged or deleted. It would only be proper to sustain and maintain the same consensus on the entire page; I haven't made any changes as of yet as it may not be considered constructive to move characters without a proper debate. Those that are debatable, I've listed them in the same format and hope to get your vote for keeps and merges into the other section. I've only listed the ones I've found to be primarily lesser appearing characters and who are limited to one or two sagas at the most in their appearance, or remain background characters for the most part. As many of the characters who are listed in the secondary section are actually much lesser than those in the other, I was hoping to hear from you and get your votes on the matter. - Zarbon (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Category removal.

Thanks for removing those categorys from the project space articles. I meant to take those off today, but got sidetracked. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 23:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

No prob ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputing undone edit

Hey, I don't understand the reason why you undid my edit on Tupac Shakur's page. I double spaced the entire article, removed many redundant links, and was then told I was overlinking the page because I linked things like Nevada and California...I don't see why adding some insubstantial links why improving the neatness of a very messed up page should result in a complete undoing.

I'm not trying to start a fight here, just interested...Thanks in advance, JustW353 (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Dates are not to be wiki-linked (MOS:UNLINKDATES), non-existent links like Chuck Phillips shouldn't be removed per WP:RED and you overlinked a number of common things for nothing. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

I could have undone all the unneeded link...If it's alright with you, can I undo your edit and remove all the links I added? That way I can remove the redundant links, keep the slightly rewritten areas, and keep it double spaced? JustW353 (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

The links were removed but, what rule says it is best to "double space"? And what do you plan to rewrite exactly? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Where can I find this "official Wikipedia rulebook"?JustW353 (talk) 00:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:PG is probably what you're looking for. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Well from what I read on Talk:Double-spaced sentences, there is no official rule on spacing after periods, but I personally think it makes a large page easier to read. JustW353 (talk) 00:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Ball hatnotes

Every time I've tried to remove them in the past, I've been reverted by you, so it seems best to start here. Those hatnotes in the character list are an eyesore, and those characters really aren't important enough to need to be accessed directly through redirects that should just go to the dab pages instead. All of those redirects should definitely be changed to go to the disambiguation pages, and if any of them have history, they should be moved to something like "No. 17 (Dragon Ball)" beforehand. TTN (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I could see the removal of the "(number)" hat. It's probably the most out of place one there. If it weren't for WP:HNP, the hats would be at their respective sections anyway. But, see where Vizard takes you for instance. I'd rather we follow that layout instead of re-redirecting those things to disambiguation pages. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Overall, other than Shen Long, none of the redirects really are useful, though. I doubt anyone is actually going to use Bū or "Ūbu to search, and given how minor the character is, it is unnecessary to give it priority for "Oob." I would also say the the mythological dragon is probably more important than the character. TTN (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

OK, I guess we'll just keep the Shen Long hat, though should we go with the Vizard layout? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Link (character)

Just to let you know I reverted your edits. I believe that the video game character to be more deserving of the redirect than sharing it with the Matrix character, who is less famous and has an article on the verge of deletion. Either way, there's still a "Link (character) redirects here, for other characters..." on the Zelda guy's page Purplebackpack89 (talk) 03:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Whatever. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Avatar

Responded to your comment on the Avatar DAB Oldag07 (talk) 05:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

{{Recent death}}

Please see this discussion which is related to a proposed change to {{Recent death}}. An example of how this change would appear is on this userpage. --Brian McNeil /^talk 00:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)