Welcome

edit

Hello, Sfthenerd, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 20:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

In response to your feedback

edit

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you're helping to improve Wikipedia. Every edit counts! If you ever need help editing, please try Help desk and the help pages. Hope you have a great time here!

Vincent Liu (something to say?) 05:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)  Reply

January 2013

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Meritorious Service Medal (United States), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. S. Rich (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Short-lived"?

edit

Hi. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. You recently added the description "short-lived" to several articles about musical bands. For some of these, such a description seems slightly odd to me. For example, Conspiracy (band) were active over at least a 6-year period (14 years if you include their existence as The Chris Squire Experiment, and there's talk of a revival of the project). The Buggles only had 4 years originally, but have had reunions in 1998, 2004, 2009, 2010 and 2011.

Such judgements over whether something was "short-lived" or not can be difficult to make objectively. One way of avoiding such uncertainty is to make sure an article is clear about the dates a band is active, i.e. using actual numbers rather than a subjective phrase. Another way is to rely on what reliable sources say rather than trying to make the judgement ourselves. Bondegezou (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to United States Navy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Please use the preview button to review your edits before saving them. If it was your intention to post the out-sized Navy emblem, then be advised that such edits constitute vandalism and will not be tolerated.Otherwise, thank you for your contributions.S. Rich (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summaries

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with your edits. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries tell others of your intent and help when reviewing the article's history. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 05:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's been a few days, so I don't recall for sure. I think it was this edit [1] that prompted my note. It was more than a typo fix. I do appreciate the work you've done on the DWM article. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 06:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Per WP:MINOR, any time you are adding or removing content in an article, you should not check the minor edit box. A quick review of your contributions indicates that you are either unaware of this distinction, or completely ignoring it. Continued inappropriate use of this check box could be construed as disruptive editing, and could result in editing sanctions. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

My pleasure, S. Rich:) Sfthenerd (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Coastguardpttest.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Coastguardpttest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gloria Estefan albums discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twelve Inch Mixes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Sfthenerd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Sfthenerd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Sfthenerd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits - Final warning

edit

  You have been asked several times over a period of years to stop marking as minor edits that are not minor. Carefully read WP:MINOR and change your editing habits accordingly. Inappropriately marking edits as minor is deceptive and violates the norms of collaborative editing. If there is something about minor edits that you don't understand, ask here on this talk page immediately, before you make another edit. Otherwise, the next time you inappropriately mark an edit as minor you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I appreciate the wake-up call, I am only trying to do better Sfthenerd (talk) 03:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Scottish clans

edit

Please refrain from adding unsourced information to infoboxes as it is disruptive! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I was confused for a while about allies/rivals and how they were considered Sfthenerd (talk) 07:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

About the List of tartans, could you please format the links you use as citations. It will help the software keeps them updated. Thanks. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oh, of course; just out of curiosity, how do I say it when I save the change? Sfthenerd (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oh, never mind, got it figured out Sfthenerd (talk) 08:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Research

edit

Hi. Just to note that it is not enough for you to note that you've done some research in your edit summaries. You need to demonstrate this by citing a reliable source. Otherwise no-one knows what your research consisted of, and whether it has any validity. Note especially that Wikipedia does not permit use of original research. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Sfthenerd (talk) 08:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on List of tartans

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of tartans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

You were asked to stop making changes to clan/tartan lists here without citing reliable sources, but you are back at it again. Your recent claims added to List of tartans were removed. The claim about Clan Heron is not supported by any of the sources already present, and you did not provide a new one that supports your claim. The claim about Clan Leask was also without a source, and proves incorrect; the tartan I can find for Leask is similar to one of several Hay tartans but it still different. Maybe Leask should be added, but it needs to be done with a source citation.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Also, please stop pasting in bare URLs as if they are source citations. See WP:Citing sources, and for most of your use cases Template:Cite web.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the misunderstanding; didn't mean to accidentally repeat it; thank you for helping with sources. Sfthenerd (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply