Shaktisira
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aurobindo Pharma, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.aurobindo.com/docs/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aurobindo Pharma
edit
A tag has been placed on Aurobindo Pharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 20:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Shaktisira (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
please review the article once again
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit
{{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the page)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Someguy1221 (talk) 06:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Also, Shaktisira, with regard the article on the Scientific Edge, you have added information from the book itself, but not why it is notable. A book is not notable by virtue of anything it contains, but rather by how the outside world perceives it. Please see Wikipedia:Notability for more information. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 21:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 22:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 10:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 16:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 17:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
JECRC Jaipur
editHi there Shaktisira. You recently submitted this, but it has been declined because all articles need to have reliable, independent sources discussing the subject in detail - not just a list, in other words. Please add citations from books, newspapers, magazines, online articles (not blogs) to establish notability, and the resubmit. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions. :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 15:17, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Did you read Wikipedia:Notability (books)? The basic requirement is at leas two independent reliable substantial sources. Multiple means more than one. You have one review, and an interview, and rest do not seem to be independent. The interview was more about the person than the book. If you can get one more substantial independent reliable source about the book then it would be counted as notable and accepted. The text is also likely to be trimmed as it is almost all a summary of the book, and not so much about its impact in the world. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 23:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Shaktisira,
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. As you must have noticed, your article has now been declined many times by several different reviewers. Please do not take this personally - the team consists of volunteers with very different backgrounds and experiences, but it is clear we all consider the article not to be suitable for Wikipedia in its current form.
There are numerous ways of publishing articles on the Internet, including your own website, blog, facebook page and so on. There are forums where you can submit statements and join discussions. However, Wikipedia is none of these things: it is an encyclopedia, and we have clear and strict rules (see WP:42) on what constitutes suitable content.
I am sorry this article has not proved suitable, but I do hope you will enjoy using and contributing to Wikipedia in the future. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Your article submission The Scientific Edge
edit
Hello Shaktisira. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Scientific Edge.
If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scientific Edge}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e deckertalk 16:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission JECRC Jaipur
edit Hello Shaktisira. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled JECRC Jaipur.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JECRC Jaipur}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)