I will respond to all messages posted on my talk page, on my talk page. So make sure you add it to your watchlist.

Welcome from Redwolf24

edit

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 3 December 2024 T 00:47 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Re: My User Page

edit

Thanks for the edit. However, that google template should be capitalized, if I'm not mistaken. --Winter 23:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I was mistaken. --Winter 00:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tornado Drive

edit

Tornado Drive to file-sharing websites, but it was declined due to sharing not legal content? What is meant by sharing not legal content. All of the file-sharing websites let users share any type of content. And i haven't noticed any by tornadodrive.

Most important is that file sharing is not only P2P-networks, but also webservices like Tornado Drive. (Elmagnon 04:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC))Reply

I uploaded a new version of the cover of the New Found Glory DVD, if that's alright with you. I got rid of the DVD case around it and the dust in the corners, and I also adjusted the colors to look more like the original. HarryCane 12:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Dane Cook

edit

Explanation was provided on the talk page — that section provides no sources. It probably should stay removed until verification of such accusations. --bbatsell | « give me a ring » 23:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

NJ Collaboration of the Week

edit

Thanks for participating in Wikiproject New Jersey. In an attempt to create articles for some of the non-existing pages related to New Jersey, NJCOTW was recently created to bring members of WP:NJ together to work collaboratively on a certain selected topic, which this week is List of Governors of New Jersey. Please help by nominating/voting/commenting on articles on WP:NJCOTW, or by helping to improve articles in the scope of the topic for the NJCOTW. AndyZ 00:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cover for Rise Against's new abum

edit

Hey. I was just wondering where you found the cover for Rise Against's new album The Sufferer and the Witness (you just uploaded)? Mike Garcia 03:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

From here. [1] sharpdust 20:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

All Downhill from Here article

edit

Please don't move the "All Downhill from Here" article back to it's name with a capital F. According to Wikipedia guidelines, prepositions should not be capitalised. Thanks. --HarryCane 18:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please help on Mathematics

edit
 
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Mathematics was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by Pruneau 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the AID Maintenance TeamReply

Jordan Pundik

edit

Oh, my bad. *Feels embarrassed* . . . :) WereWolf 9:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Cartel_band.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Cartel_band.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Guy

edit

You recently told me off for experimenting with the page Fading Days. This was in fact my brother on the same computer, not me. Deaths_hand 16:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE: Snakes on a Plane

edit

I'm sorry if the summary made no sense. I had no idea what to put there and I've been scorned for making edits w/o a summary. It makes me look like a vandal and I was trying to fix vandalism on this article so sorry for confusion. Fableheroesguild 04:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Ian Grushka

edit

Ian Grushka simply redirects to the page for New Found Glory, not to any page about the musician. This needs fixing. Jubella 18:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have fixed it. Not sure why that was redirected, but thanks for the taking notice of it. sharpdust 06:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

New Found Glory picture

edit

I took the new image (Image:Newfoundgloryy.jpg) from the New Found Glory because it didn't have sufficient copyright information (which the old one (Image:New Found Glory.jpg) had), not because it's not a promotional photo. I couldn't care less if someone put a newer picture in the article (even though I don't see the point, given there has been no line-up or stylistic changes in the band), as long as the copyright status is OK. However, your copying my fair use rationale from the old image and signing with my name is a Wikipedia policy violation, and I will have you know that I am going to report you for that. Have a good day, HarryCane

Report he did, and you earned youself a 24 hour time out. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yo dude, I realize that copying/pasting the copyright info from the old picture wasn't what I should have done. I apologize for that. To be honest, I didn't read the copyright info and just put it in there without even looking at it because I figured it would be a suitable since it's just another New Found Glory promotional photo.
Realize something else though, you need to calm down sometimes. I've seen a lot of what you put on Wikipedia and most of the time you are too quick to revert people's edits (this is not referring to the above) without discussing it first. You act like you "control" an article. As a result you always try to be nasty about it in the edit summaries. And with this, whether or not you think it, you're being pretty nasty by saying "Have a good day," which to me sounds like "you're fucked".
Anyways, I'm not going to get into this anymore. You can control your articles, I'm not even going to attempt to help out with them. sharpdust 17:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Coming Home track listing

edit

Would you mind telling me why you deleted the track listing from the Coming Home article? Most of the songs you keep replacing it with are no more confirmed than the track listing that was posted on AP.net. I see where you're coming from, but would it really hurt to post a tentative track listing instead of a random collection of probably incorrect song names? --HarryCane 20:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

What is up now is not a random collection of incorrect song names. In the latest NFG bio by Geffen, they state a lot of the song names [2] (also see MTV article: [3]). I consider both of those links to be legit sources. Whereas, the AP article [4] states in the title "rumored tracklisting" and it was submitted by some random person who could have just pulled the remaining 3 tracks out of nowhere.
My bad, I didn't notice the bio thing. I thought they were just random names picked up by someone at a show or something, since it wasn't referenced. You're right then. Sorry. --HarryCane 10:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Howdy

edit

Heya, saw your comment on the talk page for Cross Country Running. Have to say, your signature is cool. How do you get it to change colors like that? --Raguleader 21:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, check out this: WP:SIGNATURE#Customizing_your_signature. Here is the code that I used in my signature.
[[User:Sharpdust|<span style="color:orange">sharp</span>]][[User_talk:Sharpdust|<span style="color:green">dust</span>]]
sharpdust 15:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Adam Goucher.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam Goucher.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image:Less Than Jake promo photo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Less Than Jake promo photo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 17:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

More replaceable fair use images

edit

Chowbok 16:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Against_me_promo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Against_me_promo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 20:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Rosie_ruiz.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosie_ruiz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Americans Abroad!!! Against Me!!! Live In London!!!.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Americans Abroad!!! Against Me!!! Live In London!!!.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:CartelChroma.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:CartelChroma.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Cartel_chroma_rerelease.jpg

edit

I have tagged Image:Cartel_chroma_rerelease.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 08:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Non-free use disputed for Image:Punk_Goes_90s_cover.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Punk_Goes_90s_cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 22:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:With-love-and-squalor.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:With-love-and-squalor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sublime-forever free.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Sublime-forever free.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:For felix-rise above.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:For felix-rise above.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miniaturegolf.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Miniaturegolf.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Adhfh.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Adhfh.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject New Jersey advisory

edit
 
 
The WikiProject New Jersey Reboot

Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.

You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.

You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)

edit

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)

edit

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)

edit

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kevin lyttle cover.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Kevin lyttle cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Rowan West Campus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Rowan West Campus.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rowan West Campus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cartel (band)

edit
 

The article Cartel (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable band, lacks coverage in 3rd party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 03:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Cartel (band)

edit

I have nominated Cartel (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartel (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 12:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Reply

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)

edit

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)

edit

User page

edit

I deleted it as requested. Bearian (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kevin Lyttle (album)

edit
 

The article Kevin Lyttle (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:NALBUM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Runningwiththebuffaloes.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Runningwiththebuffaloes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Everyone's Got a Girlfriend

edit
 

The article Everyone's Got a Girlfriend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, and no sources quoted after over 4 years with a banner

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rankersbo (talk) 07:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:For felix-everyones got a girlfriend.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:For felix-everyones got a girlfriend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MC Lars - The Laptop EP.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:MC Lars - The Laptop EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sublime-forever free.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Sublime-forever free.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:For felix-rise above.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:For felix-rise above.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply