Shepazu
|
Coworking
editIt's under discussion, and there are currently open questions about it. Please help resolve the issues with other editors. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Wolfson (February 2)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Wolfson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Shepazu,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamietw (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Wolfson (February 19)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Wolfson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Jack Wolfson
editHello, Shepazu. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jack Wolfson".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Web Audio API concern
editHi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Web Audio API, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Web Audio API
editHello, Shepazu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Web Audio API".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 22
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pike County, Missouri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: James Thatcher (computer scientist) has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Shepazu
Thank you for creating James Thatcher (computer scientist).
User:OxonAlex, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Sourcing isn't amazing, but think they're notable enough.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|OxonAlex}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
~~ OxonAlex - talk 20:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
@OxonAlex: Thanks for the amazingly prompt approval! I'd like to know what improvements are needed in the sourcing. My methodology was to keep citations limited to several well-established, stable, credible organizations relevant to the field of computer science and accessibility, as well as an interview into the history of the screen reader. Would it help to cite multiple sources for the primary claim for Jim Thatcher as the inventor of the screen reader (they do exist), or should I employ a different methodology? Looking at the grading scheme, Start status indicates, "Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more." As a relatively inexperienced Wikipedia contributor, I would like to understand what would get this article to C status, "Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study" or even B status. My operating assumption was that readers would be seeking more information on his most notable achievement, the invention of the screen reader, and that this would be sufficient for that. But if more biographical data is needed, we could add that too. For context, this was part of a community effort by a set of digital accessibility professionals, so any information provided will help multiple contributors. Shepazu (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC)