User talk:Shrike/Archives/2013/January

Hey

Could you post whether or not you support my changes at Colonialism on the talk page? Thanks.Evildoer187 (talk) 23:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

====

Hello, About the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_War

Actually I've NOT discussed the reliability of Haaretz.... I discussed the reliability of the story :).... Allegations shouldn't be considered as a fact.... As I said on the article, No accurate prove except one line in a newspaper report without "OFFICIAL ISRAELI ASSURANCE" or neutral other assurance....

--elbarck (talk) 02:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Shrike. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zero^talk 09:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Khazars article

Hi Shrike,

I don't have online access to that article but I can try to scan it for you. Best, GabrielF (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Shrike/Archives/2013. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

maybe this

[1] Zero^talk 11:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks I will download it in five-six hours--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 12:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Since there is no author given (just a special-interest group as sponsor), no provenance of the documents, and an explicitly propagandistic purpose (to pressure UNSCOP and UN members on the lead-up to the 1947 partition vote), it would be pretty hard to argue it meets WP:RS. Zero^talk 12:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

But as I understand the quote doesn't appear there anyhow.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 12:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I can't find it. Maybe you can, but I don't think so. Zero^talk 12:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

SPI

Well done. I thought that was a possibility. Let me know next time you suspect a sock. Thanks again. Dougweller (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

AFD

Shrike, why don't you add your source to the bottom of the page instead of amending your initial comment that has already been responded to? I was very careful to look at all the comments before I expressed an opinion, which I based on the evidence that had been presented at that time. If more sources come to light after my comment that is fine, but you should add them chronologically, not amend your original comment that people already have responded to. Dlv999 (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

You right I will deal with this later.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 08:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

HathiTrust

Do you remember that request[2]. Do you have download access to Hathitrust?--Antemister (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I think there is a full view [3]?--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:17, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

There is full view, but I would like zu upload them on Commons, for download and offline use.--Antemister (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I have no access.I suggest ask again and maybe someone with access will help you.--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Moderation of Jerusalem RfC

Hello. You are receiving this message because you have recently participated at Talk:Jerusalem or because you were listed at one of the two recent requests for mediation of the Jerusalem article (1, 2). The Arbitration Committee recently mandated a binding request for comments about the wording of the lead of the Jerusalem article, and this message is to let you know that there is currently a moderated discussion underway to decide how that request for comments should be structured. If you are interested in participating in the discussion, you are invited to read the thread at Talk:Jerusalem#Moderation, add yourself to the list of participants, and leave a statement. Please note that this discussion will not affect the contents of the article directly; the contents of the article will be decided in the request for comments itself, which will begin after we have finalised its structure. If you do not wish to participate in the present discussion, you may safely ignore this message; there is no need to respond. If you have any questions or comments about this, please leave them at my talk page. Best regards — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 12:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

The Invention of the Jewish People

Hi Shrike. It appears you have violated 1RR at The Invention of the Jewish People. Please be more careful in the future. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I was reverting a blatant sock that was blocked .So it was not a violation--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 17:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

My apologies then. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

RE: Andy's talk page

I'd suggest you discontinue interacting with Andy; in the interest of not complicating things, I don't need you guys butting heads while there are allegations of NPA violations flying both ways. I'd appreciate it. Cheers, m.o.p 11:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 11:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

The plan to exterminate jews of Palestine on Haj Amin page

I fixed the link but I don't know what to write more from the cited places about Haj Amin's involvement (I used an exact quote from the book)109.226.53.18 (talk) 12:25, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Was my addition meaningless, because I see it had been removed ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.226.53.18 (talk) 16:01, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. :) --LlamaAl (talk) 20:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)