User talk:Shudde/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Welcome back

Long time no see around here.-gadfium 21:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Good to see you back Buddy :)) ..--Stemoc (talk) 05:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help! Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1273 submissions waiting to be reviewed. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Frank Hadden'

Thank you for your contributions to the article 'Frank Hadden'. Sadly, a link that you added has died. The article needs your help to repair link rot.

This link has died after you added it in November 2006:

• http://sport.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1060&id=1586232006 — I tried to load this link on 20 March, 22 March, 24 March and today but it never worked.

I've marked this link with {{Dead link}}, but I'm just a bot, so I don't really know how to fix the problem. Could you please take a look? Thanks!

PS- If you don't want BlevintronBot to contact you, simply add {{bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or your user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand national rugby union team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

Hello Shudde. You recently applied for a Wikimedia IRC cloak, but it looks like you forgot to register your nickname first. Could you please log on to IRC and do:

/msg NickServ REGISTER <password> <email>

where <password> is a password of your choice and <email> is your e-mail address? After you do that, please follow the instructions that are e-mailed to you to confirm your e-mail address. When you're done with that, I just need you to confirm your cloak request:

/msg MemoServ send wmfgc IRC cloak request

After you finish all of that, I'd be happy to get you a cloak. :-) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --Filip (§) 23:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Ellison

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Carte Goodwin

Shudde, I disagree with your decision for immediately fail Carte Goodwin, and insist you change your decision and actually allow me some time to improve it based on your suggestions. It meets no quick-fail criteria, and it deserves an appropriate amount of time to be improved like any other GA candidate. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 04:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Also in your suggestions, you say "You never say who appointed Goodwin to the Senate seat? I'm assuming it was Manchin." In the very first sentence of the Senate section "On July 16, 2010, Manchin appointed Goodwin to the U.S. Senate seat," so I don't mean to be rude, but I don't feel you spent an appropriate amount of time on this article. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 04:53, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

I spent a lot of time on the article — the fact that there is an error there does not prove otherwise. I read the article before deciding to review it, and then another 30 minutes going through the article once I decided to give it a review. It was about 500-600 words of prose (excluding the lead); which just doesn't take as long to review as an article of greater length. The article did not meet the quick-fail criteria, but that doesn't mean it meets the WP:GACR! Also please keep in mind that WP:GAN is not a substitute for a peer review; it is not about submitting an article for review that clearly doesn't meet the criteria, having someone then spend the time saying why, and then giving the submitter time to bring the article up to standard. I don't think the article was broad enough (among other less significant problems), and that sufficient expansion of the article is not practical in seven days. Remember, that once it has been expanded, I have to review it again like a new review — it's not a trivial change to the article we're discussing here. You're welcome to submit the article to WP:GAR, but unless you think the article is actually broad in coverage, you may be better to spend your time expanding it, fix the problems I mentioned, then resubmit it to WP:GAN. - Shudde ^talk 05:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

While the article may not be the longest, I feel you're overestimating his political career. Even so, I can expand this article and address every comment you made well within 7 days. As for GACR, it does meet 3b, so I believe it at least deserves a review rather than a rubber-stamp fail. And although you're correct GAN isn't a place to submit non-quality articles, I disagree with you that this one is one of them. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 00:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I am repeating myself here, but I did a full review — please stop saying otherwise; it was not a "rubber-stamp fail". It was reviewed fully and I believe it fails criteria 3, and that the problems are substantial, not a case of the article being 90% there and only having a few things to fix. To quote Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles — "If the problems are substantial or extensive, the nomination can be failed. In the latter case, the editors at the article should be invited to renominate the article once it has been improved". This is what I have done. Like I said above, if you believe the article meets the Good Article Criteria, then take it to WP:GAR. That is the mechanism that the community has in place to resolve a disagreement like this. - Shudde ^talk 08:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

INeverCry 21:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Thanks for the review at Ernesto Perez Balladares. These are, um, Panamanian stroopwafels. Or something. But the point is, thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Cheers! Reviews can be quite rewarding when the nominator and reviewer see the process as collaborative, which it should be, rather than adversarial. Congratulations again. - Shudde ^talk 00:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi Shudde, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! INeverCry 19:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Patrick Keogh

Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Shudde. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/The Indian Princess (play).
Message added 09:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Page numbers and DOI added per your recommendations. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

(Sorry if that came across as a "why haven't you reviewed this yet!?" demand - I only noticed the page numbers had been added (and the article expanded again) a few minutes earlier myself, and though I'd let you know just in case you hadn't seen it. I realise now that it sounded a bit petulant; not the intended effect at all, I assure you! Yunshui 雲‍水 10:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC))

Don't apologise! I had intended to check the DYK page asap, but how was anyone to know? - Shudde ^talk 10:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom French Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Passchendaele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

1888–1889 New Zealand Native football team

Hope you find the cites acceptable, the Aukland Star report probably gives us enough to write up a report on the match, a game which historically seems to be clouded in mystery. Cheers FruitMonkey (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tom French Cup

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

1920 Rock Island season

Hey, I'm sorry I haven't been active. My uncle passed away earlier in the week, so I took a break from editing. I can restart the process now.
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 05:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. No problem, I was a couple of days away from closing it, but if you're back editing then I'll leave it on hold. Would be good if we could get it done relatively promptly. It might be a good idea to add a note to the GA review page so that any readers see that you are back. Sorry to hear about your Uncle. - Shudde ^talk 06:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Shudde. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_5#Category:Argentine_rugby_union_teams.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 1888–1889 New Zealand Native football team matches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Abdul Qadir

Hello, Shudde. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Abdul Qadir/archive1.
Message added Zia Khan. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk:Carolina Panthers/GA1

Hey, thanks for taking this on and doing a comprehensive review. I've replied to all of your concerns and comments - most have been dealt with, but I have given a couple comments as well. Toa Nidhiki05 21:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

I've responded to the new comments. Toa Nidhiki05 17:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please see Talk:No worries/GA2

Please see Talk:No worries/GA2.

I respectfully ask that you please reevaluate your position here.

I've done a good deal of research on this article.

It does provide a worldview.

It is drawn from multiple different secondary sources, the majority of which are not from Australia itself, but are independent reliable secondary sources.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter,

— Cirt (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Cool. I've read your comments and replied at the discussion page. Not sure why you are mentioning the use of secondary sources, this was never a problem, rather it was a broadness/POV issue (rather than any probs regarding RS or OR). Anyway hope you're satisfied with my response. I wasn't aware that you (the original nominator) hadn't been notified about the GAR, otherwise I would have let you know myself! - Shudde ^talk 11:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

"I still think it would be nice to have something in there about how common the expression is in New Zealand"

Do you know of any reliable and verifiable secondary sources that confirm this assertion? — Cirt (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

I probably should have phrased it more carefully, but what I was saying is that some statement on the terms use (ie frequency) in NZ would be nice—I believe it is common, but am happy for a statement saying otherwise, as long as there is something on how common or not the term is! As there is a reference regarding its migration to NZ, I was hoping that ref's "Cryer 2006, p. 139" or "Hoffmann 2009, pp. 119–121" may say something, even if only that the term is used 'commonly', 'frequently', 'rarely', 'occasionally' etc. Maybe [1] will help—I don't have access to it unfortunately. [2] may be useful, but it's obviously intended for international students and I'm not sure how reliable it is. Even less reliable is [3]. Anyway hope those are useful. - Shudde ^talk 09:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

List of Kings Island attractions FLC

I have addressed all the issues you mentioned on the review page.--Dom497 (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

I've addressed the other two issues.--Dom497 (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Done.--Dom497 (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

You already know what I'm going to say. ;) --Dom497 (talk) 18:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I promise this will be the last message I will leave you. On the review page, you left one comment out of the "resolved comments" box. I don't know if this was an error by you or you think that it hasn't been addressed, but I did fix it as Rambling Man mentioned the same thing in his review.--Dom497 (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I know-I left it there so it is clear I support. - Shudde ^talk 12:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Ellison FAC

I wasn't sure if you had finished responding at the FAC. If you ping me when you are ready, I'll have another look. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Changes looking good. If I get chance, I'll have another close look this week and maybe a little copy-editing myself. But I think we're getting there. Sarastro1 (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/John Neulinger/archive1

I just wanted to thank you for your excellent peer review. I'm going to try and get started on it this week. Viriditas (talk) 01:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

No problems. I'm glad it was helpful. - Shudde ^talk 12:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

It was. I'm just starting it now. Viriditas (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matt Burke may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Keith Davis (rugby union)

Can you separate the article into sections please? Thanks, George Ho (talk) 18:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure why, considering the article is so short (and you were welcome to do this yourself if you thought it would improve it), but ok. - Shudde ^talk 11:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Sonny Bill Williams

Hi Shudde. So i am going to add the controversies you removed into the relevant sections of SBW's playing career. Is that what you had in mind?Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh, i see what you have done. You added them in the Personal life section. But i think some more detail should be given like his tryst with the ironwoman - which was pretty big news.Suid-Afrikaanse (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Keith Davis (rugby union)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer review

Thanks for your useful comments here. I will address them when I have a bit of time. Cheers! JFW | T@lk 22:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Waisale Serevi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of 1888–89 New Zealand Native football team matches may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• } Of their rugby matches, they won 78, lost 23, and drew 6.{{sfn||2008 Inductee: J Warbrick ...}}}} The team played three internationals: a heavy loss to [[England national rugby union team|England]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

1877 Wimbledon Championship GA review

Hi Shude, just a heads up to let you know that the remaining issues of the 1877 Wimbledon Championship GA review have been addressed. Again thanks for taking the time to review the article.--Wolbo (talk) 05:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for completing the review of the 1877 Wimbledon Championship article and passing it for GA status (only the 10th GA article within the tennis WikiProject). I thought it was a good and thorough review and the points raised have certainly improved the article. It was fun working on it. I'm considering if it might be worthwhile to pursue it further and aim for A class status and finally FA but I'm unfamiliar with that process and unsure if the article would qualify. Any thoughts on that? Cheers, Wolbo. --Wolbo (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Request for help with peer review

Hello- I currently have an open peer review for List of Detroit Red Wings seasons that I am hopeful you could take a look at and provide input for. Based on your review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Barend Joseph Stokvis/archive1 and your work on such pages as List of 1888–89 New Zealand Native football team matches I think you may be just the person to help me take this article to the next level. Regards, Rejectwater (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Modification: I am hopeful you could please take a look at and provide input for. Cheers, Rejectwater (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll try and find time to give it a read over this weekend. - Shudde ^talk 01:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)