User talk:Shushugah/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

A goat for you!

hello nice edits :)

PR6029.R8 A6 (talk) 07:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Johann Kremenezky

Hello Shushugah,
thank you for your "Thank you". Also, thank you for the English article, which has long been necessary. Kremenezky has been working on me for a long time (see my photo of the grave) and I hope to expand the article in the German Wikipedia soon, I already got the literature for it. His achievements as a pioneer of the Austrian electrical industry have been forgotten, presumably also by the subsequent Nazi era.
To my deletion request: Please understand me correctly: of course I am also interested, that this photo can remain on Commons, it would probably be one of the best and probably was taken as the others by Shmuel Joseph Schweig. But since neither the photographer nor the date of the publication of the photo are mentioned in the source you mentioned and it is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, administrators should check this.
I am also interested in the true birth date of J.K. In the Hebrew Wikipedia Alexander Gabriel is cited with the date of birth October 25, 1848. Maybe you have access to https://www.jewishgen.org/databases/Ukraine/ or know someone who can access to check an entry. Greetings -- Walter Anton (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I didn't realize CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 is distinct from CC 4.0. I am in agreement to remove the photo. I have since figured out how to link the existing valid WikiCommons/CC from the Hebrew Wiki (the hebrew file name initially threw me off) to both the English and German pages. Figuring out the proper birth/death date is also vital task, as there are 3 conflicting sources. with 1848 and 1850 being the two disputed birth years, and within 1848 two disputed birth month/days. Based on the birth year, we could deduct the death year, because his age is documented. hence 1934/1936 death years. Shushugah (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Henderson v. United States (2013). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Big changes on Google Maps API

Dear user,

My english it's not so fluent to make changes at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Maps

Changes from June 11th until today (July 16th) can be seen at: https://developers.google.com/maps/billing/important-updates https://cloud.google.com/maps-platform/pricing/

Some comments on other sites: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/07/14/1837215/google-maps-api-becomes-more-difficult-and-expensive http://www.govtech.com/biz/Google-Maps-Restricts-its-API-Government-Collectively-Shrugs.html https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17531713

I started writing... [...] The Google Maps API is not free anymore. A Google Maps API key and credit card on file is now mandatory. Google will provide users a free US$200 credit toward those costs each month. Different kinds of access (static maps, dynamic maps, street view calls, etc) will consume those credits. Above those limits, credit card will be charged.[X] [...]

Feel free to make the changes accordingly.

Cheers, -Gilson Soares — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilson.soares (talk • contribs) 01:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Gilson.soares:, I'll look these over and add them most likely. On separate note, I noticed you edit a lot of Google pages, with info from google sources. Are you an employee of Google? It's okay if you are, but would be great if you added a disclosure sentence on your talk page, and or on any talk page of articles you edit. See WP:COI for more info. The way you asked me for help just now, was good :) Shushugah (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

ICE

I realize you're new here, but "3 months" isn't all that long. And if you "agree" with my tp comment there, then I'm not sure why you have further gutted that page, or why you edit warred to do so, all the while throwing out "bad faith" accusations. Neither you or that IP user have improved that page. I would suggest restoring the content, tagging what needs refs and improving any writing that needs improving. Mass-blanking does not fix articles. - ^theWOLFchild 16:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Benjamin Feigenbaum) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Benjamin Feigenbaum, Shushugah!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Benjamin Feigenbaum.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Missing page number

Hello Shushugah, I noticed the following edit, where you put a reference but with an incomplete page range. Thought you might like to fill the missing information in, as it's still missing in the article. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Police union at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Shushugah, it's been over three weeks since you began this nomination, but have never completed it by completing step 3 as noted above. If you are interested in pursuing the nomination, please do that step, and if you aren't, please tag the nomination page as noted above. If you would like help with any of these, please feel free to let me know. Something needs to be done soon, one way or the other. Thank you very much, and we appreciate your interest in Did you know. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Shushugah, this is your final call to proceed with the nomination. If you wish to pursue it, either transclude it yourself per the above, or you can ask my help here. However, if you don't do either of these things while remaining active elsewhere on Wikipedia, as you have been, I will consider the nomination abandoned and request that it be deleted. I hope you will respond. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solitary confinement of women in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page General population. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Organized Labour

I've created a membership card for you for the updating of the Organized Labour project, I hope this is ok. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Trade Union Federations on a global scale has been nominated for deletion

Category:Trade Union Federations on a global scale has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. czar 18:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

International Typographical Union

Hi Shushugah, I noticed that you moved International Typographical Union earlier this month. I think it should be moved back to its historic name. Per WP:MOSTCOMMON, this is its most common name. A search of Google for "Printing, Publishing and Media Workers" reveals just 2,720 hits, whereas a search for "International Typographical Union" reveals over 210,000 hits. This make sense since it was known as the ITU for 135 years prior to disbanding 34 years ago. A separate article should be made for the CWA-era locals.--User:Namiba 16:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

I was unsure about the edit myself as well. I'd be happy with redirecting Printing, Publishing and Media Workers to International Typographical Union. Ideally the new union/name has its own Wikipedia page. ~ Shushugah (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I am glad we are in agreement. Could you move it yourself or request that it be renamed?--User:Namiba 17:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit: See my move request here Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests Shushugah (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Y Done. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Anarchism

Hi Shushugah,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 05:42, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! It's always been a natural area of interest for me, but now it's official! ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Czar,

I just wanted to mention that I am preparing an online edit-a-thon involving WP:LABOUR that you might be interested in: The Tech Worker Coalition wants to improve the coverage of unions and unionisation in the technology sector from February 19 to 21. There's already quite a list of things to do, but few people to do them. If you're interested, drop by! Shushugah (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks—I will! czar 16:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome message

Hi @Shushugah, thank you for the message regarding my username and changes to the James Villa Holidays article. I wasn't aware this would be considered a conflict of interest - apologies. I have created a new username as you've advised to remove the association. The only change I was attempting to make was to update the ownership of the company as it was no longer valid...I notice this change has been implemented, so thank you for publishing the changes. When I reviewed the page I also noticed it is now proposed that this page be deleted. Please could you advise why you're proposing this? I would object to this being deleted.

Many thanks. KerrieC (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Alexa O'Brien

Shushugah, since your user page links to your Twitter account, I took the liberty of searching for your tweets tagging Alexa O'Brien, whose BLP and its talk page you edited today. You've evidently been a fan of hers for many years. That's fine, of course. But I wonder if you crossed paths IRL during her six-month stay in Berlin in 2014. I ask in the hope that you might suggest a way of documenting her falling out with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, which seems to have begun then. It's an important development that warrants inclusion in her BLP but obviously requires at least one WP:RS, perhaps in German that I might have overlooked due to my reading English only. Thanks for your help with this. NedFausa (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Minors in photographs

Many thanks. I am also not a lawyer but have an interest in open data in particular:

• Morrison, Robbie (12 February 2021). Open source software and open data: open licensing of software and data for public policy analysis and for collaborative research — Release 03 (PDF). doi:10.5281/zenodo.4537156. Retrieved 2021-02-12. Online presentation to Seminar – Introduction to Software Licensing in Europe, Chair of Civil Law, Technology, and IT Law, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, 10 February 2021.

Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 11:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI-tally

Hi,

I just noticed your edit. One editor you did not identify in the section you put me in, the one told his stance on 19:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC). Cheers! (just caught my eye, I did not make a full check).(KIENGIR (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC))

Dhadakebaaz need hand for copy-editing

Namaste , As you tag this article for need of CE. I suggest you WP:BOLD and start article improve yourself. Research Voltas (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I want your assistance .

Namaste I recently created a article Ghodasgaon, Jalgaon District.It is also available in Marathi Wikipedia but they're not linked to eachother. I want a reader can directly able to go from Marathi article to Eng and vice-versa. Research Voltas (talk) 12:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I am happy to do it for you, and also happy to explain how it's done. In English Wikipedia, if you go to "Languages" tab on the left side, and edit, you'll be prompted with edit the wikipedia language code, which is mr in this case, and then the name of the article in Marathi. That will automatically create/link a Wikidata item in the background. You can see the example for Jalgaon housing scam on the Wikidata item d:Q31737036. If you want me to do it, I need the name/link to the Marathi article Shushugah (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Also note, you linked to Ghodasgaon, Jalgaon District earlier, but it was a red link, because you created Ghodasgaon , Jalgaon District (with an extra whitespace before the comma). I fixed that for you, with a redirect link. Shushugah (talk) 12:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

• The name of Marathi WP article is घोडसगाव , the article is live on Marathi WP. You can search it on Google. Research Voltas (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Currently mr:घोडसगाव already is WP:Interwiki linked to English Wiki article Ghodasgaon. Which one is more correct? If they both are, I can still manually link to mr:घोडसगाव from Ghodasgaon, Jalgaon District Shushugah (talk) 13:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

• I am editing from smartphone , I think your giving advice for me as thinking I'm editing from computer. Research Voltas (talk) 13:06, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I am aware! You can still edit with desktop version of the website, while on mobile phone. Many wonderful contributions to Wikipedia have been made from mobile edits. Shushugah (talk) 13:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing is a good essay to read. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Happyrunner605

Hi. I'll take this conversation away from WP:ORCP as it's probably too much detail over there.

The problem with Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1060#Report to Happyrunner605 is an editor said somebody was being disruptive on two articles, and you asked for clarification on which editor and for diffs. While this is a fair comment, it took me about 10 seconds on each article's history to spot the disruptive editor - if a request for sanctions at ANI is correct, the disruption should leap out like a sore thumb, and it did. You then said a user had been blocked indefinitely for legal threats and being clearly not here, which didn't specify any editor and was not true, and Sandstein corrected you.

On their own, these comments are not problematic. However, at RfA people tend not to like editors who've spent time, especially at ANI, doing "clerking work". By that I mean things like closing ANI threads such as, for example, "User:Willy on Wheels 4K HD blocked indefinitely for vandalism". Unless a thread is heated or controversial, and a close is necessary to make a decision or sum up consensus (actions best done by experienced admins), closing ANI threads isn't really necessary, and could even be undesirable per deny recognition and revert, block, ignore.

I hope that all makes sense. Again, I want to reiterate none of this is really a major problem, but just something to think about moving forward. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Because others may come across this talk page, just wanted to reply thank you for taking the time and care to explain this to me. I will then continue to focus on content creation, which at end of the day, is the core activity of Wikipedia. I've apologised to Sandstein for the sloppy mistake as well, which you can see here which is also a good sign, I am probably not ready for the mop. Shushugah (talk) 12:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Anarchyte Thank you for the trust and access! Is there a single place, where I can see my activity, for example a page log of all reviews I made? In general, how is activity/performance measured? So far I have reviewed the 2-4 pages I see in need of review each time I used it. Shushugah (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Here. As for performance, as long as you're checking the validity of content before you accept you're doing fine. Anarchyte (talk • work) 17:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Shushugah. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you and an honor to hear from you after seeing your username ping so many times in my notifications whenever a page I created was reviewed! My assumption is that pages I create will still will be reviewed by others right? Shushugah (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Do not hesitate to leave me a message

If this is declined alert me so I can send it straight to AFD. Celestina007 (talk) 01:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

This is actually still in Draft, so I shouldn't have marked it for deletion. Barring 6 months of no editing, or speedy deletion criteria, this can stay. If it were submitted, I'd currently mark it for AfD per vanity, and NOINHERIT. Shushugah (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Libcom.org for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libcom.org is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libcom.org (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I explain to him that the problem has been solved and even so, he continues to send me the same thing, thanks for the suggestion. OaxacaGenius (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Abkhazia–United States relations has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Abkhazia–United States relations. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Companies with works councils has been nominated for deletion

Category:Companies with works councils has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Disability in the State of Palestine

Hi, some time ago you expressed interest in this article. I have just moved it to mainspace, though it is still barely more than a stub. I've listed a bunch of possible sources on the talk page, if you're still interested in contributing.

These "Disability in <Country>" articles are intended to be overview articles that briefly summarize various aspects about disability in each country. The general structure and layout is best developed in articles such as Disability in Australia, Disability in India and Disability in South Africa. Please feel free to contribute. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for IBM worker organization

On 20 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article IBM worker organization, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that IBM worker organizations compared the company's business deals with apartheid South Africa in the 1970s to those with Nazi Germany? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/IBM worker organization. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, IBM worker organization), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Embassies in Washington, D.C.

It seems those articles were titled as such to avoid consecutive commas. Maybe this should have been discussed? --Paul_012 (talk) 05:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

I incorrectly remembered reaching a consensus about it in Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations and would support opening a request for comment. If anything I prefer the "Embassies in XYZ" format more, but the majority of current pages didn't have that.

There are a number of issues to resolve, from notability of embassies to naming conventions. I took the most pragmatic approach and saw that almost all embassy pages including the ones located in US and Russia (which have the most embassy pages by far) used the convention of Embassy of XYZ, City. You can see some other considerations I included here Shushugah (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I kind of agree with "Embassies in XYZ", but I'm not actually that invested to initiate such a large request. I just noticed another thing, though. The navboxes you're creating have the template state set as expanded by default. Wouldn't it be better to just follow the usual default, which is autocollapse? An embassy article will carry at least two navboxes, and having them expanded seems like potential clutter. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Seeking help editing an article

Hi @Shushugah:,

I am a student who is new to Wikipedia. In one of my subjects, I am editing and updating the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement article. I saw that you are a member of Wikiproject: International Relations and was wondering if you would be able to provide me with some feedback and help me improve it.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! :)

S2102sa (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

@S2102sa I made minor edits, it's really great! Well done! Shushugah (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

@Shushugah: Thank you so much! S2102sa (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Abkhazia–United States relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abkhazia–United States relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abkhazia–United States relations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Shoshannah Brombacher

Hello, Shushugah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shoshannah Brombacher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - gender

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Shushugah, I saw you posted a ds/aware notice on your user page. If you instead post it on your user talk page, anyone who tries to post an alert later on will see it when they try to publish their change. Just FYI. Thanks, Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campaign To Organize Digital Employees Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campaign To Organize Digital Employees Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thank you for the Diplomacy Documentation templates. It is always useful to find such templates for inter-connected articles. Keep up the good work AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shoshannah Brombacher (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shoshannah Brombacher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shoshannah Brombacher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Shushugah! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Interview?

Hey, I'm a freelance labor journalist interested in righting about anti-union/anti-left bias, and I saw that you're involved in the organized labor project. Would you be willing to do a phone or zoom interview sometime for an article I'm writing? TylerRDavis (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

With pleasure! Check out this interview Zarasophos and I did to promote the WP:WikiProject Organized Labour/May 2021 Hackathon we co-organized. I see you have Twitter, so I messaged you there :) Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK updates to Plevna, Tampere

Hello Shushugah,

I have made some improvements to the article Plevna, Tampere. You may wish to review the nomination Template:Did you know nominations/Plevna, Tampere again. JIP | Talk 03:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@JIPUpdated my review and also the article itself :) needs longer length, otherwise it's ready! Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I have added more material about the history of the industrial building and about the brewery restaurant. There is also an article about Satakunnankatu now, so the hook is now free of red links. JIP | Talk 01:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on my draft

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your assistance on my draft for Holocaust Survivor Chaim Sztajer. I attempted to write this article about two years ago but it got rejected, possibly because it relied too heavily on one biography. Unfortunately there aren't a lot of other sources I can find for the basic biographical information as he is one of the lesser known Treblinka survivors worldwide, though he very is well known in the Melbourne community for his contributions to the Holocaust museum here. I'm working on the draft again now and I just resubmitted it. If you have any other ideas for how I can improve this article please let me know. Thank you again! Apriljennifer (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen

On 27 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the over 349,000 signatures collected in favour of the Expropriate Deutsche Wohnen & Co. initiative set a new record for the number of signatures collected for a Berlin referendum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Precious

union news

Thank you for quality articles such as Benjamin Feigenbaum, Unionization in the tech sector, Sindicatul IT Timișoara and Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen, for welcoming new users, helping them, and improving articles with some enjoyable edit summaries, - Yonatan, "passionate about free information", you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2645 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for this recognition, it made my morning :) I'm glad someone can appreciate my hidden jokes and commentary between my more serious contributions. We're here to edit but also have fun and make friends along the way. I read through WP:QAI and really appreciate the care you show fellow editors over the past decade. Regards from a close by neighbour, both digitally and physically! Shushugah (he/him • talk) 20:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Austrian People’s party

I was stating the truth that The chancellor of Austria brought right wing to far right factions into the party. If I’m wrong I state my mistake and we move on. Worstlimbs (talk) 03:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

@Worstlimbs While in some cases the edits you made were likely true as other editors indicates, you still need to include sourcing. It's not good enough to believe something is true yourself, especially on something as contentious as politics. What mistakes did you make in your opinion? I've posted feedback on your page, and nearly all 25 edits so far have been reverted, but do you understand why? Shushugah (he/him • talk) 03:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

I am a new editor and I don’t know how to cite sources. Worstlimbs (talk) 15:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned talk pages

Hello, Shushugah,

Per CSD G8, talk pages without accompanying articles, templates, files or categories are deleted via speedy deletion. Should you ever wish to create these two templates, I'd be happy to restore the talk pages or you can ask at WP:REFUND. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Shushugah. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. – bradv^🍁 01:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

From Suede (singer)

Pls forgive me if this is not the correct way to respond to the thread I started regarding the Suede (singer) page. I am new to communicating with Wikipedia and not at all familiar with how to do so properly.

I want to clarify, in writing, that I meant no legal threat to Wikipedia at all by my mention of the lawsuit against Sony for trademark violation in 1993 - I just meant to inform Wikipedia on the facts that the band has consistently violated the terms (continuing to use my trademarked name) and I, as a small business owner do my best to clean up those messes, tedious as it is. Unfortunately, it's an overwhelming task - for 28 years. And the confusion continues.

Also - you stated you are going to "delete the article." Would you kindly clarify that? Do you mean the Suede (singer) page will now be deleted completely? I hope not. Pls advise on how I can resolve this, if so.

Thank you for the clarification - on all points. SuedeSuedewave (talk) 18:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@Suedewave no worries, I appreciate your clarification and retraction. I proposed the Article about you for deletion, because it is lacking in Wikipedia:Significant coverage about yourself other than this one lawsuit, which is already mentioned in Suede (band). My recommendation to you, would be to post a brief comment on the deletion discussion with the three best news articles about yourself and let other editors decide on the merits of coverage based on that.

Wikipedia reflects what is already written out there, and does not function as a primary advertisement block on any topic. I know that's frustrating, but the reasoning is explained in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. ~ Shushugah (he/him • talk) 08:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you goat

Thank you for being kind and understanding to me on the Ikea:Talk page and offering to help TomElliott113 (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Apple worker organizations

Hello! Your submission of Apple worker organizations at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MartinPoulter (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1042759567

You removed it, but could you explain how the ANPDP is related to adminship? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nevermind, it's because Blablubbs is already an account creator. Sorry for not thinking ._. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Railways Africa

Just to say thanks: I appreciate the fact you went to the trouble to find some articles that cite Railways Africa as a source. This was exactly the sort of proof I'd hoped for, to demonstrate that it is worthy of an article even if it's not greatly mentioned in secondary sources. Elemimele (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Occupy Wall Street on OTD

Hi and thanks for adding Occupy Wall Street to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 17. Unfortunately, due to the {{too detailed}} maintenance tag on it, we can't include it (see WP:OTDRULES). —howcheng {chat} 15:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

@Howcheng Would it be okay, if I made some editing fixes to the article and resubmitted? Thank you for pinging me ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Sure, if you can get it done before 00:00 UTC. —howcheng {chat} 07:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Howcheng Thank you! I did some proofreading/grammar edits and determined the state of article today is very different/more concise from what it was in 2018 when the tag was added. I re-inserted the anniversary on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 17, but it was reverted due to being improperly formatted. I don't want to engage in edit warring, so I'll refrain from re-inserting again, but perhaps you could have a look/make changes as needed? Best, ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

New sig

Thanks to you I have a new signature now! Thanks for bringing it up in the first place! ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 01:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

East Germany-U.S. Relations

Hey, Shushugah, I'm currently working on creating an article about the relations between what was East Germany and the United States. I've noticed you're from Germany and unfortunately, I have not been able to find much information outside of the links I have stored on my subpage. I can't seem to find any information on the ambassadors of the GDR to the U.S. or images or articles about their old diplomatic mission in Washington. If there are German-language sources for the ambassadors and the mission as well as any other information, I would appreciate it if you could send them to me on my talk page. And there is no deadline. Take your time. Thanks. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Apple worker organizations

On 16 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Apple worker organizations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ahead of the iPhone 4S's launch, Apple retail store workers in Rome went on strike using the slogan "Strike Different", a play on words on Apple's "Think Different"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Apple worker organizations. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Apple worker organizations), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject banner merge

Hi Shushugah, taking you up on your offer of advice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, I have completed the merge. However, I have a question regarding categories. While there is no Category:Philippine History articles, there is a Category:WikiProject Philippine History, presumable from when it was a separate Wikiproject. I do not think the current code maintains this separate category tree. I am trying to merge these with minimal to zero disruption elsewhere, not undoing the work that was previously put into it, so I don't want to replace the obsolete banner until this is sorted. Would you be able to take a look? (Perhaps the Category needs renaming, but I don't know what else would need to be updated to accommodate that so it's low priority.) Thanks, CMD (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis Hey, I created a mass delete/merge nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 20#Merged WikiProject/Task Tracking Categories have a look! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, maybe others will have views. The simplest solution may be keeping the categories as a parallel tree triggered by the task force parameter of the overall template, if that is possible. CMD (talk) 09:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Agreed, the simplest solution may be to rename Category:WikiProject Philippine History to Category:Philippine history task force. This allows it to be associated with multiple WikiProjects if need be, e.g. WP:WikiProject Philippines but also WP:WikiProject History, even if the task force is primarily associated with WikiProject Philippines. I was looking at Category:Sex work task force for inspiration. Ultimately a category is only useful, if they're actively used/have long term tracking potential. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Message for IP needs translation

Since you put a welcome message here, I'd appreciate a translation of my message about the Help Desk response. Just in case the person didn't see that response, I notified the IP as soon as I saw the question in the archives. Yes, I'm way behind. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Diplomatic missions of templates

Do you plan on using this template in the future or is it just a test page you created from your DiplomacyDocumentation subpage? I only ask since I came across it from one of the categories as I was adding the Bahrain–United States relations template I created to relevant pages. The same question goes for the other missions templates you've created not named Afghanistan. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

It is not a test template. If you would like to transclude it in in the two different embassies linked, that would be wonderful.

Initially I myself was initially skeptical whether such template should exist for every country, even where there was only one English Wikipedia link, but the case of Template:Diplomatic missions in Mozambique convinced me otherwise. It currently only links to Holy See mission in English wiki, but has a wealth of information in other languages, that is not captured visibly elsewhere. As you can see from Category:Diplomatic missions by sending country templates, there are many more countries to go. ~ Shushugah (talk) 10:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Come to think of it, could you send me a list of all these types of templates you've created on my talk page. I'll be willing to add them to articles if you can't. I don't want anyone of your templates from being nominated in a future Tfd when it clearly can be used even if it has just one link. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

@WikiCleanerMan Sure see Category:Diplomatic missions by sending country templates and Category:Diplomatic missions by receiving country templates. All of them are on my Watchlist and none have been nominated so far. Thank you for offering to look through them! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

All are now used on at least on one article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You did not get a response to this question. Did you find the help you needed? I don't know how to answer your question, but I just saw it.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee I would love additional thoughts and ideally updating the guidelines where it's mentioned for example at Wikipedia:Write the article first. Thank you! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

That's an essay, not a guideline. The only thing I would be able to help you with is maybe getting someone to update that.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Section links in navboxes can be contested but usually this can be resolved via the navbox's talk page if there is a compelling reason to link to the standalone section. (It's better to discuss on the talk page than the user's page, for posterity and so others can find it.) czar 22:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Shushugah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Ritchie333 Thank you for the email, I have now responded ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the response, I'd appreciate further help

The article is not meant to be promotional at all since the council is a non-profit cooperation platform. No employees, noone is paid, it's a group of volunteers creating initiatives. Please help me figure it out.

Wikiabudhabi (talk) 09:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)wikiabudhabi

@Wikiabudhabi What are the two three best news/academic sources you have on it? I am familiar/empathetic to difficulty of covering non-profit/volunteer initiatives, as you can see I wrote a lot of articles about social movements/activism. Even so, you can still have WP:COI even unpaid. For example, I refrained recently from directly editing 2021 Gorillas strikes and Tech Workers Coalition, two volunteer groups due to my involvement with them. I posted on the Talk pages for them with sources/feedback. So to reiterate, what are the three best sources you have? Without those, no prose/writing style will help at all. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

I guess the council website and social media channels wont be any help here? Wikiabudhabi (talk) 09:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)wikiabudhabi

@Wikiabudhabi Exactly. If those were the only sources you had, that's fine for an activist project, but not for Wikipedia. Please read the links I took the time to find/include in my reply on the talk page. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Misread 12/4 as April 12

Hey! I saw that you said this on the Teahouse and figured I'd ask, do you use the DMY format more often than MDY? Only asking cause that seems like a logical explanation as to why you misread that date. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

@Blaze The Wolf Yup! MDY (date) is primarily used in US and Philippines. I live in Europe and tend to use DMY, however because of the excessive ambiguity in 144 cases (12 months X 12 days) I try to use something less fragile like longer text format (December 4 and 4 December are both clear despite variation). YMD is also quite common in sorting, whereas YDM does not exist. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Neat, and yes I agree in cases where the date is 1-12 it can get confusing. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk response

No one caught your mistake here but you were not at the Teahouse. I'm just now seeing archives that are a month old so hopefully you're not still making this mistake.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee Welcome to my talk page! Thanks for bringing it to my attention! In a template I created today {{WikiDonation}}, I’ve preemptively edited it to not couple it with WP:TH for this reason. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)