Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Sidbidmidlid, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 22:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dates in Wikipedia articles

Two date formats are commonly used in Wikipedia articles: December 2, 2009 and 2 December 2009. These are referred to as alphanumeric dates. The first is used in articles with a connection to the United States, and the second in articles relating to most Commonwealth countries (although no preference is expressed for Canada). In articles with no particular national affiliation, to prevent needless edit warring, the established date format should not be changed. However any given article should use just one of the two formats consistently. Dates that are all numeric are highly discouraged to avoid confusion, however if used must be in the YYYY-MM-DD format and never in YYYY-DD-MM format.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Nomination of Oak Road Estate for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oak Road Estate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Road Estate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

KH-1 (talk) 00:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit
 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. KH-1 (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

No, I am not a paid editor. I just wanted to create my first article and took randomly this company and wrote about it. I feel very pleasure to contribute to Wikipedia! Surely, I have learnt a lot from the experts here and will do my best in future by following them and the rules. Sidbidmidlid (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Off-wiki evidence shows without a doubt that you are engaged in paid editing. It's in your best interests to be transparent.-KH-1 (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have just seen you are referring someone id on freelancer with me. That is truly a coincidence! If that was me, why should have i used that nick here? Anyhows, i am a new editor and is doing my best to contribute my knowledge and experience to this esteemed platform. You may also see my contributions to this platform. Sidbidmidlid (talk) 10:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

You should not add information like a fanboy. Your edits should be unbiased. Karna is a supporting character of B.R. Chopra's Mahabharat. You cannot put him on top. And IMDb cannot be consider as a reliable source since any random people can edit information. So stop doing disruptive editing Rtyggu (talk) 09:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 17:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply