SilverFox220861
The page User:SilverFox220861 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SpencerT•C 21:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Swiss Hotel School South Africa
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Swiss Hotel School South Africa, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.swisshotelschool.co.za/programmes/bachelor-of-hospitality-management/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CUPIDICAE💕 15:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Good afternoon. Would it be possible to reconsider my blocked from editing status? The errors that I made previously will not happen again SilverFox220861 (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- SilverFox220861 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- SilverFox220861 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "SilverFox220861". The reason given for SilverFox220861's block is: "undisclosed paid editor".
- Blocking administrator: Jimfbleak (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
SilverFox220861 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have read through the reasons for my blocking and understand fully where I made violations. These included copywrite and advertising and that through my niavity with using Wikipedia I used language that promoted a person or organisation whilst uploading information for The Swiss Hotel School South Africa. I understand why this was considered self promoting. Before deletion I attempted to correct this info. I am not a paid contributor and am not hired to create articles. Please reconsider my blocking so that I can become a useful contributor to Wikipedia. I agree to abide by the rules and understand the need to reference correctly. My original submission included some cut and paste which also violated the rules of Wikipedia. I am an educator and believe that I can be a worthwhile citizen of Wikipedia given the chance to contribute within the rules. My apologies for using the platform for unambiguous advertingSilverFox220861 (talk) 03:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Just based on this request and your edits I do not believe for a second that you have no paid relationship with this school. You do not have to be specifically paid to edit to be a paid editor, any paid relationship triggers the disclosure requirement. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I understand your reply and of course I do have a paid relationship with the school. I did not hide that I actually included that in my submission. I would like you to consider that I would like a chance to be a contributor to Wikipedia and although my first attempts broke all the rules I think I could be of value. However I do respect your rejection.
- SilverFox220861 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- SilverFox220861 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "SilverFox220861". The reason given for SilverFox220861's block is: "undisclosed paid editor".
- Blocking administrator: Jimfbleak (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Please would you reconsider the decision to block