SirArsalanPak

January 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SirArsalanPak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my work is real not spamming. i am new next time i will completing follow your policy thanks Please Unblock. Thanks Wikipedia SirArsalanPak (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The links you added were unambiguously spam, and it seems that you might have a conflict of interest as well. You won't be allowed to make such edits again. To be unblocked, you will need to describe what constructive contributions you want to make to this encyclopedia. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SirArsalanPak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

when i edit this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilink. first you can check there are many links connect on target words. like ase https://simpakages.pk/jazz-sms-packages/ link with Jazz sms Packages Refrence No 25 and https://propakistani.pk/2017/01/06/mobilink-warid-merging-one-brand-jazz/ link with [Mobilink and Warid are Merging] now i use same method. if my link is spam then these all links are spam. plz remove because this advertisment links. Now i use same method on helpful site https://www.iamarsalan.com/SirArsalanPak (talk) 19:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are saying other links are bad, therefore you should be able to insert bad links. No thanks. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. You also haven't addressed your violation of WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.