Sixone63
August 2021
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 08:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Sixone63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is the first occurrence of this happening, @Nick-D: had written a verbal warning on my talk page regarding disruptive editing, I asked Nick-D for examples of this occurring and instead of fairly providing evidence so I can reflect on my behavior, I was instead blocked for 2 days, now I can understand this action if I continued to disrupt/harass, but to be blocked for 2 days for simply asking for what I have done wrong is ludicrous and counter-productive. It is also pre-emptive, how can you pre-emptively block people for stuff they haven't done yet? Makes no sense. This user has also not provided any reasoning for this block, when I asked for reasoning I got blocked initially, when I've asked to conversate to work out the apparent issue, I've been ignored. So in conclusion: * I make a mistake by adding slogans to another users page * Nick-D writes a verbal warning on my talk page not to continue disruptive/harassing edits * I ask Nick-D what edits he's referring to * I get blocked for 48 hrs and any attempts to resolve/communicate regarding this issue are ignored awesome Sixone63 (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@HighInBC: for all the silliness i dont have anything against any wiki users, but can you tell me why someone is reverting my edits under 'hate-speech', surely we can both recognize my 'wikipedia slogans' as just lighthearted comedy mocking this situation and the website in general, i do not intend to attack anyone. If you genuinely consider them heinous personal attacks or "hate-speech", please remove, I do not wish to cause more trouble. I just struggle to see how any of those slogans are hate speech.
As you are continuing to post serious abuse of other editors here, I have set the block duration to indefinite. Your talk page access will also be removed if this talk page continues to be misused. Nick-D (talk) 11:06, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Sixone63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
wtf? how am i abusing any other editors??? i was making lighthearted comedic slogans, @HighInBC: had no issue besides one edit which I removed. BilCat has similar content on his page??? Where is the personal attacks??? How is writing about being censored reasoning for me to be banned indefinitely for "more personal attacks"??? I wasn't attacking anyone?? @HighInBC: had seen my edits and took no action besides a warn for a silly word I used, I agreed with them, and asked again if my edits were fine (see above), now all of a sudden @Nick-D: swoops in and bans me for life? For what? Writing comedic slogans on my own talk page?? No editors were being attacked, no comments were made regarding individuals, I was making satiric comments about wikipedia censorship - which you have proved just now by banning me for making these very comments? what the hell @HighInBC: can you please help, i will take a 4 day ban if necessary, i dont wish to lose wiki perms because of one admins vendetta against me?? This is the content in question: *Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia ran by CENSORED and CENSORED *Wikipedia: [REDACTED] *Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia anyone can edit then get blocked and censored. *Wikipedia: Where you get blocked for asking what you did wrong *Wikipedia: We dont read what you write so don't bother *Wikipedia: blablahblah can't hear you *Wikipedia: Where if if you're over the age of 40 you have free reign to insult people without consequence *Wikipedia: The only place you can read about censorship while being censored *Wikipedia: Dont question anyone or get blocked *Wikipedia: The only place more restrictive than supermax jail! *Wikipedia: Worlds leading supplier of ball gags *Wikipedia: Where we want B-grade websites to repost information so we can consider it usable ! BilCat has very similar content on his page (my inspiration), so how come one admin can decide this content is ok, then another can ban me out of the blue for the same stuff? This same sentiment is repeated on BilCats comedic slogans, do they get an indef ban for hate speech too?
Decline reason:
You seem to be working hard to demonstrate you should remain blocked. So be it. WP:UTRS is available if you change your mind. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Saying I had no issue other than the one thing is downright dishonest, especially after removing what I wrote on this very page. I am sure the reviewing admin knows how to use the history button. Also I specifically told you those edits were unacceptable and the sort of thing that would get you a longer block[1]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:25, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
(edit conflict) As this editor has re-posted their abuse directed at other editors as part of the above despite being repeatedly warned about this (including that it is not a joke to abuse other people), I have removed their talk page access. In the event that a reviewing admin has concerns about this, I would be pleased to discuss. Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)