Smitty1028
This is Smitty1028's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Margaret Borland has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 14:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Would you be able to tell me when this page will be public on wikipedia? My friend couldn't look it up on their phone but I am able to find it by logging in. Thanks again! Smitty1028 (talk) 02:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Margaret Borland
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Margaret Borland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.womenhistoryblog.com/2015/07/margaret-borland.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elizium23 (talk) 02:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
New ref for Margaret Borland
editPlease take a look at the new reference I added to Margaret Borland. The book Texas Women on the Cattle Trails has a large section on Borland, with lots of information that you can use to expand the article. In addition, the chapter on Borland has extensive references itself, which may help you find additional sources to support notability. Schazjmd (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
fyi
editIn Margaret Borland § Death the source should contain a red link: Evergreen Cemetery, Victoria (instead of: Evergreen Cemetery, Victoria). No one wants this. Therefore it should be done by the article's creator himself. Cf. Wikipedia:Red link § top: "Red links help Wikipedia grow." Thank you. Tobias Epos (talk) 02:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)