Sobek2000

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Acolex2 (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I truly do not understand what your problem is. Your only argument for Cleopatra IV being Pharaoh was that 'she was deified'. I debunked this argument instantly and Chris Bennet's site you yourself quoted agrees with me - being included into dynastic cult did not make person rulling Pharaoh. Cleopatra IV was not Pharaoh and I explained to you why. I thought that's how it works - one side presnets argument, second person presnets their own argument. You presented none and produced one book that - incorrectly - presents Cleopatra IV as rulling queen, whereas Chris Bennet's site, Tara Sewell-Lasater, book about Ptolemaic deification you yourself had linked and Sally Ann Ashton's book do not list her as queen regnant. Why is this so hard for you to understand you are in wrong?

When you brougt other queens who were also not included in protocols, I did agree with you and I explained that we can discuss their status - however there is nothing to discuss in case of Cleopatra IV. Your failed provide any argument except 'deification' which - as I said 100 times - does not make person a Pharaoh. Sobek2000 (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)