Alex of Canada

Recent edit to Westwood Plateau

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Westwood Plateau, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 04:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Population sources

I noticed that you updated some population numbers on articles from the 2016 census without providing a source. Providing a source for information like this is a Wikipedia policy WP:VERIFIABILITY and most importantly it gives credibility to Wikipedia when people can easily verify information that they find here. Please go back to your edits and include your source. Thanks a lot. Air.light (talk) 21:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC) Sorry. I was in a rush. Socialistboyy (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)socialistboyy

March 2017

Hello, I'm TheCoffeeAddict. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of cities in Canada have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 12:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Not constructive? Seriously? Thats the actual population as of the 2016 census. Socialistboyy (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)socialistboyy

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:MPLA are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

shake map

Did you try it ? --Itu (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

No, sorry. Couldn't really figure it out. Alex of Canada (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Alex of Canada

Updating climate charts

Thanks for updating the climate charts like you have been. When you do update climate charts, please make sure all of the data on the chart comes from the same station. For example, on the Salt Spring Island chart I noticed you updated some figures but didn't change the extreme temperatures which were from a different station on the island. Also if you add a new record high into the chart please be sure to add a reference for it from the daily data for that station. Thanks a lot! Air.light (talk) 00:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. Will do. It should be noted I won't be on for a while, as I'm going on vacation tomorrow. Alex of Canada (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Alex of Canada

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Sure would be helpful/nice if you'd use edits summaries each time you changed an article. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 18:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Alright, sorry. Will do. Alex of Canada (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Lil peep

Nope, it ain't a prank unfortanely. Peep died of an overdose of xanax x fetanyl. So goddamn sad, the guy is gone too soon and I miss him already--Macadam1 (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Shit. I'll probably not be on for a while then. Alex of Canada (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Lil Peep are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2017 Jecheon Fire— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rockstar (Post Malone song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you have any questions, can ask for assistance from the Help Desek. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 06:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Clarification

Hi, the lists that we have that use M6 as inclusion limit were not set by WikiProject Earthquakes (or anyone for that matter). That just came about somehow during the early days of WP. You know how most things developed (or continue to be developed)? People just duplicate what someone else has done. In other words, no consensus was ever established about this issue. I am not even sure which editor was the first one to start that practice :) but I have been active with WP Earthquakes for several years and have put some effort into stopping it. We should not be listing earthquakes that meet some arbitrary minimum magnitude. There's no real reason to. Effects are what should limit whether an event should be listed or not. Dawnseeker2000 01:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

I understand. My problem is, deadly earthquakes are rare in Canada, so the list is quite empty only including those. Magnitude 6 earthquakes are quite relevant here when they happen, and are put everywhere on the news. Alex of Canada (talk) 03:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

I've opened a discussion on the article's talk page, which is where this should be thrashed out. Mikenorton (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Your recent editing history at Richard B. Spencer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Richard B. Spencer is under WP:1RR, since it is under Discretionary sanctions.

Discuss on the article's talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Grayfell (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Edit war? It was two edits. That's hardly a "war" of any sort Alex of Canada (talk) 07:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Again, since the article is under discretionary sanctions, even a single revert is a problem. I strongly recommend you self-revert and resolve this on the talk page first. Grayfell (talk) 07:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

I agree. Thanks for the quick reply, I made a discussion on the talk page. Alex of Canada (talk) 07:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Did you miss the part about WP:1RR and self-reverting? By self-revert, I mean that you undo the contested edit until this is resolved. Grayfell (talk) 07:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for post-1932 politics of the United States

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Grayfell (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop Alex of Canada (talk) 08:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

For Brilliant Coverage of News

	Dedication Hurricane
	This is for you, from a fellow Canadian novice editor, for being on alert and creating pages about very recent news faster than the wind. Serioulsy, cheers! User:Double Plus Ungood (talk) 28 February 2018 PS-You can put this on your U-page if you want to.

Wow! Thank you! I'll continue to edit. Alex of Canada (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2018 Vienna stabbing

The article 2018 Vienna stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, this looks like something you might see on the local news channel. To avoid this possibly going to AfD this should be left up (this template stays for 7 days) for possible article improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2018 Vienna stabbing

The article 2018 Vienna stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, this looks like something you might see on the local news channel.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Siddiqsazzad001 (TALK) 11:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 Vienna stabbing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Vienna stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Vienna stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

You have messages!

Hi, Alex of Canada. You have a new message on your talk page at the Simple English Wikipedia. Click here to view it. Thanks! Dane|Geld 00:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Winter Cherry complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winter Cherry complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Cherry complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ GB fan 16:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

A complaint and two notes of thanks

First, since it's said too rarely, I see you editing a lot so thanks for all your hard work.

As I'm sure you know by the fact you self-reverted this is not on; don't talk to other editors like that, no matter how frustrated you may get.

With that said, thanks also for realising the need to remove it again. Too many people dig their heels in when they make a mistake.

Happy editing! -- BobTheIP editing as 88.111.218.152 (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Elon, Virginia

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Alex of Canada, thanks for creating Elon, Virginia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You didn't get a response to your question about editing graphs, but WP:VPT might be the place to ask.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

On account of this edit: [1].Volunteer Marek (talk) 00:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 Eastern Canada heat wave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Eastern Canada heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Eastern Canada heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 07:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Beat me to it.

I was going to correct Atlantic to Pacific, then got an edit conflict. You beat me to it. Thank you. 108.160.124.180 (talk) 00:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Albany limousine crash moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Albany limousine crash, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I’m out of town for now. Going home later today though. Alex of Canada (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Wrong Tab Sagay Massacre

Thank you mate, I was going to message one of the editor of that page but I forgot I was still in the wrong tab Cheers

Oh, alright. That's cool. Alex of Canada (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Revert to edits on list of earthquakes

Can you please give the rationale for your revert? I'd be fine with it if you gave me a reason for it, but right now it just seems like a random unexplained undo. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 21:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Don't message me. I was writing a reason, but I accidentally sent too early. Alex of Canada (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

What's the reason? I am messaging to help clarify the situation to arrive at the best consensus for editing on wikipedia, as editors trying to avoid edit conflicts should do. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 00:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alex of Canada. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alex of Canada. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for your work on 2018 Anchorage earthquake Seraphim System (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Request for Arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Inclusion of "otherwise notable" earthquakes on List of earthquakes in xxxx year and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Bradv🍁 20:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

This case request has been closed as withdrawn. Bradv🍁 20:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019

On 5 March 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Citation problem

Re this edit, I assume you used some automated means to create the citation template. Unfortunately, that resulted in a trashy citation, as can be seen here. For starters, it put things in the author name fields that have nothing to do with any author (that particular news story has no byline, therefore no author is needed in the citation). Use of an automated means does not mean you're not responsible for the results. I have cleaned up that instance "manually" using the basic wiki editor, but please take this into consideration in future edits. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, it seems to work fine for me. I'm not exactly sure what the problem is. Sorry if it caused any for you, though. Alex of Canada (talk) 23:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

I thought I just explained what the problem is, or at least the worst part of it. For example, "Mar 18" and "March 19" are not authors' surnames, and "CBC News · Posted:" and "2019 9:56 PM ET | Last Updated:" are not authors' forenames. Looking at the template code in the diff I linked might aid your understanding. I also gave you a link to the rendered citation. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. Perhaps Wikipedia should fix their automatic citations.... Alex of Canada (talk) 23:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

I agree. In the meantime, however, you're responsible for the results of a tool that you choose to use. ―Mandruss ☎ 23:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Al Noor Mosque, Christchurch

I would concur with your edit to this page -- as it stands now. But the History section may get changed very soon. If you self-revert, I can keep this information:

In 2014 the New Zealand and Australian press reported an allegation that in 2011 an Australian man was introduced to radical Islam at the mosque

from appearing in the same (sub)section as this information:

On 15 March 2019, the site, along with Linwood Islamic Centre, was a target of the Christchurch mosque shootings.

which one editor may well challenge as WP:SYNTH that "directly negatively affects the life safety of people related to the mosque" and "may incite another shooting". Many thanks! --Dervorguilla (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure what you're asking of me. Alex of Canada (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Apologies; I'm just asking you to self-revert, for now. (You're welcome come back and restore the change after the material gets added, if you see fit!) --Dervorguilla (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't really see the purpose, but I guess I will then. Alex of Canada (talk) 05:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

You may thereby have saved the lives of millions of registered voters!!

As to whether that editor's objections had any merit whatsoever, I'd rather not say... --Dervorguilla (talk) 06:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Carlotta

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Tropical Storm Carlotta (2018) is now getting attention in terms of editing. There appears to be an impact from the storm. There is an ongoing merge discussion here if you would like to participate. Noah^Talk 10:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (List of cities in Canada by elevation) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of cities in Canada by elevation.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add your references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Plantation explosion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plantation explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plantation explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Plantdrew (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating 2019 El Paso shooting.

User:Willbb234 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Page looks good, lots of regular updates on the source though, so keep your eyes open. If you need me to keep the page updated, drop me a message and I'll see what I can do.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234 (talk) 18:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)