Some1asks
Welcome!
|
Do not get confused!
editThe Council of Europe ITSELF says, "Do not get confused" http://www.coe.int/en/web/about-us/do-not-get-confused
University Study, Stage 1 Completed (in full)
editUniversity Study, Stage 1 Completed (in full). Special Study Stage 1 has been completed in full, with all questions not only being answered but results per criterion have been achieved with great speed. As adoption was made, moving so rapidly to stage 2 has provoked various levels of external surprise. Uncle shocked but parent is reticent. Parent confirms 87% Male sub b. As per sub c. 25% under 18, 25% 18-22, 25% 23-30 and 25% over 30.
Stage 2 has already been initiated as per study protocols.
May 2016
edit- Checkuser note: The account does not appear to be compromised remotely. Mike V • Talk 03:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
See Permission below
editAuthorised Permitted Access
editThe title says it all.. Some1asks (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. You can't share accounts on Wikipedia, as has been pointed out. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Who us 'sharing' an account? Is a Bot sharing an account? Is a person doing the exact bidding of the account holder, because the account holder is not able themselves to make the entry 'sharing'? Lets take International Law and associated National Laws into account (in regard to the disabled 1 in 5 of the Global Population), is someone acting solely on another's behalf, entering material entirely on a persons behalf 'sharing'.. International Law (Treaty Obligations), and connected National Laws says NO. Some1asks (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) It should be pointed out, perhaps, that "International Law (Treaty Obligations), and connected National Laws" will not help you much if you have your talk-page access revoked. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Having had the account 'blocked' erroneously, it has not stopped access! Multiple computer devices, multiple locations, multiple internet network providers, new identities, are not going to stop anyone! ESPECIALLY when
- Authorised Permitted Access is the issue, and if and when actions by Wikipedia breaches International Law it makes it vulnerable to a class action prosecution!
Well, here you are-
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
QUOTE FROM 'May 2016'
- : Checkuser note: The account does not appear to be compromised remotely. Mike V • Talk 03:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
pp Some1asks (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I've revoked your Talk page access. You may use WP:UTRS to appeal.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppeteer
editNote that this user engaged in sockpuppeteering to get around their block using the account, Mum Bot (talk · contribs) which has now been blocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Some1asks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)