Songdamen
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Songdamen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I abused the account I did not know is restrictive to over use the account, I will not continue with disruptive login on my account and shall be blocked again if I don't stick to the conducts, but it won't be that way cause I understand what am actually blocked for.
Decline reason:
You lied before in order to get unblocked, and then used sockpuppet accounts to do things which you had promised not to do. I see no reason to think that this time your promise is worth more than it was before. Go somewhere else to promote yourself: Wikipedia is not the place to do it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:31, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
editHello I'm afraid it's not enough to claim understanding-- one must articulate which edits were inappropriate and why. Also, this seems to be a checkuser block. Which suggests sockpuppetry. Could you please discuss this? What other accounts have you edited under? To what end? How was that wrong? Further, what will be different, what sort of constructive edits will you make once unblocked?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
editI contributed to other users which seemed as a checkuser block, and this affected my account, resulting as a member of sockpuppetry. I've been editing on different articles my contributions can prove that for me. I wasn't promoting myself and let me know if is wrong to be honest. I'm not saying this just to be unblocked, am stating this to indicate am affected by this sockpuppetry. @ "JamesBWatson" (talk)
I edited and fixed inappropriate information on several articles. I will edit articles that needs to be fixed, that needs sources, and achievement by certain individual or groups of people succeeding on a certain project. @Dlohcierekim (talk)
Songdamen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wanna continue as an information provider, I won't break any promises I made. And I won't edit nothing that has to do with me. I agree I misused my account, and I am willing to do anything am requested to do in order to collaborate nicely with the administrators and along with the other users. I wanna correct articles with relevant information. I would like to help other users to improve articles about notable sources. Please allow me to prove that I won't course any inappropriate edit by sticking to the principles and if I don't I will be blocked again.
Decline reason:
No. This is no different from the last time you made promises. You've shown you can't be trusted. We asked, "Do you understand and fully accept that if you are unblocked you will absolutely not be allowed to write about yourself or your music? That being so, and given that you have so far written articles only about yourself, your music, or its publisher, what do you want to write about?" You said, "Absolutely yes, I will not write about myself or my products. I want to write about human achievement, knowledge, and historic life. If I break the rules I may be blocked immediately but that is not necessary because I will stick to the principles" and then you broke your promise. As you agreed, the result was that you were blocked and we see we can not trust your word. I see you blanked this promise on your master account. I'm revoking talk page access here to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yamla (talk) 11:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.