SonofCoul1

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

SonofCoul1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

SonofCoul1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "AidepikiwIV". The reason given for AidepikiwIV's block is: "Copyright infringement: Edit warring, failure to understand copyright, insulting another editor".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Cullen328‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Seems to be clear meat puppetry. I'll block this account directly. 331dot (talk) 07:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonofCoul1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not commtitting sockpuppet. My IP address was used by someone else. This is completely unfair. I can't even remember the last time I was on Wikipedia for editing. Please unblock me. I shouldn't be punsished for the actions of someone else. SonofCoul1 (talk) 08:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Ah ha. You realise your contribution history is public, right? See Special:Contributions/SonofCoul1. Good block, clearly WP:MEAT if not outright WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 09:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonofCoul1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How does my contribution page prove anything? Obviously it shows that I edited in 2024 this month cause, you know, we are literally having a conversation in my talk page. I haven't done anything involving copyright infringement or any of the other things that editor was blocked for. I have every right to be unblocked. SonofCoul1 (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your request would be more convincing if you hadn't created HimTheirOwn immediately after making this request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SonofCoul1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So creating another account in which I haven't done anything but normal edits and nothing malicious somehow proves your point how exactly? SonofCoul1 (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per discussion below. — Daniel Case (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You shouldn't be creating new accounts at all while any account you use is blocked. The block is on you personally, not just your account. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Well I didn't know that. If I did, I wouldn't have done it. But if I was really doing Sock puppetry, wouldn't I have just used that new account to do more vandalisms like you all think I did? Instead all I did was contribute to multiple articles. Please unblock me. I don't mean to do anything wrong I just want to edit.SonofCoul1 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Only one open request is needed at a time. Additional comments should be standard, unformatted comments like this. 331dot (talk) 20:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't know that either. Can you respond to what I previously wrote please? SonofCoul1 (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if your edits were good, you shouldn't have made them at all. Someone else will review this, and they may take action as they see fit without asking me. 331dot (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I already said I didn't know that. I didn't make them with malicious intent. I just want to go back to editing with no troubles. SonofCoul1 (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)