Spfeff22

Peer Review: Social Media in Public Admin

In this peer review I examined Social Media in Public Administration and how it’s applied to the public sector. The article headings and main key points are listed and include basic information on social media, fundraising, events in the community, promoting organizations and campaigning. However, these main key points are not summarized in the lead section of the article. The structure of the headings are very clear and concise and the information given for each section provides evidence and examples. My suggestion to the group would be to add photos to the article to give readers a more visual idea of the concept. Throughout the article I also found grammatical errors and incorrect sentence structures. Also one of the headings are missing a letter. Positively, this article is straightforward and does not contain unsourced opinions but provides pros and cons behind the concept. This helps the reader gain a full understanding of how social media effects public sector negatively and positively. Overall, the group in my opinion deserves a rating of 4. Not only did the group provide efficient evidence that supported social media in Public Administration but also structured the article in a way for readers to grasp the concept easier. Great Job Overall.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hewhoamareismyself was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Amycogdill/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoamareismyself 09:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Spfeff22, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! hewhoamareismyself 09:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Amycogdill/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

You have not completed the student training.

Please complete the student training. If you have already gone through it, be sure to click the button at the end to record that you finished it. --ekh 22:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilykayhanks (talk • contribs)

GREETINGS

Hello Spefeff22, My name is Huzani Sesay and I am in your PA class and learning how to be a better wikipedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HuzaniJ (talk • contribs) 15:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)