SpoiledTink

edit count | edit summary usage

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello SpoiledTink! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini háblame aquí 15:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Citing sources Neutral Point of View Describing points of view Attribution Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Etiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Resolving disputes Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Tools Village pump

September 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kirsten Storms. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, by the sources you have given me, it clearly states that there's no actual word on her "supposed" engagement. Now, I've added a source of Kirsten Storms dating Elias Reidy. But, if AtlCrash continues adding the engagement thing, he/she can be blocked for adding "false" info. without a reliable source. And if the user continues, drop me a notice on my talkpage and I'll report the user. For the future, try to avoid the three-revert rule, because that may lead to a block for yourself. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)